Cargando…

Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses

The leading patient complaint during the perioperative period for penile prosthesis implantation is postoperative pain, while emesis and urticaria also affect the procedure's perceived success. In analyzing surgical outcomes, assessment of the anesthetic for postoperative pain and side effects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henry, Gerard D., Saccà, Antonino, Eisenhart, Elizabeth, Cleves, Mario A., Kramer, Andrew C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3426176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22927841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/696752
_version_ 1782241476670914560
author Henry, Gerard D.
Saccà, Antonino
Eisenhart, Elizabeth
Cleves, Mario A.
Kramer, Andrew C.
author_facet Henry, Gerard D.
Saccà, Antonino
Eisenhart, Elizabeth
Cleves, Mario A.
Kramer, Andrew C.
author_sort Henry, Gerard D.
collection PubMed
description The leading patient complaint during the perioperative period for penile prosthesis implantation is postoperative pain, while emesis and urticaria also affect the procedure's perceived success. In analyzing surgical outcomes, assessment of the anesthetic for postoperative pain and side effects should be included. This paper retrospectively reviews 90 consecutive, primary inflatable penile prosthetic operations performed by a single surgeon at one private medical center. Fifty-seven patients were included in final analysis. Patients who had more than one procedure that day or who used chronic pain medication were excluded. The type and amount of each drug used for each respective side effect (within the first 24 hours after procedure) were compared to determine relative benefit. Twenty patients received general anesthesia (denoted herein as “GA”) and 37 received spinal (or also known as subarachnoid) anesthesia (denoted herein as “SA”). Patients receiving GA had significantly greater (P < 0.0001) occurrence and amount of intravenous pain treatment than those receiving SA. Patients with SA required less intravenous pain medication and less treatment for nausea/emesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3426176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34261762012-08-27 Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses Henry, Gerard D. Saccà, Antonino Eisenhart, Elizabeth Cleves, Mario A. Kramer, Andrew C. Adv Urol Research Article The leading patient complaint during the perioperative period for penile prosthesis implantation is postoperative pain, while emesis and urticaria also affect the procedure's perceived success. In analyzing surgical outcomes, assessment of the anesthetic for postoperative pain and side effects should be included. This paper retrospectively reviews 90 consecutive, primary inflatable penile prosthetic operations performed by a single surgeon at one private medical center. Fifty-seven patients were included in final analysis. Patients who had more than one procedure that day or who used chronic pain medication were excluded. The type and amount of each drug used for each respective side effect (within the first 24 hours after procedure) were compared to determine relative benefit. Twenty patients received general anesthesia (denoted herein as “GA”) and 37 received spinal (or also known as subarachnoid) anesthesia (denoted herein as “SA”). Patients receiving GA had significantly greater (P < 0.0001) occurrence and amount of intravenous pain treatment than those receiving SA. Patients with SA required less intravenous pain medication and less treatment for nausea/emesis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3426176/ /pubmed/22927841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/696752 Text en Copyright © 2012 Gerard D. Henry et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Henry, Gerard D.
Saccà, Antonino
Eisenhart, Elizabeth
Cleves, Mario A.
Kramer, Andrew C.
Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses
title Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses
title_full Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses
title_fullStr Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses
title_full_unstemmed Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses
title_short Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses
title_sort subarachnoid versus general anesthesia in penile prosthetic implantation: outcomes analyses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3426176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22927841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/696752
work_keys_str_mv AT henrygerardd subarachnoidversusgeneralanesthesiainpenileprostheticimplantationoutcomesanalyses
AT saccaantonino subarachnoidversusgeneralanesthesiainpenileprostheticimplantationoutcomesanalyses
AT eisenhartelizabeth subarachnoidversusgeneralanesthesiainpenileprostheticimplantationoutcomesanalyses
AT clevesmarioa subarachnoidversusgeneralanesthesiainpenileprostheticimplantationoutcomesanalyses
AT kramerandrewc subarachnoidversusgeneralanesthesiainpenileprostheticimplantationoutcomesanalyses