Cargando…

Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study

BACKGROUND: Use of a pedicle screw at the level of fracture, also known as an intermediate screw, has been shown to improve clinical results in managing lumbar fracture, but there is a paucity of biomechanical studies to support the claim. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hongwei, Li, Changqing, Liu, Tao, Zhao, Wei-dong, Zhou, Yue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3421928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912513
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.98827
_version_ 1782240972479922176
author Wang, Hongwei
Li, Changqing
Liu, Tao
Zhao, Wei-dong
Zhou, Yue
author_facet Wang, Hongwei
Li, Changqing
Liu, Tao
Zhao, Wei-dong
Zhou, Yue
author_sort Wang, Hongwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Use of a pedicle screw at the level of fracture, also known as an intermediate screw, has been shown to improve clinical results in managing lumbar fracture, but there is a paucity of biomechanical studies to support the claim. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding intermediate pedicle screws at the level of a fracture on the stiffness of a short-segment pedicle fixation using monoaxial or polyaxial screws and to compare the strength of monoaxial and polyaxial screws in the calf spine fracture model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flexibility of 12 fresh-frozen calf lumbar spine specimens was evaluated in all planes. An unstable burst fracture model was created at the level of L3 by the pre-injury and dropped-mass technique. The specimens were randomly divided into monoaxial pedicle screw (MPS) and polyaxial pedicle screw (PPS) groups. Flexibility was retested without and with intermediate screws (MPSi and PPSi) placed at the level of fracture in addition to standard screws placed at L2 and L4. RESULTS: The addition of intermediate screws significantly increased the stability of the constructs, as measured by a decreased range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, and lateral bending in both MPS and PPS groups (P < 0.05). There was neither any significant difference in the ROM in the spines of the two groups before injury, nor a difference in the ROM between the MPSi and PPSi groups (P > 0.05), but there was a significant difference between MPS and PPS in flexion and extension in the short-segment fixation group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of intermediate screws at the level of a burst fracture significantly increased the stability of short-segment pedicle screw fixation in both the MPS and PPS groups. However, in short-segment fixation group, monoaxial pedicle screw exhibited more stability in flexion and extension than the polyaxial pedicle screw.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3421928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34219282012-08-21 Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study Wang, Hongwei Li, Changqing Liu, Tao Zhao, Wei-dong Zhou, Yue Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Use of a pedicle screw at the level of fracture, also known as an intermediate screw, has been shown to improve clinical results in managing lumbar fracture, but there is a paucity of biomechanical studies to support the claim. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding intermediate pedicle screws at the level of a fracture on the stiffness of a short-segment pedicle fixation using monoaxial or polyaxial screws and to compare the strength of monoaxial and polyaxial screws in the calf spine fracture model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flexibility of 12 fresh-frozen calf lumbar spine specimens was evaluated in all planes. An unstable burst fracture model was created at the level of L3 by the pre-injury and dropped-mass technique. The specimens were randomly divided into monoaxial pedicle screw (MPS) and polyaxial pedicle screw (PPS) groups. Flexibility was retested without and with intermediate screws (MPSi and PPSi) placed at the level of fracture in addition to standard screws placed at L2 and L4. RESULTS: The addition of intermediate screws significantly increased the stability of the constructs, as measured by a decreased range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, and lateral bending in both MPS and PPS groups (P < 0.05). There was neither any significant difference in the ROM in the spines of the two groups before injury, nor a difference in the ROM between the MPSi and PPSi groups (P > 0.05), but there was a significant difference between MPS and PPS in flexion and extension in the short-segment fixation group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of intermediate screws at the level of a burst fracture significantly increased the stability of short-segment pedicle screw fixation in both the MPS and PPS groups. However, in short-segment fixation group, monoaxial pedicle screw exhibited more stability in flexion and extension than the polyaxial pedicle screw. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3421928/ /pubmed/22912513 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.98827 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Hongwei
Li, Changqing
Liu, Tao
Zhao, Wei-dong
Zhou, Yue
Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study
title Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study
title_full Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study
title_fullStr Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study
title_short Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study
title_sort biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: an experimental study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3421928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912513
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.98827
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghongwei biomechanicalefficacyofmonoaxialorpolyaxialpediclescrewandadditionalscrewinsertionattheleveloffractureinlumbarburstfractureanexperimentalstudy
AT lichangqing biomechanicalefficacyofmonoaxialorpolyaxialpediclescrewandadditionalscrewinsertionattheleveloffractureinlumbarburstfractureanexperimentalstudy
AT liutao biomechanicalefficacyofmonoaxialorpolyaxialpediclescrewandadditionalscrewinsertionattheleveloffractureinlumbarburstfractureanexperimentalstudy
AT zhaoweidong biomechanicalefficacyofmonoaxialorpolyaxialpediclescrewandadditionalscrewinsertionattheleveloffractureinlumbarburstfractureanexperimentalstudy
AT zhouyue biomechanicalefficacyofmonoaxialorpolyaxialpediclescrewandadditionalscrewinsertionattheleveloffractureinlumbarburstfractureanexperimentalstudy