Cargando…
Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches
Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) is not uncommon and has many clinical patterns, ranging from benign infiltrates to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome. There are two mechanisms involved in DILD, which are probably interdependent: one is direct, dose-dependent toxicity...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3426467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22651223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-39 |
_version_ | 1782241510251560960 |
---|---|
author | Matsuno, Osamu |
author_facet | Matsuno, Osamu |
author_sort | Matsuno, Osamu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) is not uncommon and has many clinical patterns, ranging from benign infiltrates to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome. There are two mechanisms involved in DILD, which are probably interdependent: one is direct, dose-dependent toxicity and the other is immune-mediated. Cytotoxic lung injury may result from direct injury to pneumocytes or the alveolar capillary endothelium. Drugs can induce all types of immunological reactions described by Gell and Coombs; however, most reactions in immune-mediated DILD may be T cell-mediated. DILD can be difficult to diagnose; diagnosis is often possible by exclusion alone. Identifying the causative drug that induces an allergy or cytotoxicity is essential for preventing secondary reactions. One method to confirm the diagnosis of a drug-induced disease is re-exposure or re-test of the drug. However, clinicians are reluctant to place patients at further risk of illness, particularly in cases with severe drug-induced diseases. Assessment of cell-mediated immunity has recently increased, because verifying the presence or absence of drug-sensitized lymphocytes can aid in confirmation of drug-induced disease. Using peripheral blood samples from drug-allergic patients, the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) and the leukocyte migration test (LMT) can detect the presence of drug-sensitized T cells. However, these tests do not have a definite role in the diagnosis of DILD. This study explores the potential of these new tests and other similar tests in the diagnosis of DILD and provides a review of the relevant literature on this topic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3426467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34264672012-08-24 Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches Matsuno, Osamu Respir Res Review Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) is not uncommon and has many clinical patterns, ranging from benign infiltrates to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome. There are two mechanisms involved in DILD, which are probably interdependent: one is direct, dose-dependent toxicity and the other is immune-mediated. Cytotoxic lung injury may result from direct injury to pneumocytes or the alveolar capillary endothelium. Drugs can induce all types of immunological reactions described by Gell and Coombs; however, most reactions in immune-mediated DILD may be T cell-mediated. DILD can be difficult to diagnose; diagnosis is often possible by exclusion alone. Identifying the causative drug that induces an allergy or cytotoxicity is essential for preventing secondary reactions. One method to confirm the diagnosis of a drug-induced disease is re-exposure or re-test of the drug. However, clinicians are reluctant to place patients at further risk of illness, particularly in cases with severe drug-induced diseases. Assessment of cell-mediated immunity has recently increased, because verifying the presence or absence of drug-sensitized lymphocytes can aid in confirmation of drug-induced disease. Using peripheral blood samples from drug-allergic patients, the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) and the leukocyte migration test (LMT) can detect the presence of drug-sensitized T cells. However, these tests do not have a definite role in the diagnosis of DILD. This study explores the potential of these new tests and other similar tests in the diagnosis of DILD and provides a review of the relevant literature on this topic. BioMed Central 2012 2012-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3426467/ /pubmed/22651223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-39 Text en Copyright ©2012 Matsuno; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Matsuno, Osamu Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches |
title | Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches |
title_full | Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches |
title_fullStr | Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches |
title_short | Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches |
title_sort | drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3426467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22651223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-13-39 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsunoosamu druginducedinterstitiallungdiseasemechanismsandbestdiagnosticapproaches |