Cargando…
Biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns
Past models have suggested host–parasite coextinction could lead to linear, or concave down relationships between free-living species richness and parasite richness. I explored several models for the relationship between parasite richness and biodiversity loss. Life cycle complexity, low generality...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3427564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22966137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0110 |
_version_ | 1782241619992379392 |
---|---|
author | Lafferty, Kevin D. |
author_facet | Lafferty, Kevin D. |
author_sort | Lafferty, Kevin D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Past models have suggested host–parasite coextinction could lead to linear, or concave down relationships between free-living species richness and parasite richness. I explored several models for the relationship between parasite richness and biodiversity loss. Life cycle complexity, low generality of parasites and sensitivity of hosts reduced the robustness of parasite species to the loss of free-living species diversity. Food-web complexity and the ordering of extinctions altered these relationships in unpredictable ways. Each disassembly of a food web resulted in a unique relationship between parasite richness and the richness of free-living species, because the extinction trajectory of parasites was sensitive to the order of extinctions of free-living species. However, the average of many disassemblies tended to approximate an analytical model. Parasites of specialist hosts and hosts higher on food chains were more likely to go extinct in food-web models. Furthermore, correlated extinctions between hosts and parasites (e.g. if parasites share a host with a specialist predator) led to steeper declines in parasite richness with biodiversity loss. In empirical food webs with random removals of free-living species, the relationship between free-living species richness and parasite richness was, on average, quasi-linear, suggesting biodiversity loss reduces parasite diversity more than previously thought. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3427564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34275642012-10-19 Biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns Lafferty, Kevin D. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Past models have suggested host–parasite coextinction could lead to linear, or concave down relationships between free-living species richness and parasite richness. I explored several models for the relationship between parasite richness and biodiversity loss. Life cycle complexity, low generality of parasites and sensitivity of hosts reduced the robustness of parasite species to the loss of free-living species diversity. Food-web complexity and the ordering of extinctions altered these relationships in unpredictable ways. Each disassembly of a food web resulted in a unique relationship between parasite richness and the richness of free-living species, because the extinction trajectory of parasites was sensitive to the order of extinctions of free-living species. However, the average of many disassemblies tended to approximate an analytical model. Parasites of specialist hosts and hosts higher on food chains were more likely to go extinct in food-web models. Furthermore, correlated extinctions between hosts and parasites (e.g. if parasites share a host with a specialist predator) led to steeper declines in parasite richness with biodiversity loss. In empirical food webs with random removals of free-living species, the relationship between free-living species richness and parasite richness was, on average, quasi-linear, suggesting biodiversity loss reduces parasite diversity more than previously thought. The Royal Society 2012-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3427564/ /pubmed/22966137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0110 Text en This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Lafferty, Kevin D. Biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns |
title | Biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns |
title_full | Biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns |
title_fullStr | Biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns |
title_full_unstemmed | Biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns |
title_short | Biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns |
title_sort | biodiversity loss decreases parasite diversity: theory and patterns |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3427564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22966137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laffertykevind biodiversitylossdecreasesparasitediversitytheoryandpatterns |