Cargando…
New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect and acceptance of a new lidocaine lozenge compared with a lidocaine viscous oral solution as a pharyngeal anesthetic before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE), a diagnostic procedure commonly performed worldwide during which many patients experience severe disco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915898 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S30715 |
_version_ | 1782240575355879424 |
---|---|
author | Mogensen, Stine Treldal, Charlotte Feldager, Erik Pulis, Sylvia Jacobsen, Jette Andersen, Ove Rasmussen, Mette |
author_facet | Mogensen, Stine Treldal, Charlotte Feldager, Erik Pulis, Sylvia Jacobsen, Jette Andersen, Ove Rasmussen, Mette |
author_sort | Mogensen, Stine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect and acceptance of a new lidocaine lozenge compared with a lidocaine viscous oral solution as a pharyngeal anesthetic before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE), a diagnostic procedure commonly performed worldwide during which many patients experience severe discomfort mostly because of the gag reflex. PARTICIPANTS: The single-blinded, randomized, controlled study involved 110 adult patients undergoing diagnostic UGE at the Department of Gastroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Denmark. METHODS: The patients were randomized to receive either 100 mg lidocaine as a lozenge or 5 mL lidocaine viscous oral solution 2%. Intravenous midazolam was administered if needed. The effect of a lidocaine lozenge in reducing patient discomfort, including the gag reflex, during UGE compared with a lidocaine oral solution was assessed. RESULTS: Questionnaires from the patients showed that the gag reflex was acceptable for 64% in the lozenge group compared with 33% in the oral solution group (P = 0.0072). UGE was evaluated as acceptable by 69% in the lozenge group compared with 39% in the oral solution group (P = 0.0092). The taste was evaluated as good by 78% in the lozenge group (P < 0.0001), and 82% found the lozenge to have good texture (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The lozenge reduced the gag reflex, diminished patients’ discomfort during UGE, and was evaluated as having a good taste and texture. The lozenge improved patients’ acceptance of UGE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3417978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34179782012-08-22 New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Mogensen, Stine Treldal, Charlotte Feldager, Erik Pulis, Sylvia Jacobsen, Jette Andersen, Ove Rasmussen, Mette Local Reg Anesth Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect and acceptance of a new lidocaine lozenge compared with a lidocaine viscous oral solution as a pharyngeal anesthetic before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE), a diagnostic procedure commonly performed worldwide during which many patients experience severe discomfort mostly because of the gag reflex. PARTICIPANTS: The single-blinded, randomized, controlled study involved 110 adult patients undergoing diagnostic UGE at the Department of Gastroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Denmark. METHODS: The patients were randomized to receive either 100 mg lidocaine as a lozenge or 5 mL lidocaine viscous oral solution 2%. Intravenous midazolam was administered if needed. The effect of a lidocaine lozenge in reducing patient discomfort, including the gag reflex, during UGE compared with a lidocaine oral solution was assessed. RESULTS: Questionnaires from the patients showed that the gag reflex was acceptable for 64% in the lozenge group compared with 33% in the oral solution group (P = 0.0072). UGE was evaluated as acceptable by 69% in the lozenge group compared with 39% in the oral solution group (P = 0.0092). The taste was evaluated as good by 78% in the lozenge group (P < 0.0001), and 82% found the lozenge to have good texture (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The lozenge reduced the gag reflex, diminished patients’ discomfort during UGE, and was evaluated as having a good taste and texture. The lozenge improved patients’ acceptance of UGE. Dove Medical Press 2012-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3417978/ /pubmed/22915898 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S30715 Text en © 2012 Mogensen et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mogensen, Stine Treldal, Charlotte Feldager, Erik Pulis, Sylvia Jacobsen, Jette Andersen, Ove Rasmussen, Mette New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title | New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_full | New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_fullStr | New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_short | New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_sort | new lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915898 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S30715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mogensenstine newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT treldalcharlotte newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT feldagererik newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT pulissylvia newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT jacobsenjette newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT andersenove newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT rasmussenmette newlidocainelozengeastopicalanesthesiacomparedtolidocaineviscousoralsolutionbeforeuppergastrointestinalendoscopy |