Cargando…

Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening

OBJECTIVE: To develop a computerized clinical decision support system (CDSS) for cervical cancer screening that can interpret free-text Papanicolaou (Pap) reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CDSS was constituted by two rulebases: the free-text rulebase for interpreting Pap reports and a guideline ru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagholikar, Kavishwar B, MacLaughlin, Kathy L, Henry, Michael R, Greenes, Robert A, Hankey, Ronald A, Liu, Hongfang, Chaudhry, Rajeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3422840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22542812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000820
_version_ 1782241061249220608
author Wagholikar, Kavishwar B
MacLaughlin, Kathy L
Henry, Michael R
Greenes, Robert A
Hankey, Ronald A
Liu, Hongfang
Chaudhry, Rajeev
author_facet Wagholikar, Kavishwar B
MacLaughlin, Kathy L
Henry, Michael R
Greenes, Robert A
Hankey, Ronald A
Liu, Hongfang
Chaudhry, Rajeev
author_sort Wagholikar, Kavishwar B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a computerized clinical decision support system (CDSS) for cervical cancer screening that can interpret free-text Papanicolaou (Pap) reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CDSS was constituted by two rulebases: the free-text rulebase for interpreting Pap reports and a guideline rulebase. The free-text rulebase was developed by analyzing a corpus of 49 293 Pap reports. The guideline rulebase was constructed using national cervical cancer screening guidelines. The CDSS accesses the electronic medical record (EMR) system to generate patient-specific recommendations. For evaluation, the screening recommendations made by the CDSS for 74 patients were reviewed by a physician. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Evaluation revealed that the CDSS outputs the optimal screening recommendations for 73 out of 74 test patients and it identified two cases for gynecology referral that were missed by the physician. The CDSS aided the physician to amend recommendations in six cases. The failure case was because human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was sometimes performed separately from the Pap test and these results were reported by a laboratory system that was not queried by the CDSS. Subsequently, the CDSS was upgraded to look up the HPV results missed earlier and it generated the optimal recommendations for all 74 test cases. LIMITATIONS: Single institution and single expert study. CONCLUSION: An accurate CDSS system could be constructed for cervical cancer screening given the standardized reporting of Pap tests and the availability of explicit guidelines. Overall, the study demonstrates that free text in the EMR can be effectively utilized through natural language processing to develop clinical decision support tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3422840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34228402012-08-20 Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening Wagholikar, Kavishwar B MacLaughlin, Kathy L Henry, Michael R Greenes, Robert A Hankey, Ronald A Liu, Hongfang Chaudhry, Rajeev J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: To develop a computerized clinical decision support system (CDSS) for cervical cancer screening that can interpret free-text Papanicolaou (Pap) reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CDSS was constituted by two rulebases: the free-text rulebase for interpreting Pap reports and a guideline rulebase. The free-text rulebase was developed by analyzing a corpus of 49 293 Pap reports. The guideline rulebase was constructed using national cervical cancer screening guidelines. The CDSS accesses the electronic medical record (EMR) system to generate patient-specific recommendations. For evaluation, the screening recommendations made by the CDSS for 74 patients were reviewed by a physician. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Evaluation revealed that the CDSS outputs the optimal screening recommendations for 73 out of 74 test patients and it identified two cases for gynecology referral that were missed by the physician. The CDSS aided the physician to amend recommendations in six cases. The failure case was because human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was sometimes performed separately from the Pap test and these results were reported by a laboratory system that was not queried by the CDSS. Subsequently, the CDSS was upgraded to look up the HPV results missed earlier and it generated the optimal recommendations for all 74 test cases. LIMITATIONS: Single institution and single expert study. CONCLUSION: An accurate CDSS system could be constructed for cervical cancer screening given the standardized reporting of Pap tests and the availability of explicit guidelines. Overall, the study demonstrates that free text in the EMR can be effectively utilized through natural language processing to develop clinical decision support tools. BMJ Group 2012-04-29 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3422840/ /pubmed/22542812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000820 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research and Applications
Wagholikar, Kavishwar B
MacLaughlin, Kathy L
Henry, Michael R
Greenes, Robert A
Hankey, Ronald A
Liu, Hongfang
Chaudhry, Rajeev
Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening
title Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening
title_full Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening
title_fullStr Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening
title_short Clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening
title_sort clinical decision support with automated text processing for cervical cancer screening
topic Research and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3422840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22542812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000820
work_keys_str_mv AT wagholikarkavishwarb clinicaldecisionsupportwithautomatedtextprocessingforcervicalcancerscreening
AT maclaughlinkathyl clinicaldecisionsupportwithautomatedtextprocessingforcervicalcancerscreening
AT henrymichaelr clinicaldecisionsupportwithautomatedtextprocessingforcervicalcancerscreening
AT greenesroberta clinicaldecisionsupportwithautomatedtextprocessingforcervicalcancerscreening
AT hankeyronalda clinicaldecisionsupportwithautomatedtextprocessingforcervicalcancerscreening
AT liuhongfang clinicaldecisionsupportwithautomatedtextprocessingforcervicalcancerscreening
AT chaudhryrajeev clinicaldecisionsupportwithautomatedtextprocessingforcervicalcancerscreening