Cargando…
Current Trends in the Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence
One of the annoying complications of radical prostatectomy is urinary incontinence. Post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) causes a significant impact on the patient's health-related quality of life. Although PPI is stress urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency in most cas...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3427833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22949993 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.8.511 |
_version_ | 1782241638487162880 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Joon Chul Cho, Kang Jun |
author_facet | Kim, Joon Chul Cho, Kang Jun |
author_sort | Kim, Joon Chul |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the annoying complications of radical prostatectomy is urinary incontinence. Post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) causes a significant impact on the patient's health-related quality of life. Although PPI is stress urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency in most cases, bladder dysfunction and vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis can induce urine leakage also. Exact clinical assessments, such as a voiding diary, incontinence questionnaire, pad test, urodynamic study, and urethrocystoscopy, are necessary to determine adequate treatment. The initial management of PPI is conservative treatment including lifestyle interventions, pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback, and bladder training. An early start of conservative treatment is recommended during the first year. If the conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment is recommended. Surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy can be divided into minimally invasive and invasive treatments. Minimally invasive treatment includes injection of urethral bulking agents, male suburethral sling, and adjustable continence balloons. Invasive treatment includes artificial urinary sphincter implantation, which is still the gold standard and the most effective treatment of PPI. However, the demand for minimally invasive treatment is increasing, and many urologists consider male suburethral slings to be an acceptable treatment for PPI. The male sling is usually recommended for patients with persistent mild or moderate incontinence. It is necessary to improve our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of PPI and to compare different procedures for the development of new and potentially better treatment options. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3427833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Korean Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34278332012-09-04 Current Trends in the Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence Kim, Joon Chul Cho, Kang Jun Korean J Urol Review Article One of the annoying complications of radical prostatectomy is urinary incontinence. Post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) causes a significant impact on the patient's health-related quality of life. Although PPI is stress urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency in most cases, bladder dysfunction and vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis can induce urine leakage also. Exact clinical assessments, such as a voiding diary, incontinence questionnaire, pad test, urodynamic study, and urethrocystoscopy, are necessary to determine adequate treatment. The initial management of PPI is conservative treatment including lifestyle interventions, pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback, and bladder training. An early start of conservative treatment is recommended during the first year. If the conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment is recommended. Surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy can be divided into minimally invasive and invasive treatments. Minimally invasive treatment includes injection of urethral bulking agents, male suburethral sling, and adjustable continence balloons. Invasive treatment includes artificial urinary sphincter implantation, which is still the gold standard and the most effective treatment of PPI. However, the demand for minimally invasive treatment is increasing, and many urologists consider male suburethral slings to be an acceptable treatment for PPI. The male sling is usually recommended for patients with persistent mild or moderate incontinence. It is necessary to improve our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of PPI and to compare different procedures for the development of new and potentially better treatment options. The Korean Urological Association 2012-08 2012-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3427833/ /pubmed/22949993 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.8.511 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Kim, Joon Chul Cho, Kang Jun Current Trends in the Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence |
title | Current Trends in the Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence |
title_full | Current Trends in the Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence |
title_fullStr | Current Trends in the Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Trends in the Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence |
title_short | Current Trends in the Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence |
title_sort | current trends in the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3427833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22949993 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.8.511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjoonchul currenttrendsinthemanagementofpostprostatectomyincontinence AT chokangjun currenttrendsinthemanagementofpostprostatectomyincontinence |