Cargando…
Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition
Previous studies have reported facilitatory effects of semantic richness on word recognition (e.g., Yap et al., 2012). These effects suggest that word meaning is an important contributor to lexical decision task (LDT) performance, but what are the effects of repeated LDT practice on these semantic c...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3418682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912610 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00234 |
_version_ | 1782240660001128448 |
---|---|
author | Hargreaves, Ian S. Pexman, Penny M. |
author_facet | Hargreaves, Ian S. Pexman, Penny M. |
author_sort | Hargreaves, Ian S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous studies have reported facilitatory effects of semantic richness on word recognition (e.g., Yap et al., 2012). These effects suggest that word meaning is an important contributor to lexical decision task (LDT) performance, but what are the effects of repeated LDT practice on these semantic contributions? The current study utilized data from the British Lexicon Project (BLP) in which 78 participants made lexical decision judgments for 28,730 words over 16 h. We used linear mixed effects to detect practice-driven changes in the explanatory variance accounted for by a set of lexical predictors that included numerous indices of relative semantic richness, including imageability, the number of senses and average radius of co-occurrence (ARC). Results showed that practice was associated with decreasing effects of predictors such as word frequency and imageability. In contrast, ARC effects were only slightly diminished with repeated practice, and effects of the number of senses and the age of acquisition were unaffected by practice. We interpret our results within a framework in which variables may dynamically influence lexical processing and the post-lexical decision making mechanisms that also contribute to LDT performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3418682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34186822012-08-21 Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition Hargreaves, Ian S. Pexman, Penny M. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Previous studies have reported facilitatory effects of semantic richness on word recognition (e.g., Yap et al., 2012). These effects suggest that word meaning is an important contributor to lexical decision task (LDT) performance, but what are the effects of repeated LDT practice on these semantic contributions? The current study utilized data from the British Lexicon Project (BLP) in which 78 participants made lexical decision judgments for 28,730 words over 16 h. We used linear mixed effects to detect practice-driven changes in the explanatory variance accounted for by a set of lexical predictors that included numerous indices of relative semantic richness, including imageability, the number of senses and average radius of co-occurrence (ARC). Results showed that practice was associated with decreasing effects of predictors such as word frequency and imageability. In contrast, ARC effects were only slightly diminished with repeated practice, and effects of the number of senses and the age of acquisition were unaffected by practice. We interpret our results within a framework in which variables may dynamically influence lexical processing and the post-lexical decision making mechanisms that also contribute to LDT performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3418682/ /pubmed/22912610 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00234 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hargreaves and Pexman. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Hargreaves, Ian S. Pexman, Penny M. Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition |
title | Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition |
title_full | Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition |
title_fullStr | Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition |
title_full_unstemmed | Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition |
title_short | Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition |
title_sort | does richness lose its luster? effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3418682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912610 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hargreavesians doesrichnessloseitslustereffectsofextensivepracticeonsemanticrichnessinvisualwordrecognition AT pexmanpennym doesrichnessloseitslustereffectsofextensivepracticeonsemanticrichnessinvisualwordrecognition |