Cargando…

A Multiple-Choice Task with Changes of Mind

The role of changes of mind and multiple choices has recently received increased attention in the study of perceptual decision-making. Previously, these extensions to standard two-alternative tasks have been studied separately. Here we explored how changes of mind depend on the number of choice-alte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albantakis, Larissa, Branzi, Francesca M., Costa, Albert, Deco, Gustavo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3420910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22916216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043131
_version_ 1782240942008303616
author Albantakis, Larissa
Branzi, Francesca M.
Costa, Albert
Deco, Gustavo
author_facet Albantakis, Larissa
Branzi, Francesca M.
Costa, Albert
Deco, Gustavo
author_sort Albantakis, Larissa
collection PubMed
description The role of changes of mind and multiple choices has recently received increased attention in the study of perceptual decision-making. Previously, these extensions to standard two-alternative tasks have been studied separately. Here we explored how changes of mind depend on the number of choice-alternatives. To this end, we tested 14 human subjects on a 2- and 4-alternative direction-discrimination task. Changes of mind in the participants' movement trajectories could be observed for two and for four choice alternatives. With fewer alternatives, participants responded faster and more accurately. The frequency of changes of mind, however, did not significantly differ for the different numbers of choice alternatives. Nevertheless, mind-changing improved the participants' final performance, particularly for intermediate difficulty levels, in both experimental conditions. Moreover, the mean reaction times of individual participants were negatively correlated with their overall tendency to make changes of mind. We further reproduced these findings with a multi-alternative attractor model for decision-making, while a simple race model could not account for the experimental data. Our experiment, combined with the theoretical models allowed us to shed light on: (1) the differences in choice behavior between two and four alternatives, (2) the differences between the data of our human subjects and previous monkey data, (3) individual differences between participants, and (4) the inhibitory interaction between neural representations of choice alternatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3420910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34209102012-08-22 A Multiple-Choice Task with Changes of Mind Albantakis, Larissa Branzi, Francesca M. Costa, Albert Deco, Gustavo PLoS One Research Article The role of changes of mind and multiple choices has recently received increased attention in the study of perceptual decision-making. Previously, these extensions to standard two-alternative tasks have been studied separately. Here we explored how changes of mind depend on the number of choice-alternatives. To this end, we tested 14 human subjects on a 2- and 4-alternative direction-discrimination task. Changes of mind in the participants' movement trajectories could be observed for two and for four choice alternatives. With fewer alternatives, participants responded faster and more accurately. The frequency of changes of mind, however, did not significantly differ for the different numbers of choice alternatives. Nevertheless, mind-changing improved the participants' final performance, particularly for intermediate difficulty levels, in both experimental conditions. Moreover, the mean reaction times of individual participants were negatively correlated with their overall tendency to make changes of mind. We further reproduced these findings with a multi-alternative attractor model for decision-making, while a simple race model could not account for the experimental data. Our experiment, combined with the theoretical models allowed us to shed light on: (1) the differences in choice behavior between two and four alternatives, (2) the differences between the data of our human subjects and previous monkey data, (3) individual differences between participants, and (4) the inhibitory interaction between neural representations of choice alternatives. Public Library of Science 2012-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3420910/ /pubmed/22916216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043131 Text en © 2012 Albantakis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Albantakis, Larissa
Branzi, Francesca M.
Costa, Albert
Deco, Gustavo
A Multiple-Choice Task with Changes of Mind
title A Multiple-Choice Task with Changes of Mind
title_full A Multiple-Choice Task with Changes of Mind
title_fullStr A Multiple-Choice Task with Changes of Mind
title_full_unstemmed A Multiple-Choice Task with Changes of Mind
title_short A Multiple-Choice Task with Changes of Mind
title_sort multiple-choice task with changes of mind
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3420910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22916216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043131
work_keys_str_mv AT albantakislarissa amultiplechoicetaskwithchangesofmind
AT branzifrancescam amultiplechoicetaskwithchangesofmind
AT costaalbert amultiplechoicetaskwithchangesofmind
AT decogustavo amultiplechoicetaskwithchangesofmind
AT albantakislarissa multiplechoicetaskwithchangesofmind
AT branzifrancescam multiplechoicetaskwithchangesofmind
AT costaalbert multiplechoicetaskwithchangesofmind
AT decogustavo multiplechoicetaskwithchangesofmind