Cargando…

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) is not uncommon and has many clinical patterns, ranging from benign infiltrates to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome. There are two mechanisms involved in DILD, which are probably interdependent: one is direct, dose-dependent toxicity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Matsuno, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3426467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22651223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-39
_version_ 1782241510251560960
author Matsuno, Osamu
author_facet Matsuno, Osamu
author_sort Matsuno, Osamu
collection PubMed
description Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) is not uncommon and has many clinical patterns, ranging from benign infiltrates to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome. There are two mechanisms involved in DILD, which are probably interdependent: one is direct, dose-dependent toxicity and the other is immune-mediated. Cytotoxic lung injury may result from direct injury to pneumocytes or the alveolar capillary endothelium. Drugs can induce all types of immunological reactions described by Gell and Coombs; however, most reactions in immune-mediated DILD may be T cell-mediated. DILD can be difficult to diagnose; diagnosis is often possible by exclusion alone. Identifying the causative drug that induces an allergy or cytotoxicity is essential for preventing secondary reactions. One method to confirm the diagnosis of a drug-induced disease is re-exposure or re-test of the drug. However, clinicians are reluctant to place patients at further risk of illness, particularly in cases with severe drug-induced diseases. Assessment of cell-mediated immunity has recently increased, because verifying the presence or absence of drug-sensitized lymphocytes can aid in confirmation of drug-induced disease. Using peripheral blood samples from drug-allergic patients, the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) and the leukocyte migration test (LMT) can detect the presence of drug-sensitized T cells. However, these tests do not have a definite role in the diagnosis of DILD. This study explores the potential of these new tests and other similar tests in the diagnosis of DILD and provides a review of the relevant literature on this topic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3426467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34264672012-08-24 Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches Matsuno, Osamu Respir Res Review Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) is not uncommon and has many clinical patterns, ranging from benign infiltrates to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome. There are two mechanisms involved in DILD, which are probably interdependent: one is direct, dose-dependent toxicity and the other is immune-mediated. Cytotoxic lung injury may result from direct injury to pneumocytes or the alveolar capillary endothelium. Drugs can induce all types of immunological reactions described by Gell and Coombs; however, most reactions in immune-mediated DILD may be T cell-mediated. DILD can be difficult to diagnose; diagnosis is often possible by exclusion alone. Identifying the causative drug that induces an allergy or cytotoxicity is essential for preventing secondary reactions. One method to confirm the diagnosis of a drug-induced disease is re-exposure or re-test of the drug. However, clinicians are reluctant to place patients at further risk of illness, particularly in cases with severe drug-induced diseases. Assessment of cell-mediated immunity has recently increased, because verifying the presence or absence of drug-sensitized lymphocytes can aid in confirmation of drug-induced disease. Using peripheral blood samples from drug-allergic patients, the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) and the leukocyte migration test (LMT) can detect the presence of drug-sensitized T cells. However, these tests do not have a definite role in the diagnosis of DILD. This study explores the potential of these new tests and other similar tests in the diagnosis of DILD and provides a review of the relevant literature on this topic. BioMed Central 2012 2012-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3426467/ /pubmed/22651223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-39 Text en Copyright ©2012 Matsuno; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Matsuno, Osamu
Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches
title Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches
title_full Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches
title_fullStr Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches
title_full_unstemmed Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches
title_short Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches
title_sort drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3426467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22651223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-39
work_keys_str_mv AT matsunoosamu druginducedinterstitiallungdiseasemechanismsandbestdiagnosticapproaches