Cargando…

Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated and Proton Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of several external beam radiation treatment modalities for the treatment of patients with localized prostate cancer. Methods: A lifetime Markov model incorporated the probabilities of experiencing treatment-related long-term toxicity or death. Toxicity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parthan, Anju, Pruttivarasin, Narin, Davies, Diane, Taylor, Douglas C. A., Pawar, Vivek, Bijlani, Akash, Lich, Kristen Hassmiller, Chen, Ronald C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3422724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22934286
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2012.00081
_version_ 1782241057831911424
author Parthan, Anju
Pruttivarasin, Narin
Davies, Diane
Taylor, Douglas C. A.
Pawar, Vivek
Bijlani, Akash
Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
Chen, Ronald C.
author_facet Parthan, Anju
Pruttivarasin, Narin
Davies, Diane
Taylor, Douglas C. A.
Pawar, Vivek
Bijlani, Akash
Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
Chen, Ronald C.
author_sort Parthan, Anju
collection PubMed
description Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of several external beam radiation treatment modalities for the treatment of patients with localized prostate cancer. Methods: A lifetime Markov model incorporated the probabilities of experiencing treatment-related long-term toxicity or death. Toxicity probabilities were derived from published sources using meta-analytical techniques. Utilities and costs in the model were obtained from publicly available secondary sources. The model calculated quality-adjusted life expectancy and expected lifetime cost per patient, and derived ratios of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained between treatments. Analyses were conducted from both payer and societal perspectives. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was less costly and resulted in more QALYs. Sensitivity analyses showed that the conclusions in the base-case scenario were robust with respect to variations in toxicity and cost parameters consistent with available evidence. At a threshold of $50,000/QALY, SBRT was cost-effective in 75% and 94% of probabilistic simulations compared to IMRT and PT, respectively, from a payer perspective. From a societal perspective, SBRT was cost-effective in 75% and 96% of simulations compared to IMRT and PT, respectively, at a threshold of $50,000/QALY. In threshold analyses, SBRT was less expensive with better outcomes compared to IMRT at toxicity rates 23% greater than the SBRT base-case rates. Conclusion: Based on the assumption that each treatment modality results in equivalent long-term efficacy, SBRT is a cost-effective strategy resulting in improved quality-adjusted survival compared to IMRT and PT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3422724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34227242012-08-29 Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated and Proton Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer Parthan, Anju Pruttivarasin, Narin Davies, Diane Taylor, Douglas C. A. Pawar, Vivek Bijlani, Akash Lich, Kristen Hassmiller Chen, Ronald C. Front Oncol Oncology Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of several external beam radiation treatment modalities for the treatment of patients with localized prostate cancer. Methods: A lifetime Markov model incorporated the probabilities of experiencing treatment-related long-term toxicity or death. Toxicity probabilities were derived from published sources using meta-analytical techniques. Utilities and costs in the model were obtained from publicly available secondary sources. The model calculated quality-adjusted life expectancy and expected lifetime cost per patient, and derived ratios of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained between treatments. Analyses were conducted from both payer and societal perspectives. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was less costly and resulted in more QALYs. Sensitivity analyses showed that the conclusions in the base-case scenario were robust with respect to variations in toxicity and cost parameters consistent with available evidence. At a threshold of $50,000/QALY, SBRT was cost-effective in 75% and 94% of probabilistic simulations compared to IMRT and PT, respectively, from a payer perspective. From a societal perspective, SBRT was cost-effective in 75% and 96% of simulations compared to IMRT and PT, respectively, at a threshold of $50,000/QALY. In threshold analyses, SBRT was less expensive with better outcomes compared to IMRT at toxicity rates 23% greater than the SBRT base-case rates. Conclusion: Based on the assumption that each treatment modality results in equivalent long-term efficacy, SBRT is a cost-effective strategy resulting in improved quality-adjusted survival compared to IMRT and PT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3422724/ /pubmed/22934286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2012.00081 Text en Copyright © 2012 Parthan, Pruttivarasin, Davies, Taylor, Pawar, Bijlani, Lich and Chen. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Oncology
Parthan, Anju
Pruttivarasin, Narin
Davies, Diane
Taylor, Douglas C. A.
Pawar, Vivek
Bijlani, Akash
Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
Chen, Ronald C.
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated and Proton Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
title Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated and Proton Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
title_full Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated and Proton Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated and Proton Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated and Proton Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
title_short Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated and Proton Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
title_sort comparative cost-effectiveness of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated and proton radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3422724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22934286
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2012.00081
work_keys_str_mv AT parthananju comparativecosteffectivenessofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedandprotonradiationtherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT pruttivarasinnarin comparativecosteffectivenessofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedandprotonradiationtherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT daviesdiane comparativecosteffectivenessofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedandprotonradiationtherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT taylordouglasca comparativecosteffectivenessofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedandprotonradiationtherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT pawarvivek comparativecosteffectivenessofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedandprotonradiationtherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT bijlaniakash comparativecosteffectivenessofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedandprotonradiationtherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT lichkristenhassmiller comparativecosteffectivenessofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedandprotonradiationtherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT chenronaldc comparativecosteffectivenessofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedandprotonradiationtherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer