Cargando…

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has the advantages of causing less postoperative pain and requiring a short hospital stay, and therefore is the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis. This study was designed to compare spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine given as a conventional d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imbelloni, Luiz Eduardo, Sant’Anna, Raphael, Fornasari, Marcos, Fialho, José Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915892
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S19979
_version_ 1782240574013702144
author Imbelloni, Luiz Eduardo
Sant’Anna, Raphael
Fornasari, Marcos
Fialho, José Carlos
author_facet Imbelloni, Luiz Eduardo
Sant’Anna, Raphael
Fornasari, Marcos
Fialho, José Carlos
author_sort Imbelloni, Luiz Eduardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has the advantages of causing less postoperative pain and requiring a short hospital stay, and therefore is the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis. This study was designed to compare spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine given as a conventional dose by lumbar puncture or as a low-dose by thoracic puncture. METHODS: A total of 140 patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low-pressure CO(2) pneumoperitoneum under spinal anesthesia using either conventional lumbar spinal anesthesia (hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg and fentanyl 20 mg) or low-dose thoracic spinal anesthesia (hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg and fentanyl 20 μg). Intraoperative parameters, postoperative pain, complications, recovery time, and patient satisfaction at follow-up were compared between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: All procedures were completed under spinal anesthesia, with no cases needing conversion to general anesthesia. Values for time for block to reach the T(3) dermatomal level, duration of motor and sensory block, and hypotensive events were significantly lower with low-dose bupivacaine. Postoperative pain was higher for low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine at 6 and 12 hours. All patients were discharged after 24 hours. Follow-up 1 week postoperatively showed all patients to be satisfied and to be keen advocates of spinal anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed successfully under spinal anesthesia. A small dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg and 20 μg fentanyl provides adequate spinal anesthesia for laparoscopy and, in comparison with hyperbaric bupivacaine 15% and fentanyl 20 μg, causes markedly less hypotension. The low-dose strategy may have an advantage in ambulatory patients because of the earlier recovery of motor and sensory function and earlier discharge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3417972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34179722012-08-22 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine Imbelloni, Luiz Eduardo Sant’Anna, Raphael Fornasari, Marcos Fialho, José Carlos Local Reg Anesth Original Research BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has the advantages of causing less postoperative pain and requiring a short hospital stay, and therefore is the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis. This study was designed to compare spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine given as a conventional dose by lumbar puncture or as a low-dose by thoracic puncture. METHODS: A total of 140 patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low-pressure CO(2) pneumoperitoneum under spinal anesthesia using either conventional lumbar spinal anesthesia (hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg and fentanyl 20 mg) or low-dose thoracic spinal anesthesia (hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg and fentanyl 20 μg). Intraoperative parameters, postoperative pain, complications, recovery time, and patient satisfaction at follow-up were compared between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: All procedures were completed under spinal anesthesia, with no cases needing conversion to general anesthesia. Values for time for block to reach the T(3) dermatomal level, duration of motor and sensory block, and hypotensive events were significantly lower with low-dose bupivacaine. Postoperative pain was higher for low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine at 6 and 12 hours. All patients were discharged after 24 hours. Follow-up 1 week postoperatively showed all patients to be satisfied and to be keen advocates of spinal anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed successfully under spinal anesthesia. A small dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg and 20 μg fentanyl provides adequate spinal anesthesia for laparoscopy and, in comparison with hyperbaric bupivacaine 15% and fentanyl 20 μg, causes markedly less hypotension. The low-dose strategy may have an advantage in ambulatory patients because of the earlier recovery of motor and sensory function and earlier discharge. Dove Medical Press 2011-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3417972/ /pubmed/22915892 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S19979 Text en © 2011 Imbelloni et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Imbelloni, Luiz Eduardo
Sant’Anna, Raphael
Fornasari, Marcos
Fialho, José Carlos
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine
title Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine
title_full Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine
title_fullStr Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine
title_short Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine
title_sort laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: comparative study between conventional-dose and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915892
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S19979
work_keys_str_mv AT imbelloniluizeduardo laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalanesthesiacomparativestudybetweenconventionaldoseandlowdosehyperbaricbupivacaine
AT santannaraphael laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalanesthesiacomparativestudybetweenconventionaldoseandlowdosehyperbaricbupivacaine
AT fornasarimarcos laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalanesthesiacomparativestudybetweenconventionaldoseandlowdosehyperbaricbupivacaine
AT fialhojosecarlos laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalanesthesiacomparativestudybetweenconventionaldoseandlowdosehyperbaricbupivacaine