Cargando…
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
Current scholarly publications heavily rely on high quality peer review. Peer review, albeit imperfect, is aimed at improving science writing and editing. Evidence supporting peer review as a guarantor of the quality of biomedical publications is currently lacking. Its outcomes are largely dependent...
Autores principales: | Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, Kitas, George D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Croatian Medical Schools
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3428827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22911533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2012.53.386 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Biomedical journal editing: elements of success
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
Publicado: (2013) -
Publication ethics standards should be the same for all peer-reviewed journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
Publicado: (2017) -
Rewarding Peer Reviewers: Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2015)