Cargando…

New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect and acceptance of a new lidocaine lozenge compared with a lidocaine viscous oral solution as a pharyngeal anesthetic before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE), a diagnostic procedure commonly performed worldwide during which many patients experience severe disco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mogensen, Stine, Treldal, Charlotte, Feldager, Erik, Pulis, Sylvia, Jacobsen, Jette, Andersen, Ove, Rasmussen, Mette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915898
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S30715
_version_ 1782240575355879424
author Mogensen, Stine
Treldal, Charlotte
Feldager, Erik
Pulis, Sylvia
Jacobsen, Jette
Andersen, Ove
Rasmussen, Mette
author_facet Mogensen, Stine
Treldal, Charlotte
Feldager, Erik
Pulis, Sylvia
Jacobsen, Jette
Andersen, Ove
Rasmussen, Mette
author_sort Mogensen, Stine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect and acceptance of a new lidocaine lozenge compared with a lidocaine viscous oral solution as a pharyngeal anesthetic before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE), a diagnostic procedure commonly performed worldwide during which many patients experience severe discomfort mostly because of the gag reflex. PARTICIPANTS: The single-blinded, randomized, controlled study involved 110 adult patients undergoing diagnostic UGE at the Department of Gastroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Denmark. METHODS: The patients were randomized to receive either 100 mg lidocaine as a lozenge or 5 mL lidocaine viscous oral solution 2%. Intravenous midazolam was administered if needed. The effect of a lidocaine lozenge in reducing patient discomfort, including the gag reflex, during UGE compared with a lidocaine oral solution was assessed. RESULTS: Questionnaires from the patients showed that the gag reflex was acceptable for 64% in the lozenge group compared with 33% in the oral solution group (P = 0.0072). UGE was evaluated as acceptable by 69% in the lozenge group compared with 39% in the oral solution group (P = 0.0092). The taste was evaluated as good by 78% in the lozenge group (P < 0.0001), and 82% found the lozenge to have good texture (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The lozenge reduced the gag reflex, diminished patients’ discomfort during UGE, and was evaluated as having a good taste and texture. The lozenge improved patients’ acceptance of UGE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3417978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34179782012-08-22 New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Mogensen, Stine Treldal, Charlotte Feldager, Erik Pulis, Sylvia Jacobsen, Jette Andersen, Ove Rasmussen, Mette Local Reg Anesth Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect and acceptance of a new lidocaine lozenge compared with a lidocaine viscous oral solution as a pharyngeal anesthetic before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE), a diagnostic procedure commonly performed worldwide during which many patients experience severe discomfort mostly because of the gag reflex. PARTICIPANTS: The single-blinded, randomized, controlled study involved 110 adult patients undergoing diagnostic UGE at the Department of Gastroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Denmark. METHODS: The patients were randomized to receive either 100 mg lidocaine as a lozenge or 5 mL lidocaine viscous oral solution 2%. Intravenous midazolam was administered if needed. The effect of a lidocaine lozenge in reducing patient discomfort, including the gag reflex, during UGE compared with a lidocaine oral solution was assessed. RESULTS: Questionnaires from the patients showed that the gag reflex was acceptable for 64% in the lozenge group compared with 33% in the oral solution group (P = 0.0072). UGE was evaluated as acceptable by 69% in the lozenge group compared with 39% in the oral solution group (P = 0.0092). The taste was evaluated as good by 78% in the lozenge group (P < 0.0001), and 82% found the lozenge to have good texture (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The lozenge reduced the gag reflex, diminished patients’ discomfort during UGE, and was evaluated as having a good taste and texture. The lozenge improved patients’ acceptance of UGE. Dove Medical Press 2012-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3417978/ /pubmed/22915898 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S30715 Text en © 2012 Mogensen et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mogensen, Stine
Treldal, Charlotte
Feldager, Erik
Pulis, Sylvia
Jacobsen, Jette
Andersen, Ove
Rasmussen, Mette
New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_fullStr New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full_unstemmed New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_short New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_sort new lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915898
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S30715
work_keys_str_mv AT mogensenstine newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT treldalcharlotte newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT feldagererik newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT pulissylvia newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT jacobsenjette newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT andersenove newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT rasmussenmette newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy