Cargando…

How Accurately Can Emergency Department Providers Estimate Patient Satisfaction?

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction is an important measure of emergency department (ED) quality of care. Little is known about providers' ability to estimate patient satisfaction. We aimed to measure providers' ability to assess patient satisfaction and hypothesized that providers could ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yarris, Lalena M., Frakes, Brooke, Magaret, Nathan, Adams, Annette L., Brooks, Heather, Norton, Robert L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3421976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22942936
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.10.6644
_version_ 1782240979477069824
author Yarris, Lalena M.
Frakes, Brooke
Magaret, Nathan
Adams, Annette L.
Brooks, Heather
Norton, Robert L.
author_facet Yarris, Lalena M.
Frakes, Brooke
Magaret, Nathan
Adams, Annette L.
Brooks, Heather
Norton, Robert L.
author_sort Yarris, Lalena M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction is an important measure of emergency department (ED) quality of care. Little is known about providers' ability to estimate patient satisfaction. We aimed to measure providers' ability to assess patient satisfaction and hypothesized that providers could accurately estimate overall patient satisfaction. METHODS: We surveyed ED patients regarding satisfaction with their care. Treating providers completed analogous surveys, estimating patients' responses. Sexual assault victims and non-English-speaking or severely ill patients were excluded. Satisfaction responses were categorized as “satisfied” or “not satisfied.” Patient satisfaction scores were considered the “gold standard,” and providers' perceptions of the patient satisfaction were considered tests. Measures of diagnostic accuracy, such as positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity, were used to assess how accurately the provider could estimate his or her patient's satisfaction. RESULTS: Here, 242/457 eligible patients (53%) completed the survey; 227 providers (94%) completed a corresponding survey. Subject-reported overall satisfaction was 96.6%, compared with a provider-estimated rate of 94.4%. The sensitivity and PPV of the provider's estimate of the patient's satisfaction were 95.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.4, 97.7) and 97.5 (95% CI 94.4, 99.2), respectively, for overall patient satisfaction. The PPV was similar for clarity of communication. The PPV was 78.9 for perceived length of ED stay (99% CI 70.8, 85.6) and 82.6 for quality of pain control (95% CI 68.6, 92.3). Accuracy of attending and resident estimates of patient satisfaction did not differ significantly. The agreement between patient-reported and provider-estimated patient satisfaction was not associated with age, gender, patient disposition, or ED divert status. CONCLUSION: Providers are able to assess overall patient satisfaction and clarity of communication with a high accuracy. Physician estimates of pain control and perceived length of stay have a moderate accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3421976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34219762012-09-01 How Accurately Can Emergency Department Providers Estimate Patient Satisfaction? Yarris, Lalena M. Frakes, Brooke Magaret, Nathan Adams, Annette L. Brooks, Heather Norton, Robert L. West J Emerg Med Ed Administration INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction is an important measure of emergency department (ED) quality of care. Little is known about providers' ability to estimate patient satisfaction. We aimed to measure providers' ability to assess patient satisfaction and hypothesized that providers could accurately estimate overall patient satisfaction. METHODS: We surveyed ED patients regarding satisfaction with their care. Treating providers completed analogous surveys, estimating patients' responses. Sexual assault victims and non-English-speaking or severely ill patients were excluded. Satisfaction responses were categorized as “satisfied” or “not satisfied.” Patient satisfaction scores were considered the “gold standard,” and providers' perceptions of the patient satisfaction were considered tests. Measures of diagnostic accuracy, such as positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity, were used to assess how accurately the provider could estimate his or her patient's satisfaction. RESULTS: Here, 242/457 eligible patients (53%) completed the survey; 227 providers (94%) completed a corresponding survey. Subject-reported overall satisfaction was 96.6%, compared with a provider-estimated rate of 94.4%. The sensitivity and PPV of the provider's estimate of the patient's satisfaction were 95.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.4, 97.7) and 97.5 (95% CI 94.4, 99.2), respectively, for overall patient satisfaction. The PPV was similar for clarity of communication. The PPV was 78.9 for perceived length of ED stay (99% CI 70.8, 85.6) and 82.6 for quality of pain control (95% CI 68.6, 92.3). Accuracy of attending and resident estimates of patient satisfaction did not differ significantly. The agreement between patient-reported and provider-estimated patient satisfaction was not associated with age, gender, patient disposition, or ED divert status. CONCLUSION: Providers are able to assess overall patient satisfaction and clarity of communication with a high accuracy. Physician estimates of pain control and perceived length of stay have a moderate accuracy. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2012-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3421976/ /pubmed/22942936 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.10.6644 Text en the authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ed Administration
Yarris, Lalena M.
Frakes, Brooke
Magaret, Nathan
Adams, Annette L.
Brooks, Heather
Norton, Robert L.
How Accurately Can Emergency Department Providers Estimate Patient Satisfaction?
title How Accurately Can Emergency Department Providers Estimate Patient Satisfaction?
title_full How Accurately Can Emergency Department Providers Estimate Patient Satisfaction?
title_fullStr How Accurately Can Emergency Department Providers Estimate Patient Satisfaction?
title_full_unstemmed How Accurately Can Emergency Department Providers Estimate Patient Satisfaction?
title_short How Accurately Can Emergency Department Providers Estimate Patient Satisfaction?
title_sort how accurately can emergency department providers estimate patient satisfaction?
topic Ed Administration
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3421976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22942936
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.10.6644
work_keys_str_mv AT yarrislalenam howaccuratelycanemergencydepartmentprovidersestimatepatientsatisfaction
AT frakesbrooke howaccuratelycanemergencydepartmentprovidersestimatepatientsatisfaction
AT magaretnathan howaccuratelycanemergencydepartmentprovidersestimatepatientsatisfaction
AT adamsannettel howaccuratelycanemergencydepartmentprovidersestimatepatientsatisfaction
AT brooksheather howaccuratelycanemergencydepartmentprovidersestimatepatientsatisfaction
AT nortonrobertl howaccuratelycanemergencydepartmentprovidersestimatepatientsatisfaction