Cargando…

Monitoring of fracture healing by electrical conduction: A new diagnostic procedure

BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation of fractures has been reported to enhance fracture healing. X-rays are normally used to assess union of fractures. Electrical conduction is not tried as a tool to study fracture healing. The current study focuses on electrical conduction as a diagnostic tool to ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumaravel, Shanmugasundaram, Sundaram, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3421925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912510
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.97260
_version_ 1782240971810930688
author Kumaravel, Shanmugasundaram
Sundaram, S
author_facet Kumaravel, Shanmugasundaram
Sundaram, S
author_sort Kumaravel, Shanmugasundaram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation of fractures has been reported to enhance fracture healing. X-rays are normally used to assess union of fractures. Electrical conduction is not tried as a tool to study fracture healing. The current study focuses on electrical conduction as a diagnostic tool to assess fracture healing and new bone formation. The aim was to find if electrical resistance across the fracture can be used as a tool to study fracture healing which can be verified with simultaneous radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted where 12 open fractures of tibia, including two with bone defects were evaluated. They were debrided and four-carbon ring Ilizarov external fixators were applied. Their healing was followed with clinical assessment and periodical X-rays till the endpoint of fracture union and then the rings were removed. In addition, all these cases also had application of electrical voltage in the range of 0.1–1.0 V DC in 0.1 V increments, across the two wires on either side of fracture. The output current was recorded by an ammeter connected in series. Resistance calculated for various voltages was plotted as a graph for the period of fracture treatment and the characteristics were studied. This graph was compared with the appearance of new bone in the X-rays. RESULTS: In all cases, when the above graph stabilized, in the consecutive recordings, the X-rays showed healing (bridging callus) matching the curve and the patient was able to load the limb. The time of stabilization of this graph for a specific voltage was different in individual cases. However, for a given case, the resistance characteristics were the same for the entire voltage range of 0.1–1.0 V. CONCLUSION: If the resistance versus day curve stabilizes on the consecutive recordings, we can predict that the fracture is in the process of healing. This stabilization period also matched the patients’ ability to comfortably load the limb and also the radiographs which showed bridging callus (healing). If this is used as a positive criterion for fracture healing in future, the radiation exposure by X-rays shall be less.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3421925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34219252012-08-21 Monitoring of fracture healing by electrical conduction: A new diagnostic procedure Kumaravel, Shanmugasundaram Sundaram, S Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation of fractures has been reported to enhance fracture healing. X-rays are normally used to assess union of fractures. Electrical conduction is not tried as a tool to study fracture healing. The current study focuses on electrical conduction as a diagnostic tool to assess fracture healing and new bone formation. The aim was to find if electrical resistance across the fracture can be used as a tool to study fracture healing which can be verified with simultaneous radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted where 12 open fractures of tibia, including two with bone defects were evaluated. They were debrided and four-carbon ring Ilizarov external fixators were applied. Their healing was followed with clinical assessment and periodical X-rays till the endpoint of fracture union and then the rings were removed. In addition, all these cases also had application of electrical voltage in the range of 0.1–1.0 V DC in 0.1 V increments, across the two wires on either side of fracture. The output current was recorded by an ammeter connected in series. Resistance calculated for various voltages was plotted as a graph for the period of fracture treatment and the characteristics were studied. This graph was compared with the appearance of new bone in the X-rays. RESULTS: In all cases, when the above graph stabilized, in the consecutive recordings, the X-rays showed healing (bridging callus) matching the curve and the patient was able to load the limb. The time of stabilization of this graph for a specific voltage was different in individual cases. However, for a given case, the resistance characteristics were the same for the entire voltage range of 0.1–1.0 V. CONCLUSION: If the resistance versus day curve stabilizes on the consecutive recordings, we can predict that the fracture is in the process of healing. This stabilization period also matched the patients’ ability to comfortably load the limb and also the radiographs which showed bridging callus (healing). If this is used as a positive criterion for fracture healing in future, the radiation exposure by X-rays shall be less. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3421925/ /pubmed/22912510 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.97260 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumaravel, Shanmugasundaram
Sundaram, S
Monitoring of fracture healing by electrical conduction: A new diagnostic procedure
title Monitoring of fracture healing by electrical conduction: A new diagnostic procedure
title_full Monitoring of fracture healing by electrical conduction: A new diagnostic procedure
title_fullStr Monitoring of fracture healing by electrical conduction: A new diagnostic procedure
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring of fracture healing by electrical conduction: A new diagnostic procedure
title_short Monitoring of fracture healing by electrical conduction: A new diagnostic procedure
title_sort monitoring of fracture healing by electrical conduction: a new diagnostic procedure
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3421925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912510
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.97260
work_keys_str_mv AT kumaravelshanmugasundaram monitoringoffracturehealingbyelectricalconductionanewdiagnosticprocedure
AT sundarams monitoringoffracturehealingbyelectricalconductionanewdiagnosticprocedure