Cargando…
Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents
OBJECTIVE: In adults, the shape of the glucose response during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) prospectively and independently predicts type 2 diabetes. However, no reports have described the utility of this indicator in younger populations. The purpose of this study was to compare type 2 diab...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3424993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22751962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2476 |
_version_ | 1782241301995978752 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Joon Young Coletta, Dawn K. Mandarino, Lawrence J. Shaibi, Gabriel Q. |
author_facet | Kim, Joon Young Coletta, Dawn K. Mandarino, Lawrence J. Shaibi, Gabriel Q. |
author_sort | Kim, Joon Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In adults, the shape of the glucose response during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) prospectively and independently predicts type 2 diabetes. However, no reports have described the utility of this indicator in younger populations. The purpose of this study was to compare type 2 diabetes risk factors in Latino adolescents characterized by either a monophasic or biphasic glucose response during an OGTT. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 156 nondiabetic Latino adolescents completed a 2-h OGTT. Monophasic and biphasic groups were compared for the following type 2 diabetes risk factors: fasting and 2-h glucose, HbA(1c), glucose area under the curve (AUC), insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), insulin secretion (insulinogenic index), and β-cell function as measured by the disposition index (insulin sensitivity × insulin secretion). RESULTS: Of the participants, 107 youth were categorized as monophasic and 49 were biphasic. Compared with the monophasic group, participants with a biphasic response exhibited lower HbA(1c) (5.4 ± 0.3 vs. 5.6 ± 0.3%, P < 0.01) and lower glucose AUC (14,205 ± 2,382 vs. 16,230 ± 2,537 mg ⋅ dL(−1) ⋅ h(−1), P < 0.001) with higher insulin sensitivity (5.4 ± 3.2 vs. 4.6 ± 3.4, P ≤ 0.05), higher insulin secretion (2.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.8 ± 1.3, P = 0.05), and better β-cell function (10.3 ± 7.8 vs. 6.0 ± 3.6, P < 0.001). Differences persisted after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the glycemic response to an OGTT may differentiate risk for type 2 diabetes in youth. This response may be an early marker of type 2 diabetes risk among high-risk youth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3424993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34249932013-09-01 Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents Kim, Joon Young Coletta, Dawn K. Mandarino, Lawrence J. Shaibi, Gabriel Q. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: In adults, the shape of the glucose response during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) prospectively and independently predicts type 2 diabetes. However, no reports have described the utility of this indicator in younger populations. The purpose of this study was to compare type 2 diabetes risk factors in Latino adolescents characterized by either a monophasic or biphasic glucose response during an OGTT. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 156 nondiabetic Latino adolescents completed a 2-h OGTT. Monophasic and biphasic groups were compared for the following type 2 diabetes risk factors: fasting and 2-h glucose, HbA(1c), glucose area under the curve (AUC), insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), insulin secretion (insulinogenic index), and β-cell function as measured by the disposition index (insulin sensitivity × insulin secretion). RESULTS: Of the participants, 107 youth were categorized as monophasic and 49 were biphasic. Compared with the monophasic group, participants with a biphasic response exhibited lower HbA(1c) (5.4 ± 0.3 vs. 5.6 ± 0.3%, P < 0.01) and lower glucose AUC (14,205 ± 2,382 vs. 16,230 ± 2,537 mg ⋅ dL(−1) ⋅ h(−1), P < 0.001) with higher insulin sensitivity (5.4 ± 3.2 vs. 4.6 ± 3.4, P ≤ 0.05), higher insulin secretion (2.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.8 ± 1.3, P = 0.05), and better β-cell function (10.3 ± 7.8 vs. 6.0 ± 3.6, P < 0.001). Differences persisted after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the glycemic response to an OGTT may differentiate risk for type 2 diabetes in youth. This response may be an early marker of type 2 diabetes risk among high-risk youth. American Diabetes Association 2012-09 2012-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3424993/ /pubmed/22751962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2476 Text en © 2012 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kim, Joon Young Coletta, Dawn K. Mandarino, Lawrence J. Shaibi, Gabriel Q. Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents |
title | Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents |
title_full | Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents |
title_fullStr | Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents |
title_full_unstemmed | Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents |
title_short | Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents |
title_sort | glucose response curve and type 2 diabetes risk in latino adolescents |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3424993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22751962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2476 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjoonyoung glucoseresponsecurveandtype2diabetesriskinlatinoadolescents AT colettadawnk glucoseresponsecurveandtype2diabetesriskinlatinoadolescents AT mandarinolawrencej glucoseresponsecurveandtype2diabetesriskinlatinoadolescents AT shaibigabrielq glucoseresponsecurveandtype2diabetesriskinlatinoadolescents |