Cargando…

Evaluating the Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as a Candidate Dinoflagellate Barcode Marker

BACKGROUND: DNA barcoding offers an efficient way to determine species identification and to measure biodiversity. For dinoflagellates, an ancient alveolate group of about 2000 described extant species, DNA barcoding studies have revealed large amounts of unrecognized species diversity, most of whic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stern, Rowena F., Andersen, Robert A., Jameson, Ian, Küpper, Frithjof C., Coffroth, Mary-Alice, Vaulot, Daniel, Le Gall, Florence, Véron, Benoît, Brand, Jerry J., Skelton, Hayley, Kasai, Fumai, Lilly, Emily L., Keeling, Patrick J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3420951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22916158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042780
_version_ 1782240951265132544
author Stern, Rowena F.
Andersen, Robert A.
Jameson, Ian
Küpper, Frithjof C.
Coffroth, Mary-Alice
Vaulot, Daniel
Le Gall, Florence
Véron, Benoît
Brand, Jerry J.
Skelton, Hayley
Kasai, Fumai
Lilly, Emily L.
Keeling, Patrick J.
author_facet Stern, Rowena F.
Andersen, Robert A.
Jameson, Ian
Küpper, Frithjof C.
Coffroth, Mary-Alice
Vaulot, Daniel
Le Gall, Florence
Véron, Benoît
Brand, Jerry J.
Skelton, Hayley
Kasai, Fumai
Lilly, Emily L.
Keeling, Patrick J.
author_sort Stern, Rowena F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: DNA barcoding offers an efficient way to determine species identification and to measure biodiversity. For dinoflagellates, an ancient alveolate group of about 2000 described extant species, DNA barcoding studies have revealed large amounts of unrecognized species diversity, most of which is not represented in culture collections. To date, two mitochondrial gene markers, Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) and Cytochrome b oxidase (COB), have been used to assess DNA barcoding in dinoflagellates, and both failed to amplify all taxa and suffered from low resolution. Nevertheless, both genes yielded many examples of morphospecies showing cryptic speciation and morphologically distinct named species being genetically similar, highlighting the need for a common marker. For example, a large number of cultured Symbiodinium strains have neither taxonomic identification, nor a common measure of diversity that can be used to compare this genus to other dinoflagellates. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Internal Transcribed Spacer units 1 and 2 (ITS) of the rDNA operon, as a high resolution marker for distinguishing species dinoflagellates in culture. In our study, from 78 different species, the ITS barcode clearly differentiated species from genera and could identify 96% of strains to a known species or sub-genus grouping. 8.3% showed evidence of being cryptic species. A quarter of strains identified had no previous species identification. The greatest levels of hidden biodiversity came from Scrippsiella and the Pfiesteriaceae family, whilst Heterocapsa strains showed a high level of mismatch to their given species name. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The ITS marker was successful in confirming species, revealing hidden diversity in culture collections. This marker, however, may have limited use for environmental barcoding due to paralogues, the potential for unidentifiable chimaeras and priming across taxa. In these cases ITS would serve well in combination with other markers or for specific taxon studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3420951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34209512012-08-22 Evaluating the Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as a Candidate Dinoflagellate Barcode Marker Stern, Rowena F. Andersen, Robert A. Jameson, Ian Küpper, Frithjof C. Coffroth, Mary-Alice Vaulot, Daniel Le Gall, Florence Véron, Benoît Brand, Jerry J. Skelton, Hayley Kasai, Fumai Lilly, Emily L. Keeling, Patrick J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: DNA barcoding offers an efficient way to determine species identification and to measure biodiversity. For dinoflagellates, an ancient alveolate group of about 2000 described extant species, DNA barcoding studies have revealed large amounts of unrecognized species diversity, most of which is not represented in culture collections. To date, two mitochondrial gene markers, Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) and Cytochrome b oxidase (COB), have been used to assess DNA barcoding in dinoflagellates, and both failed to amplify all taxa and suffered from low resolution. Nevertheless, both genes yielded many examples of morphospecies showing cryptic speciation and morphologically distinct named species being genetically similar, highlighting the need for a common marker. For example, a large number of cultured Symbiodinium strains have neither taxonomic identification, nor a common measure of diversity that can be used to compare this genus to other dinoflagellates. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Internal Transcribed Spacer units 1 and 2 (ITS) of the rDNA operon, as a high resolution marker for distinguishing species dinoflagellates in culture. In our study, from 78 different species, the ITS barcode clearly differentiated species from genera and could identify 96% of strains to a known species or sub-genus grouping. 8.3% showed evidence of being cryptic species. A quarter of strains identified had no previous species identification. The greatest levels of hidden biodiversity came from Scrippsiella and the Pfiesteriaceae family, whilst Heterocapsa strains showed a high level of mismatch to their given species name. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The ITS marker was successful in confirming species, revealing hidden diversity in culture collections. This marker, however, may have limited use for environmental barcoding due to paralogues, the potential for unidentifiable chimaeras and priming across taxa. In these cases ITS would serve well in combination with other markers or for specific taxon studies. Public Library of Science 2012-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3420951/ /pubmed/22916158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042780 Text en © 2012 Stern et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stern, Rowena F.
Andersen, Robert A.
Jameson, Ian
Küpper, Frithjof C.
Coffroth, Mary-Alice
Vaulot, Daniel
Le Gall, Florence
Véron, Benoît
Brand, Jerry J.
Skelton, Hayley
Kasai, Fumai
Lilly, Emily L.
Keeling, Patrick J.
Evaluating the Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as a Candidate Dinoflagellate Barcode Marker
title Evaluating the Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as a Candidate Dinoflagellate Barcode Marker
title_full Evaluating the Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as a Candidate Dinoflagellate Barcode Marker
title_fullStr Evaluating the Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as a Candidate Dinoflagellate Barcode Marker
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as a Candidate Dinoflagellate Barcode Marker
title_short Evaluating the Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as a Candidate Dinoflagellate Barcode Marker
title_sort evaluating the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (its) as a candidate dinoflagellate barcode marker
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3420951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22916158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042780
work_keys_str_mv AT sternrowenaf evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT andersenroberta evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT jamesonian evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT kupperfrithjofc evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT coffrothmaryalice evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT vaulotdaniel evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT legallflorence evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT veronbenoit evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT brandjerryj evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT skeltonhayley evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT kasaifumai evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT lillyemilyl evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker
AT keelingpatrickj evaluatingtheribosomalinternaltranscribedspaceritsasacandidatedinoflagellatebarcodemarker