Cargando…

Comparative analysis of grapevine whole-genome gene predictions, functional annotation, categorization and integration of the predicted gene sequences

BACKGROUND: The first draft assembly and gene prediction of the grapevine genome (8X base coverage) was made available to the scientific community in 2007, and functional annotation was developed on this gene prediction. Since then additional Sanger sequences were added to the 8X sequences pool and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grimplet, Jérôme, Van Hemert, John, Carbonell-Bejerano, Pablo, Díaz-Riquelme, José, Dickerson, Julie, Fennell, Anne, Pezzotti, Mario, Martínez-Zapater, José M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22554261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-213
_version_ 1782240745349971968
author Grimplet, Jérôme
Van Hemert, John
Carbonell-Bejerano, Pablo
Díaz-Riquelme, José
Dickerson, Julie
Fennell, Anne
Pezzotti, Mario
Martínez-Zapater, José M
author_facet Grimplet, Jérôme
Van Hemert, John
Carbonell-Bejerano, Pablo
Díaz-Riquelme, José
Dickerson, Julie
Fennell, Anne
Pezzotti, Mario
Martínez-Zapater, José M
author_sort Grimplet, Jérôme
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The first draft assembly and gene prediction of the grapevine genome (8X base coverage) was made available to the scientific community in 2007, and functional annotation was developed on this gene prediction. Since then additional Sanger sequences were added to the 8X sequences pool and a new version of the genomic sequence with superior base coverage (12X) was produced. RESULTS: In order to more efficiently annotate the function of the genes predicted in the new assembly, it is important to build on as much of the previous work as possible, by transferring 8X annotation of the genome to the 12X version. The 8X and 12X assemblies and gene predictions of the grapevine genome were compared to answer the question, “Can we uniquely map 8X predicted genes to 12X predicted genes?” The results show that while the assemblies and gene structure predictions are too different to make a complete mapping between them, most genes (18,725) showed a one-to-one relationship between 8X predicted genes and the last version of 12X predicted genes. In addition, reshuffled genomic sequence structures appeared. These highlight regions of the genome where the gene predictions need to be taken with caution. Based on the new grapevine gene functional annotation and in-depth functional categorization, twenty eight new molecular networks have been created for VitisNet while the existing networks were updated. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of this study provide a functional annotation of the 12X genes, an update of VitisNet, the system of the grapevine molecular networks, and a new functional categorization of genes. Data are available at the VitisNet website (http://www.sdstate.edu/ps/research/vitis/pathways.cfm).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3419625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34196252012-08-16 Comparative analysis of grapevine whole-genome gene predictions, functional annotation, categorization and integration of the predicted gene sequences Grimplet, Jérôme Van Hemert, John Carbonell-Bejerano, Pablo Díaz-Riquelme, José Dickerson, Julie Fennell, Anne Pezzotti, Mario Martínez-Zapater, José M BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: The first draft assembly and gene prediction of the grapevine genome (8X base coverage) was made available to the scientific community in 2007, and functional annotation was developed on this gene prediction. Since then additional Sanger sequences were added to the 8X sequences pool and a new version of the genomic sequence with superior base coverage (12X) was produced. RESULTS: In order to more efficiently annotate the function of the genes predicted in the new assembly, it is important to build on as much of the previous work as possible, by transferring 8X annotation of the genome to the 12X version. The 8X and 12X assemblies and gene predictions of the grapevine genome were compared to answer the question, “Can we uniquely map 8X predicted genes to 12X predicted genes?” The results show that while the assemblies and gene structure predictions are too different to make a complete mapping between them, most genes (18,725) showed a one-to-one relationship between 8X predicted genes and the last version of 12X predicted genes. In addition, reshuffled genomic sequence structures appeared. These highlight regions of the genome where the gene predictions need to be taken with caution. Based on the new grapevine gene functional annotation and in-depth functional categorization, twenty eight new molecular networks have been created for VitisNet while the existing networks were updated. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of this study provide a functional annotation of the 12X genes, an update of VitisNet, the system of the grapevine molecular networks, and a new functional categorization of genes. Data are available at the VitisNet website (http://www.sdstate.edu/ps/research/vitis/pathways.cfm). BioMed Central 2012-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3419625/ /pubmed/22554261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-213 Text en Copyright ©2012 Grimplet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grimplet, Jérôme
Van Hemert, John
Carbonell-Bejerano, Pablo
Díaz-Riquelme, José
Dickerson, Julie
Fennell, Anne
Pezzotti, Mario
Martínez-Zapater, José M
Comparative analysis of grapevine whole-genome gene predictions, functional annotation, categorization and integration of the predicted gene sequences
title Comparative analysis of grapevine whole-genome gene predictions, functional annotation, categorization and integration of the predicted gene sequences
title_full Comparative analysis of grapevine whole-genome gene predictions, functional annotation, categorization and integration of the predicted gene sequences
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of grapevine whole-genome gene predictions, functional annotation, categorization and integration of the predicted gene sequences
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of grapevine whole-genome gene predictions, functional annotation, categorization and integration of the predicted gene sequences
title_short Comparative analysis of grapevine whole-genome gene predictions, functional annotation, categorization and integration of the predicted gene sequences
title_sort comparative analysis of grapevine whole-genome gene predictions, functional annotation, categorization and integration of the predicted gene sequences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22554261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-213
work_keys_str_mv AT grimpletjerome comparativeanalysisofgrapevinewholegenomegenepredictionsfunctionalannotationcategorizationandintegrationofthepredictedgenesequences
AT vanhemertjohn comparativeanalysisofgrapevinewholegenomegenepredictionsfunctionalannotationcategorizationandintegrationofthepredictedgenesequences
AT carbonellbejeranopablo comparativeanalysisofgrapevinewholegenomegenepredictionsfunctionalannotationcategorizationandintegrationofthepredictedgenesequences
AT diazriquelmejose comparativeanalysisofgrapevinewholegenomegenepredictionsfunctionalannotationcategorizationandintegrationofthepredictedgenesequences
AT dickersonjulie comparativeanalysisofgrapevinewholegenomegenepredictionsfunctionalannotationcategorizationandintegrationofthepredictedgenesequences
AT fennellanne comparativeanalysisofgrapevinewholegenomegenepredictionsfunctionalannotationcategorizationandintegrationofthepredictedgenesequences
AT pezzottimario comparativeanalysisofgrapevinewholegenomegenepredictionsfunctionalannotationcategorizationandintegrationofthepredictedgenesequences
AT martinezzapaterjosem comparativeanalysisofgrapevinewholegenomegenepredictionsfunctionalannotationcategorizationandintegrationofthepredictedgenesequences