Cargando…

Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents

OBJECTIVE: In adults, the shape of the glucose response during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) prospectively and independently predicts type 2 diabetes. However, no reports have described the utility of this indicator in younger populations. The purpose of this study was to compare type 2 diab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Joon Young, Coletta, Dawn K., Mandarino, Lawrence J., Shaibi, Gabriel Q.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3424993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22751962
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2476
_version_ 1782241301995978752
author Kim, Joon Young
Coletta, Dawn K.
Mandarino, Lawrence J.
Shaibi, Gabriel Q.
author_facet Kim, Joon Young
Coletta, Dawn K.
Mandarino, Lawrence J.
Shaibi, Gabriel Q.
author_sort Kim, Joon Young
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In adults, the shape of the glucose response during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) prospectively and independently predicts type 2 diabetes. However, no reports have described the utility of this indicator in younger populations. The purpose of this study was to compare type 2 diabetes risk factors in Latino adolescents characterized by either a monophasic or biphasic glucose response during an OGTT. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 156 nondiabetic Latino adolescents completed a 2-h OGTT. Monophasic and biphasic groups were compared for the following type 2 diabetes risk factors: fasting and 2-h glucose, HbA(1c), glucose area under the curve (AUC), insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), insulin secretion (insulinogenic index), and β-cell function as measured by the disposition index (insulin sensitivity × insulin secretion). RESULTS: Of the participants, 107 youth were categorized as monophasic and 49 were biphasic. Compared with the monophasic group, participants with a biphasic response exhibited lower HbA(1c) (5.4 ± 0.3 vs. 5.6 ± 0.3%, P < 0.01) and lower glucose AUC (14,205 ± 2,382 vs. 16,230 ± 2,537 mg ⋅ dL(−1) ⋅ h(−1), P < 0.001) with higher insulin sensitivity (5.4 ± 3.2 vs. 4.6 ± 3.4, P ≤ 0.05), higher insulin secretion (2.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.8 ± 1.3, P = 0.05), and better β-cell function (10.3 ± 7.8 vs. 6.0 ± 3.6, P < 0.001). Differences persisted after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the glycemic response to an OGTT may differentiate risk for type 2 diabetes in youth. This response may be an early marker of type 2 diabetes risk among high-risk youth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3424993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34249932013-09-01 Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents Kim, Joon Young Coletta, Dawn K. Mandarino, Lawrence J. Shaibi, Gabriel Q. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: In adults, the shape of the glucose response during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) prospectively and independently predicts type 2 diabetes. However, no reports have described the utility of this indicator in younger populations. The purpose of this study was to compare type 2 diabetes risk factors in Latino adolescents characterized by either a monophasic or biphasic glucose response during an OGTT. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 156 nondiabetic Latino adolescents completed a 2-h OGTT. Monophasic and biphasic groups were compared for the following type 2 diabetes risk factors: fasting and 2-h glucose, HbA(1c), glucose area under the curve (AUC), insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), insulin secretion (insulinogenic index), and β-cell function as measured by the disposition index (insulin sensitivity × insulin secretion). RESULTS: Of the participants, 107 youth were categorized as monophasic and 49 were biphasic. Compared with the monophasic group, participants with a biphasic response exhibited lower HbA(1c) (5.4 ± 0.3 vs. 5.6 ± 0.3%, P < 0.01) and lower glucose AUC (14,205 ± 2,382 vs. 16,230 ± 2,537 mg ⋅ dL(−1) ⋅ h(−1), P < 0.001) with higher insulin sensitivity (5.4 ± 3.2 vs. 4.6 ± 3.4, P ≤ 0.05), higher insulin secretion (2.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.8 ± 1.3, P = 0.05), and better β-cell function (10.3 ± 7.8 vs. 6.0 ± 3.6, P < 0.001). Differences persisted after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the glycemic response to an OGTT may differentiate risk for type 2 diabetes in youth. This response may be an early marker of type 2 diabetes risk among high-risk youth. American Diabetes Association 2012-09 2012-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3424993/ /pubmed/22751962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2476 Text en © 2012 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kim, Joon Young
Coletta, Dawn K.
Mandarino, Lawrence J.
Shaibi, Gabriel Q.
Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents
title Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents
title_full Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents
title_fullStr Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents
title_short Glucose Response Curve and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Latino Adolescents
title_sort glucose response curve and type 2 diabetes risk in latino adolescents
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3424993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22751962
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2476
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjoonyoung glucoseresponsecurveandtype2diabetesriskinlatinoadolescents
AT colettadawnk glucoseresponsecurveandtype2diabetesriskinlatinoadolescents
AT mandarinolawrencej glucoseresponsecurveandtype2diabetesriskinlatinoadolescents
AT shaibigabrielq glucoseresponsecurveandtype2diabetesriskinlatinoadolescents