Cargando…

Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment

Introduction: differentiating mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from normal cognition (NC) is difficult. The AB Cognitive Screen (ABCS) 135, sensitive in differentiating MCI from dementia, was modified to improve sensitivity and specificity, producing the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Caoimh, Rónán, Gao, Yang, McGlade, Ciara, Healy, Liam, Gallagher, Paul, Timmons, Suzanne, Molloy, D. William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3424052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22610464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs059
_version_ 1782241174167224320
author O'Caoimh, Rónán
Gao, Yang
McGlade, Ciara
Healy, Liam
Gallagher, Paul
Timmons, Suzanne
Molloy, D. William
author_facet O'Caoimh, Rónán
Gao, Yang
McGlade, Ciara
Healy, Liam
Gallagher, Paul
Timmons, Suzanne
Molloy, D. William
author_sort O'Caoimh, Rónán
collection PubMed
description Introduction: differentiating mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from normal cognition (NC) is difficult. The AB Cognitive Screen (ABCS) 135, sensitive in differentiating MCI from dementia, was modified to improve sensitivity and specificity, producing the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen. Objective: this study compared the sensitivity and specificity of the Qmci with the Standardised MMSE and ABCS 135, to differentiate NC, MCI and dementia. Methods: weightings and subtests of the ABCS 135 were changed and a new section ‘logical memory’ added, creating the Qmci. From four memory clinics in Ontario, Canada, 335 subjects (154 with MCI, 181 with dementia) were recruited and underwent comprehensive assessment. Caregivers, attending with the subjects, without cognitive symptoms, were recruited as controls (n = 630). Results: the Qmci was more sensitive than the SMMSE and ABCS 135, in differentiating MCI from NC, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 compared with 0.67 and 0.83, respectively, and in differentiating MCI from mild dementia, AUC of 0.92 versus 0.91 and 0.91. The ability of the Qmci to identify MCI was better for those over 75 years. Conclusion: the Qmci is more sensitive than the SMMSE in differentiating MCI and NC, making it a useful test, for MCI in clinical practice, especially for older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3424052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34240522012-08-21 Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment O'Caoimh, Rónán Gao, Yang McGlade, Ciara Healy, Liam Gallagher, Paul Timmons, Suzanne Molloy, D. William Age Ageing Research Papers Introduction: differentiating mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from normal cognition (NC) is difficult. The AB Cognitive Screen (ABCS) 135, sensitive in differentiating MCI from dementia, was modified to improve sensitivity and specificity, producing the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen. Objective: this study compared the sensitivity and specificity of the Qmci with the Standardised MMSE and ABCS 135, to differentiate NC, MCI and dementia. Methods: weightings and subtests of the ABCS 135 were changed and a new section ‘logical memory’ added, creating the Qmci. From four memory clinics in Ontario, Canada, 335 subjects (154 with MCI, 181 with dementia) were recruited and underwent comprehensive assessment. Caregivers, attending with the subjects, without cognitive symptoms, were recruited as controls (n = 630). Results: the Qmci was more sensitive than the SMMSE and ABCS 135, in differentiating MCI from NC, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 compared with 0.67 and 0.83, respectively, and in differentiating MCI from mild dementia, AUC of 0.92 versus 0.91 and 0.91. The ability of the Qmci to identify MCI was better for those over 75 years. Conclusion: the Qmci is more sensitive than the SMMSE in differentiating MCI and NC, making it a useful test, for MCI in clinical practice, especially for older adults. Oxford University Press 2012-09 2012-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3424052/ /pubmed/22610464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs059 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
O'Caoimh, Rónán
Gao, Yang
McGlade, Ciara
Healy, Liam
Gallagher, Paul
Timmons, Suzanne
Molloy, D. William
Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment
title Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment
title_full Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment
title_fullStr Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment
title_short Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment
title_sort comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (qmci) screen and the smmse in screening for mild cognitive impairment
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3424052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22610464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs059
work_keys_str_mv AT ocaoimhronan comparisonofthequickmildcognitiveimpairmentqmciscreenandthesmmseinscreeningformildcognitiveimpairment
AT gaoyang comparisonofthequickmildcognitiveimpairmentqmciscreenandthesmmseinscreeningformildcognitiveimpairment
AT mcgladeciara comparisonofthequickmildcognitiveimpairmentqmciscreenandthesmmseinscreeningformildcognitiveimpairment
AT healyliam comparisonofthequickmildcognitiveimpairmentqmciscreenandthesmmseinscreeningformildcognitiveimpairment
AT gallagherpaul comparisonofthequickmildcognitiveimpairmentqmciscreenandthesmmseinscreeningformildcognitiveimpairment
AT timmonssuzanne comparisonofthequickmildcognitiveimpairmentqmciscreenandthesmmseinscreeningformildcognitiveimpairment
AT molloydwilliam comparisonofthequickmildcognitiveimpairmentqmciscreenandthesmmseinscreeningformildcognitiveimpairment