Cargando…

An online survey of Australian physicians reported practice with the off-label use of nebulised frusemide

BACKGROUND: Off-label prescribing is common in palliative care. Despite inconsistent reports of the benefit of nebulised frusemide for breathlessness, its use continues to be reported. METHODS: An online survey was emailed to 249 members of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Palliative Medici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Newton, Phillip J, Davidson, Patricia M, Sanderson, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3422185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22546176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-11-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Off-label prescribing is common in palliative care. Despite inconsistent reports of the benefit of nebulised frusemide for breathlessness, its use continues to be reported. METHODS: An online survey was emailed to 249 members of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Palliative Medicine to estimate the use of nebulised frusemide for breathlessness by Australian physicians involved in palliative care in the previous 12 months. RESULTS: There were 52/249 (21%) respondents to the survey. The majority (44/52; 85%) had not prescribed nebulised frusemide in the previous 12 months. The most common (18/44; 43%) reason for not prescribing nebulised frusemide was a belief that there was not enough evidence to support its use. Whilst only a few respondents (8/52; 15%) reported having used nebulised frusemide, all that had used it thought there was at least some benefit in relieving breathlessness. CONCLUSION: This report adds to the series of case studies reporting some benefit from nebulised frusemide in relieving breathlessnes.