Cargando…

Lung Function Measurements in Rodents in Safety Pharmacology Studies

The ICH guideline S7A requires safety pharmacology tests including measurements of pulmonary function. In the first step – as part of the “core battery” – lung function tests in conscious animals are requested. If potential adverse effects raise concern for human safety, these should be explored in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hoymann, Heinz Gerd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3428707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22973226
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00156
_version_ 1782241733335056384
author Hoymann, Heinz Gerd
author_facet Hoymann, Heinz Gerd
author_sort Hoymann, Heinz Gerd
collection PubMed
description The ICH guideline S7A requires safety pharmacology tests including measurements of pulmonary function. In the first step – as part of the “core battery” – lung function tests in conscious animals are requested. If potential adverse effects raise concern for human safety, these should be explored in a second step as a “follow-up study”. For these two stages of safety pharmacology testing, both non-invasive and invasive techniques are needed which should be as precise and reliable as possible. A short overview of typical in vivo measurement techniques is given, their advantages and disadvantages are discussed and out of these the non-invasive head-out body plethysmography and the invasive but repeatable body plethysmography in orotracheally intubated rodents are presented in detail. For validation purposes the changes in the respective parameters such as tidal midexpiratory flow (EF(50)) or lung resistance have been recorded in the same animals in typical bronchoconstriction models and compared. In addition, the technique of head-out body plethysmography has been shown to be useful to measure lung function in juvenile rats starting from day two of age. This allows safety pharmacology testing and toxicological studies in juvenile animals as a model for the young developing organism as requested by the regulatory authorities (e.g., EMEA Guideline 1/2008). It is concluded that both invasive and non-invasive pulmonary function tests are capable of detecting effects and alterations on the respiratory system with different selectivity and area of operation. The use of both techniques in a large number of studies in mice and rats in the last years have demonstrated that they provide useful and reliable information on pulmonary mechanics in safety pharmacology and toxicology testing, in investigations of respiratory disorders, and in pharmacological efficacy studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3428707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34287072012-09-12 Lung Function Measurements in Rodents in Safety Pharmacology Studies Hoymann, Heinz Gerd Front Pharmacol Pharmacology The ICH guideline S7A requires safety pharmacology tests including measurements of pulmonary function. In the first step – as part of the “core battery” – lung function tests in conscious animals are requested. If potential adverse effects raise concern for human safety, these should be explored in a second step as a “follow-up study”. For these two stages of safety pharmacology testing, both non-invasive and invasive techniques are needed which should be as precise and reliable as possible. A short overview of typical in vivo measurement techniques is given, their advantages and disadvantages are discussed and out of these the non-invasive head-out body plethysmography and the invasive but repeatable body plethysmography in orotracheally intubated rodents are presented in detail. For validation purposes the changes in the respective parameters such as tidal midexpiratory flow (EF(50)) or lung resistance have been recorded in the same animals in typical bronchoconstriction models and compared. In addition, the technique of head-out body plethysmography has been shown to be useful to measure lung function in juvenile rats starting from day two of age. This allows safety pharmacology testing and toxicological studies in juvenile animals as a model for the young developing organism as requested by the regulatory authorities (e.g., EMEA Guideline 1/2008). It is concluded that both invasive and non-invasive pulmonary function tests are capable of detecting effects and alterations on the respiratory system with different selectivity and area of operation. The use of both techniques in a large number of studies in mice and rats in the last years have demonstrated that they provide useful and reliable information on pulmonary mechanics in safety pharmacology and toxicology testing, in investigations of respiratory disorders, and in pharmacological efficacy studies. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3428707/ /pubmed/22973226 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00156 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hoymann. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Hoymann, Heinz Gerd
Lung Function Measurements in Rodents in Safety Pharmacology Studies
title Lung Function Measurements in Rodents in Safety Pharmacology Studies
title_full Lung Function Measurements in Rodents in Safety Pharmacology Studies
title_fullStr Lung Function Measurements in Rodents in Safety Pharmacology Studies
title_full_unstemmed Lung Function Measurements in Rodents in Safety Pharmacology Studies
title_short Lung Function Measurements in Rodents in Safety Pharmacology Studies
title_sort lung function measurements in rodents in safety pharmacology studies
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3428707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22973226
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00156
work_keys_str_mv AT hoymannheinzgerd lungfunctionmeasurementsinrodentsinsafetypharmacologystudies