Cargando…

Retrieval analysis of Harris-Galante I and II acetabular liners in situ for more than 10 years

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have been few reports documenting the wear and oxidation performance of the polyethylene bearing surface of HGPI and HGPII THA devices. We evaluated retrieved HGPI and HGPII acetabular liners that had been in situ for more than 10 years and determined whether there was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: French, Keisha, Moore, Rebecca, Gawel, Heather, Kurtz, Steven M, Kraay, Matthew J, Xie, Ke, Goldberg, Victor M, Rimnac, Clare M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2012
Materias:
Hip
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3427627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22880709
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.717843
_version_ 1782241623723212800
author French, Keisha
Moore, Rebecca
Gawel, Heather
Kurtz, Steven M
Kraay, Matthew J
Xie, Ke
Goldberg, Victor M
Rimnac, Clare M
author_facet French, Keisha
Moore, Rebecca
Gawel, Heather
Kurtz, Steven M
Kraay, Matthew J
Xie, Ke
Goldberg, Victor M
Rimnac, Clare M
author_sort French, Keisha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have been few reports documenting the wear and oxidation performance of the polyethylene bearing surface of HGPI and HGPII THA devices. We evaluated retrieved HGPI and HGPII acetabular liners that had been in situ for more than 10 years and determined whether there was a relationship between clinical and radiographic factors, surface damage, wear, and oxidation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 129 HGPI and II acetabular liners with implantation times of > 10 years were retrieved at 4 institutions between 1997 and 2010. The liners were made from a single resin and were gamma radiation-sterilized in air. Surface damage, linear wear, and oxidation index (OI) were assessed. Differences in clinical and radiographic factors, surface damage, linear wear, and OI for the 2 designs were statistically evaluated separately and together. RESULTS: Articular surface damage and backside damage was similar in the 2 designs. The linear penetration rate was 0.14 (SD 0.07) mm/year for the HGPI liners and 0.12 (SD 0.08) mm/year for the HGPII liners. For both cohorts, the rim had a higher OI than the articular surface. 74% of the liners had subsurface cracking and 24% had a complete fracture through the acetabular rim. INTERPRETATION: Despite modification of the HGP locking mechanism in the HGPII design, dissociation of the liner from the acetabular shell can still occur if fracture of the rim of the liner develops due to oxidative degradation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3427627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34276272012-08-27 Retrieval analysis of Harris-Galante I and II acetabular liners in situ for more than 10 years French, Keisha Moore, Rebecca Gawel, Heather Kurtz, Steven M Kraay, Matthew J Xie, Ke Goldberg, Victor M Rimnac, Clare M Acta Orthop Hip BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have been few reports documenting the wear and oxidation performance of the polyethylene bearing surface of HGPI and HGPII THA devices. We evaluated retrieved HGPI and HGPII acetabular liners that had been in situ for more than 10 years and determined whether there was a relationship between clinical and radiographic factors, surface damage, wear, and oxidation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 129 HGPI and II acetabular liners with implantation times of > 10 years were retrieved at 4 institutions between 1997 and 2010. The liners were made from a single resin and were gamma radiation-sterilized in air. Surface damage, linear wear, and oxidation index (OI) were assessed. Differences in clinical and radiographic factors, surface damage, linear wear, and OI for the 2 designs were statistically evaluated separately and together. RESULTS: Articular surface damage and backside damage was similar in the 2 designs. The linear penetration rate was 0.14 (SD 0.07) mm/year for the HGPI liners and 0.12 (SD 0.08) mm/year for the HGPII liners. For both cohorts, the rim had a higher OI than the articular surface. 74% of the liners had subsurface cracking and 24% had a complete fracture through the acetabular rim. INTERPRETATION: Despite modification of the HGP locking mechanism in the HGPII design, dissociation of the liner from the acetabular shell can still occur if fracture of the rim of the liner develops due to oxidative degradation. Informa Healthcare 2012-08 2012-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3427627/ /pubmed/22880709 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.717843 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Hip
French, Keisha
Moore, Rebecca
Gawel, Heather
Kurtz, Steven M
Kraay, Matthew J
Xie, Ke
Goldberg, Victor M
Rimnac, Clare M
Retrieval analysis of Harris-Galante I and II acetabular liners in situ for more than 10 years
title Retrieval analysis of Harris-Galante I and II acetabular liners in situ for more than 10 years
title_full Retrieval analysis of Harris-Galante I and II acetabular liners in situ for more than 10 years
title_fullStr Retrieval analysis of Harris-Galante I and II acetabular liners in situ for more than 10 years
title_full_unstemmed Retrieval analysis of Harris-Galante I and II acetabular liners in situ for more than 10 years
title_short Retrieval analysis of Harris-Galante I and II acetabular liners in situ for more than 10 years
title_sort retrieval analysis of harris-galante i and ii acetabular liners in situ for more than 10 years
topic Hip
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3427627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22880709
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.717843
work_keys_str_mv AT frenchkeisha retrievalanalysisofharrisgalanteiandiiacetabularlinersinsituformorethan10years
AT moorerebecca retrievalanalysisofharrisgalanteiandiiacetabularlinersinsituformorethan10years
AT gawelheather retrievalanalysisofharrisgalanteiandiiacetabularlinersinsituformorethan10years
AT kurtzstevenm retrievalanalysisofharrisgalanteiandiiacetabularlinersinsituformorethan10years
AT kraaymatthewj retrievalanalysisofharrisgalanteiandiiacetabularlinersinsituformorethan10years
AT xieke retrievalanalysisofharrisgalanteiandiiacetabularlinersinsituformorethan10years
AT goldbergvictorm retrievalanalysisofharrisgalanteiandiiacetabularlinersinsituformorethan10years
AT rimnacclarem retrievalanalysisofharrisgalanteiandiiacetabularlinersinsituformorethan10years