Cargando…
How long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? Multivariate analysis of cohort data from Matlab, Bangladesh
OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimum interpregnancy interval (IPI) following a miscarriage. DESIGN: Multivariate analysis of population-based, prospective data from a demographic surveillance system. SETTING: Pregnancies in Matlab, Bangladesh, between 1977 and 2008. PARTICIPANTS: 9214 women with 10 4...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3425891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22907047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001591 |
_version_ | 1782241431163764736 |
---|---|
author | DaVanzo, Julie Hale, Lauren Rahman, Mizanur |
author_facet | DaVanzo, Julie Hale, Lauren Rahman, Mizanur |
author_sort | DaVanzo, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimum interpregnancy interval (IPI) following a miscarriage. DESIGN: Multivariate analysis of population-based, prospective data from a demographic surveillance system. SETTING: Pregnancies in Matlab, Bangladesh, between 1977 and 2008. PARTICIPANTS: 9214 women with 10 453 pregnancies that ended in a miscarriage and were followed by another pregnancy outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome of pregnancy following the miscarriage was singleton live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage or induced abortion. For pregnancies that ended in live birth: early neonatal, late neonatal and postneonatal mortality. RESULTS: Compared with IPIs of 6–12 months, pregnancies that were conceived ≤3 months after a miscarriage were more likely to result in a live birth and less likely to result in a miscarriage (adjusted relative risk ratio (RRR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86) or induced abortion (0.50, 0.29 to 0.89). Induced abortions were significantly more likely following IPIs of 18–24 months (2.36, 1.48 to 3.76), 36–48 months (2.73, 1.50 to 4.94), and >48 months (3.32, 1.68 to 2.95), and miscarriages were more likely following IPIs of 12–17 months (1.25, 1.01 to 1.56) and >48 months (1.90, 1.40 to 2.58). No significant effects of IPI duration are seen on the risks of a stillbirth. However, IPIs≤3 months following a miscarriage are associated with significantly higher late neonatal mortality for the infant born at the end of the IPI (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.74, 1.06 to 2.84), and IPIs of 12–18 months are associated with a significantly lower unadjusted risk of postneonatal mortality (0.54, 0.30 to 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The shorter the IPI following a miscarriage, the more likely the subsequent pregnancy is to result in a live birth. However, very short IPIs may not be advisable following miscarriages in poor countries like Bangladesh because they are associated with a higher risk of mortality for the infants born after them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3425891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34258912012-08-30 How long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? Multivariate analysis of cohort data from Matlab, Bangladesh DaVanzo, Julie Hale, Lauren Rahman, Mizanur BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimum interpregnancy interval (IPI) following a miscarriage. DESIGN: Multivariate analysis of population-based, prospective data from a demographic surveillance system. SETTING: Pregnancies in Matlab, Bangladesh, between 1977 and 2008. PARTICIPANTS: 9214 women with 10 453 pregnancies that ended in a miscarriage and were followed by another pregnancy outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome of pregnancy following the miscarriage was singleton live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage or induced abortion. For pregnancies that ended in live birth: early neonatal, late neonatal and postneonatal mortality. RESULTS: Compared with IPIs of 6–12 months, pregnancies that were conceived ≤3 months after a miscarriage were more likely to result in a live birth and less likely to result in a miscarriage (adjusted relative risk ratio (RRR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86) or induced abortion (0.50, 0.29 to 0.89). Induced abortions were significantly more likely following IPIs of 18–24 months (2.36, 1.48 to 3.76), 36–48 months (2.73, 1.50 to 4.94), and >48 months (3.32, 1.68 to 2.95), and miscarriages were more likely following IPIs of 12–17 months (1.25, 1.01 to 1.56) and >48 months (1.90, 1.40 to 2.58). No significant effects of IPI duration are seen on the risks of a stillbirth. However, IPIs≤3 months following a miscarriage are associated with significantly higher late neonatal mortality for the infant born at the end of the IPI (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.74, 1.06 to 2.84), and IPIs of 12–18 months are associated with a significantly lower unadjusted risk of postneonatal mortality (0.54, 0.30 to 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The shorter the IPI following a miscarriage, the more likely the subsequent pregnancy is to result in a live birth. However, very short IPIs may not be advisable following miscarriages in poor countries like Bangladesh because they are associated with a higher risk of mortality for the infants born after them. BMJ Group 2012-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3425891/ /pubmed/22907047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001591 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology DaVanzo, Julie Hale, Lauren Rahman, Mizanur How long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? Multivariate analysis of cohort data from Matlab, Bangladesh |
title | How long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? Multivariate analysis of cohort data from Matlab, Bangladesh |
title_full | How long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? Multivariate analysis of cohort data from Matlab, Bangladesh |
title_fullStr | How long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? Multivariate analysis of cohort data from Matlab, Bangladesh |
title_full_unstemmed | How long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? Multivariate analysis of cohort data from Matlab, Bangladesh |
title_short | How long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? Multivariate analysis of cohort data from Matlab, Bangladesh |
title_sort | how long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? multivariate analysis of cohort data from matlab, bangladesh |
topic | Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3425891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22907047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davanzojulie howlongafteramiscarriageshouldwomenwaitbeforebecomingpregnantagainmultivariateanalysisofcohortdatafrommatlabbangladesh AT halelauren howlongafteramiscarriageshouldwomenwaitbeforebecomingpregnantagainmultivariateanalysisofcohortdatafrommatlabbangladesh AT rahmanmizanur howlongafteramiscarriageshouldwomenwaitbeforebecomingpregnantagainmultivariateanalysisofcohortdatafrommatlabbangladesh |