Cargando…

Individual differences in hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties

BACKGROUND: Hemisphericity or individual difference in the preference to use the left or the right hemispheric mode of information processing has been associated with various emotion-related differences. For example, the right hemisphericity has been linked with inhibition of emotional expression, f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Garima, Dubey, Akanksha, Saxena, Prachi, Pandey, Rakesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3425243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22969178
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.98412
_version_ 1782241346996666368
author Gupta, Garima
Dubey, Akanksha
Saxena, Prachi
Pandey, Rakesh
author_facet Gupta, Garima
Dubey, Akanksha
Saxena, Prachi
Pandey, Rakesh
author_sort Gupta, Garima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hemisphericity or individual difference in the preference to use the left or the right hemispheric mode of information processing has been associated with various emotion-related differences. For example, the right hemisphericity has been linked with inhibition of emotional expression, feeling of tension, greater impulsivity etc. These observations suggest that right hemisphericity may be associated with greater difficulties in regulating emotions. However, direct empirical tests of such theoretical proposition are very thin. AIM: In view of this, the present study aims to investigate how and to what extent individual difference in hemispheric preference relate to emotion regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two right-handed male subjects in the age range 18 to 20 years were assessed on self-report measures of hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties. The correlation between dimensions of hemispheric preference and difficulties in regulating emotions was computed. A series of stepwise multiple regression analyses were also done to explore the relative significance of various dimensions of hemispheric preference in predicting emotion regulation difficulties. RESULTS: The findings revealed that in general a preference for the right hemispheric mode of information processing was associated with greater emotion regulation difficulties. The correlation analysis indicated that while impulse control difficulties and difficulties in engaging goal directed behavior was associated with preference for almost all the right hemispheric mode of information processing, the nonacceptance of emotional responses and limited access to emotion regulation was related to preference for only global/synthetic (a right hemispheric) mode of information processing. Similarly, the lack of emotional clarity facet of emotion regulation difficulties correlated significantly with a preference for the emotional mode of information processing (again a right hemispheric mode). The results of stepwise multiple regression analyses, however, indicated that “nonacceptance of emotional responses’ and ‘limited access to emotion regulation strategies” facets of emotion regulation difficulties were best predicted by a preference for the global/synthetic mode of information processing. While others like difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviour, impulse control difficulties, and lack of emotional clarity were best predicted by a preference for visuo-spatial rather than the verbal mode of information processing. CONCLUSION: Overall, the findings imply that greater preference for right hemispheric mode of information processing as compared to the left is associated with greater difficulties in regulating emotions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3425243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34252432012-09-11 Individual differences in hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties Gupta, Garima Dubey, Akanksha Saxena, Prachi Pandey, Rakesh Ind Psychiatry J Original Article BACKGROUND: Hemisphericity or individual difference in the preference to use the left or the right hemispheric mode of information processing has been associated with various emotion-related differences. For example, the right hemisphericity has been linked with inhibition of emotional expression, feeling of tension, greater impulsivity etc. These observations suggest that right hemisphericity may be associated with greater difficulties in regulating emotions. However, direct empirical tests of such theoretical proposition are very thin. AIM: In view of this, the present study aims to investigate how and to what extent individual difference in hemispheric preference relate to emotion regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two right-handed male subjects in the age range 18 to 20 years were assessed on self-report measures of hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties. The correlation between dimensions of hemispheric preference and difficulties in regulating emotions was computed. A series of stepwise multiple regression analyses were also done to explore the relative significance of various dimensions of hemispheric preference in predicting emotion regulation difficulties. RESULTS: The findings revealed that in general a preference for the right hemispheric mode of information processing was associated with greater emotion regulation difficulties. The correlation analysis indicated that while impulse control difficulties and difficulties in engaging goal directed behavior was associated with preference for almost all the right hemispheric mode of information processing, the nonacceptance of emotional responses and limited access to emotion regulation was related to preference for only global/synthetic (a right hemispheric) mode of information processing. Similarly, the lack of emotional clarity facet of emotion regulation difficulties correlated significantly with a preference for the emotional mode of information processing (again a right hemispheric mode). The results of stepwise multiple regression analyses, however, indicated that “nonacceptance of emotional responses’ and ‘limited access to emotion regulation strategies” facets of emotion regulation difficulties were best predicted by a preference for the global/synthetic mode of information processing. While others like difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviour, impulse control difficulties, and lack of emotional clarity were best predicted by a preference for visuo-spatial rather than the verbal mode of information processing. CONCLUSION: Overall, the findings imply that greater preference for right hemispheric mode of information processing as compared to the left is associated with greater difficulties in regulating emotions. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3425243/ /pubmed/22969178 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.98412 Text en Copyright: © Industrial Psychiatry Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Garima
Dubey, Akanksha
Saxena, Prachi
Pandey, Rakesh
Individual differences in hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties
title Individual differences in hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties
title_full Individual differences in hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties
title_fullStr Individual differences in hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties
title_short Individual differences in hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties
title_sort individual differences in hemispheric preference and emotion regulation difficulties
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3425243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22969178
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.98412
work_keys_str_mv AT guptagarima individualdifferencesinhemisphericpreferenceandemotionregulationdifficulties
AT dubeyakanksha individualdifferencesinhemisphericpreferenceandemotionregulationdifficulties
AT saxenaprachi individualdifferencesinhemisphericpreferenceandemotionregulationdifficulties
AT pandeyrakesh individualdifferencesinhemisphericpreferenceandemotionregulationdifficulties