Cargando…

Validation of the unassisted, gum-elastic bougie-guided, laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ placement technique in anaesthetized patients

AIMS: The laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ can be inserted digitally, by introducer tool, or by railroading it over a bougie placed first in the patient's oesophagus, which is highly successful, but as originally described, requires an assistant. An unassisted bougie-guided placement technique ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joffe, Aaron M, Schroeder, Kristopher M, Shepler, John A, Galgon, Richard E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3425285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22923824
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.98771
_version_ 1782241356583796736
author Joffe, Aaron M
Schroeder, Kristopher M
Shepler, John A
Galgon, Richard E
author_facet Joffe, Aaron M
Schroeder, Kristopher M
Shepler, John A
Galgon, Richard E
author_sort Joffe, Aaron M
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ can be inserted digitally, by introducer tool, or by railroading it over a bougie placed first in the patient's oesophagus, which is highly successful, but as originally described, requires an assistant. An unassisted bougie-guided placement technique has also been described, but no data on its effectiveness have been reported. METHODS: We reviewed data collected during a randomized, controlled trial comparing the air-Q(®) Intubating Laryngeal Airway and LMA-Proseal™, in which all LMA-Proseal™ devices were inserted using the unassisted (one-operator), bougie-guided placement technique. RESULTS: Forty-eight devices were placed. All devices were placed successfully. Successful placement was achieved in 47 (98%) patients on first attempt and in one (2%) patient on the third attempt. Mean (SD) time required for insertion establishing ventilation was 28 (11) s. Mean (SD) airway seal pressure was 30 (6) cmH(2)O. Gross blood was found on four (8%) devices upon removal, but no oropharyngeal injuries were noted on oral exam in the recovery unit prior to discharge. The most common complaints in recovery and 24 h post-operatively were sore throat [discharge: mild = 18/48 (38%); 24 h: mild = 9/38 (19%), moderate = 1/38 (3%)] and pain on swallowing [discharge: mild = 7/48 (15%); 24 h: mild = 2/38 (6%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that in experienced hands, bougie-guided placement of the LMA-Proseal™ without the aid of an assistant can be accomplished quickly and successfully without affecting the expected clinical performance of the device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3425285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34252852012-08-24 Validation of the unassisted, gum-elastic bougie-guided, laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ placement technique in anaesthetized patients Joffe, Aaron M Schroeder, Kristopher M Shepler, John A Galgon, Richard E Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation AIMS: The laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ can be inserted digitally, by introducer tool, or by railroading it over a bougie placed first in the patient's oesophagus, which is highly successful, but as originally described, requires an assistant. An unassisted bougie-guided placement technique has also been described, but no data on its effectiveness have been reported. METHODS: We reviewed data collected during a randomized, controlled trial comparing the air-Q(®) Intubating Laryngeal Airway and LMA-Proseal™, in which all LMA-Proseal™ devices were inserted using the unassisted (one-operator), bougie-guided placement technique. RESULTS: Forty-eight devices were placed. All devices were placed successfully. Successful placement was achieved in 47 (98%) patients on first attempt and in one (2%) patient on the third attempt. Mean (SD) time required for insertion establishing ventilation was 28 (11) s. Mean (SD) airway seal pressure was 30 (6) cmH(2)O. Gross blood was found on four (8%) devices upon removal, but no oropharyngeal injuries were noted on oral exam in the recovery unit prior to discharge. The most common complaints in recovery and 24 h post-operatively were sore throat [discharge: mild = 18/48 (38%); 24 h: mild = 9/38 (19%), moderate = 1/38 (3%)] and pain on swallowing [discharge: mild = 7/48 (15%); 24 h: mild = 2/38 (6%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that in experienced hands, bougie-guided placement of the LMA-Proseal™ without the aid of an assistant can be accomplished quickly and successfully without affecting the expected clinical performance of the device. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3425285/ /pubmed/22923824 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.98771 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Joffe, Aaron M
Schroeder, Kristopher M
Shepler, John A
Galgon, Richard E
Validation of the unassisted, gum-elastic bougie-guided, laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ placement technique in anaesthetized patients
title Validation of the unassisted, gum-elastic bougie-guided, laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ placement technique in anaesthetized patients
title_full Validation of the unassisted, gum-elastic bougie-guided, laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ placement technique in anaesthetized patients
title_fullStr Validation of the unassisted, gum-elastic bougie-guided, laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ placement technique in anaesthetized patients
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the unassisted, gum-elastic bougie-guided, laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ placement technique in anaesthetized patients
title_short Validation of the unassisted, gum-elastic bougie-guided, laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ placement technique in anaesthetized patients
title_sort validation of the unassisted, gum-elastic bougie-guided, laryngeal mask airway-proseal™ placement technique in anaesthetized patients
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3425285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22923824
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.98771
work_keys_str_mv AT joffeaaronm validationoftheunassistedgumelasticbougieguidedlaryngealmaskairwayprosealplacementtechniqueinanaesthetizedpatients
AT schroederkristopherm validationoftheunassistedgumelasticbougieguidedlaryngealmaskairwayprosealplacementtechniqueinanaesthetizedpatients
AT sheplerjohna validationoftheunassistedgumelasticbougieguidedlaryngealmaskairwayprosealplacementtechniqueinanaesthetizedpatients
AT galgonricharde validationoftheunassistedgumelasticbougieguidedlaryngealmaskairwayprosealplacementtechniqueinanaesthetizedpatients