Cargando…

MRI in evaluation of perianal fistulae

BACKGROUND: Fistula is considered to be any abnormal passage which connects two epithelial surfaces. Parks’ fistulae classification demonstrates the biggest practical significance and divides fistulae into: intersphincteric, transsphincteric, suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric. Etiology of perian...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sofic, Amela, Beslic, Serif, Sehovic, Nedzad, Caluk, Jasmin, Sofic, Damir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Versita, Warsaw 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3423712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22933919
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10019-010-0046-4
_version_ 1782241134675755008
author Sofic, Amela
Beslic, Serif
Sehovic, Nedzad
Caluk, Jasmin
Sofic, Damir
author_facet Sofic, Amela
Beslic, Serif
Sehovic, Nedzad
Caluk, Jasmin
Sofic, Damir
author_sort Sofic, Amela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fistula is considered to be any abnormal passage which connects two epithelial surfaces. Parks’ fistulae classification demonstrates the biggest practical significance and divides fistulae into: intersphincteric, transsphincteric, suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric. Etiology of perianal fistulae is most commonly linked with the inflammation of anal glands in Crohn’s disease, tuberculosis, pelvic infections, pelvic malignant tumours, and with the radiotherapy. Diagnostic method options are: RTG fistulography, CT fistulography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of pelvic organs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have included 24 patients with perirectal fistulae in the prospective study. X-rays fistulography, CT fistulography, and then MRI of the pelvic cavity have been performed on all patients. Accuracy of each procedure in regards to the patients and the etiologic cause have been statistically determined. RESULTS: 29.16% of transphincteric fistulae have been found, followed by 25% of intersphincteric, 25% of recto-vaginal, 12.5% of extrasphincteric, and 8.33% of suprasphincteric. Abscess collections have been found in 16.6% patients. The most frequent etiologic cause of perianal fistulae was Crohn’s disease in 37.5%, where the accuracy of classification of MRI was 100%, CT was 11% and X-rays 0%. Ulcerous colitis was the second cause, with 20.9% where the accuracy of MRI was 100%, while CT was 80% and X-rays was 0%. All other etiologic causes of fistulae were found in 41.6% patients. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is a reliable diagnostic modality in the classification of perirectal fistulae and can be an excellent diagnostic guide for successful surgical interventions with the aim to reduce the number of recurrences. Its advantage is that fistulae and abscess are visible without the need to apply any contrast medium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3423712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Versita, Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34237122012-08-29 MRI in evaluation of perianal fistulae Sofic, Amela Beslic, Serif Sehovic, Nedzad Caluk, Jasmin Sofic, Damir Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Fistula is considered to be any abnormal passage which connects two epithelial surfaces. Parks’ fistulae classification demonstrates the biggest practical significance and divides fistulae into: intersphincteric, transsphincteric, suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric. Etiology of perianal fistulae is most commonly linked with the inflammation of anal glands in Crohn’s disease, tuberculosis, pelvic infections, pelvic malignant tumours, and with the radiotherapy. Diagnostic method options are: RTG fistulography, CT fistulography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of pelvic organs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have included 24 patients with perirectal fistulae in the prospective study. X-rays fistulography, CT fistulography, and then MRI of the pelvic cavity have been performed on all patients. Accuracy of each procedure in regards to the patients and the etiologic cause have been statistically determined. RESULTS: 29.16% of transphincteric fistulae have been found, followed by 25% of intersphincteric, 25% of recto-vaginal, 12.5% of extrasphincteric, and 8.33% of suprasphincteric. Abscess collections have been found in 16.6% patients. The most frequent etiologic cause of perianal fistulae was Crohn’s disease in 37.5%, where the accuracy of classification of MRI was 100%, CT was 11% and X-rays 0%. Ulcerous colitis was the second cause, with 20.9% where the accuracy of MRI was 100%, while CT was 80% and X-rays was 0%. All other etiologic causes of fistulae were found in 41.6% patients. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is a reliable diagnostic modality in the classification of perirectal fistulae and can be an excellent diagnostic guide for successful surgical interventions with the aim to reduce the number of recurrences. Its advantage is that fistulae and abscess are visible without the need to apply any contrast medium. Versita, Warsaw 2010-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3423712/ /pubmed/22933919 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10019-010-0046-4 Text en Copyright © by Association of Radiology & Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Sofic, Amela
Beslic, Serif
Sehovic, Nedzad
Caluk, Jasmin
Sofic, Damir
MRI in evaluation of perianal fistulae
title MRI in evaluation of perianal fistulae
title_full MRI in evaluation of perianal fistulae
title_fullStr MRI in evaluation of perianal fistulae
title_full_unstemmed MRI in evaluation of perianal fistulae
title_short MRI in evaluation of perianal fistulae
title_sort mri in evaluation of perianal fistulae
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3423712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22933919
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10019-010-0046-4
work_keys_str_mv AT soficamela mriinevaluationofperianalfistulae
AT beslicserif mriinevaluationofperianalfistulae
AT sehovicnedzad mriinevaluationofperianalfistulae
AT calukjasmin mriinevaluationofperianalfistulae
AT soficdamir mriinevaluationofperianalfistulae