Cargando…

Prognostic Impact of del(17p) and del(22q) as Assessed by Interphase FISH in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas

BACKGROUND: Most sporadic colorectal cancer (sCRC) deaths are caused by metastatic dissemination of the primary tumor. New advances in genetic profiling of sCRC suggest that the primary tumor may contain a cell population with metastatic potential. Here we compare the cytogenetic profile of primary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González-González, María, Muñoz-Bellvis, Luís, Mackintosh, Carlos, Fontanillo, Celia, Gutiérrez, M. Laura, Abad, M. Mar, Bengoechea, Oscar, Teodosio, Cristina, Fonseca, Emilio, Fuentes, Manuel, De Las Rivas, Javier, Orfao, Alberto, María Sayagués, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3422354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042683
_version_ 1782241042563596288
author González-González, María
Muñoz-Bellvis, Luís
Mackintosh, Carlos
Fontanillo, Celia
Gutiérrez, M. Laura
Abad, M. Mar
Bengoechea, Oscar
Teodosio, Cristina
Fonseca, Emilio
Fuentes, Manuel
De Las Rivas, Javier
Orfao, Alberto
María Sayagués, José
author_facet González-González, María
Muñoz-Bellvis, Luís
Mackintosh, Carlos
Fontanillo, Celia
Gutiérrez, M. Laura
Abad, M. Mar
Bengoechea, Oscar
Teodosio, Cristina
Fonseca, Emilio
Fuentes, Manuel
De Las Rivas, Javier
Orfao, Alberto
María Sayagués, José
author_sort González-González, María
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most sporadic colorectal cancer (sCRC) deaths are caused by metastatic dissemination of the primary tumor. New advances in genetic profiling of sCRC suggest that the primary tumor may contain a cell population with metastatic potential. Here we compare the cytogenetic profile of primary tumors from liver metastatic versus non-metastatic sCRC. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We prospectively analyzed the frequency of numerical/structural abnormalities of chromosomes 1, 7, 8, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, and 22 by iFISH in 58 sCRC patients: thirty-one non-metastatic (54%) vs. 27 metastatic (46%) disease. From a total of 18 probes, significant differences emerged only for the 17p11.2 and 22q11.2 chromosomal regions. Patients with liver metastatic sCRC showed an increased frequency of del(17p11.2) (10% vs. 67%;p<.001) and del(22q11.2) (0% vs. 22%;p = .02) versusnon-metastatic cases. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) showed that the only clinical and cytogenetic parameters that had an independent adverse impact on patient outcome were the presence of del(17p) with a 17p11.2 breakpoint and del(22q11.2). Based on these two cytogenetic variables, patients were classified into three groups: low- (no adverse features), intermediate- (one adverse feature) and high-risk (two adverse features)- with significantly different OS rates at 5-years (p<.001): 92%, 53% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results unravel the potential implication of del(17p11.2) in sCRC patients with liver metastasis as this cytogenetic alteration appears to be intrinsically related to an increased metastatic potential and a poor outcome, providing additional prognostic information to that associated with other cytogenetic alterations such as del(22q11.2). Additional prospective studies in larger series of patients would be required to confirm the clinical utility of the new prognostic markers identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3422354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34223542012-08-21 Prognostic Impact of del(17p) and del(22q) as Assessed by Interphase FISH in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas González-González, María Muñoz-Bellvis, Luís Mackintosh, Carlos Fontanillo, Celia Gutiérrez, M. Laura Abad, M. Mar Bengoechea, Oscar Teodosio, Cristina Fonseca, Emilio Fuentes, Manuel De Las Rivas, Javier Orfao, Alberto María Sayagués, José PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Most sporadic colorectal cancer (sCRC) deaths are caused by metastatic dissemination of the primary tumor. New advances in genetic profiling of sCRC suggest that the primary tumor may contain a cell population with metastatic potential. Here we compare the cytogenetic profile of primary tumors from liver metastatic versus non-metastatic sCRC. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We prospectively analyzed the frequency of numerical/structural abnormalities of chromosomes 1, 7, 8, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, and 22 by iFISH in 58 sCRC patients: thirty-one non-metastatic (54%) vs. 27 metastatic (46%) disease. From a total of 18 probes, significant differences emerged only for the 17p11.2 and 22q11.2 chromosomal regions. Patients with liver metastatic sCRC showed an increased frequency of del(17p11.2) (10% vs. 67%;p<.001) and del(22q11.2) (0% vs. 22%;p = .02) versusnon-metastatic cases. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) showed that the only clinical and cytogenetic parameters that had an independent adverse impact on patient outcome were the presence of del(17p) with a 17p11.2 breakpoint and del(22q11.2). Based on these two cytogenetic variables, patients were classified into three groups: low- (no adverse features), intermediate- (one adverse feature) and high-risk (two adverse features)- with significantly different OS rates at 5-years (p<.001): 92%, 53% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results unravel the potential implication of del(17p11.2) in sCRC patients with liver metastasis as this cytogenetic alteration appears to be intrinsically related to an increased metastatic potential and a poor outcome, providing additional prognostic information to that associated with other cytogenetic alterations such as del(22q11.2). Additional prospective studies in larger series of patients would be required to confirm the clinical utility of the new prognostic markers identified. Public Library of Science 2012-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3422354/ /pubmed/22912721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042683 Text en © 2012 González-González et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
González-González, María
Muñoz-Bellvis, Luís
Mackintosh, Carlos
Fontanillo, Celia
Gutiérrez, M. Laura
Abad, M. Mar
Bengoechea, Oscar
Teodosio, Cristina
Fonseca, Emilio
Fuentes, Manuel
De Las Rivas, Javier
Orfao, Alberto
María Sayagués, José
Prognostic Impact of del(17p) and del(22q) as Assessed by Interphase FISH in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas
title Prognostic Impact of del(17p) and del(22q) as Assessed by Interphase FISH in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas
title_full Prognostic Impact of del(17p) and del(22q) as Assessed by Interphase FISH in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas
title_fullStr Prognostic Impact of del(17p) and del(22q) as Assessed by Interphase FISH in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Impact of del(17p) and del(22q) as Assessed by Interphase FISH in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas
title_short Prognostic Impact of del(17p) and del(22q) as Assessed by Interphase FISH in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas
title_sort prognostic impact of del(17p) and del(22q) as assessed by interphase fish in sporadic colorectal carcinomas
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3422354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22912721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042683
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezgonzalezmaria prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT munozbellvisluis prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT mackintoshcarlos prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT fontanillocelia prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT gutierrezmlaura prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT abadmmar prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT bengoecheaoscar prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT teodosiocristina prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT fonsecaemilio prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT fuentesmanuel prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT delasrivasjavier prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT orfaoalberto prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas
AT mariasayaguesjose prognosticimpactofdel17panddel22qasassessedbyinterphasefishinsporadiccolorectalcarcinomas