Cargando…

Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention

BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) is imperative for effective selective attention. Distractibility is greater under conditions of high (vs. low) concurrent working memory load (WML), and in individuals with low (vs. high) working memory capacity (WMC). In the current experiments, we recorded the flank...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Lubna, de Fockert, Jan W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22952636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043101
_version_ 1782241798453723136
author Ahmed, Lubna
de Fockert, Jan W.
author_facet Ahmed, Lubna
de Fockert, Jan W.
author_sort Ahmed, Lubna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) is imperative for effective selective attention. Distractibility is greater under conditions of high (vs. low) concurrent working memory load (WML), and in individuals with low (vs. high) working memory capacity (WMC). In the current experiments, we recorded the flanker task performance of individuals with high and low WMC during low and high WML, to investigate the combined effect of WML and WMC on selective attention. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In Experiment 1, distractibility from a distractor at a fixed distance from the target was greater when either WML was high or WMC was low, but surprisingly smaller when both WML was high and WMC low. Thus we observed an inverted-U relationship between reductions in WM resources and distractibility. In Experiment 2, we mapped the distribution of spatial attention as a function of WMC and WML, by recording distractibility across several target-to-distractor distances. The pattern of distractor effects across the target-to-distractor distances demonstrated that the distribution of the attentional window becomes dispersed as WM resources are limited. The attentional window was more spread out under high compared to low WML, and for low compared to high WMC individuals, and even more so when the two factors co-occurred (i.e., under high WML in low WMC individuals). The inverted-U pattern of distractibility effects in Experiment 1, replicated in Experiment 2, can thus be explained by differences in the spread of the attentional window as a function of WM resource availability. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The current findings show that limitations in WM resources, due to either WML or individual differences in WMC, affect the spatial distribution of attention. The difference in attentional constraining between high and low WMC individuals demonstrated in the current experiments helps characterise the nature of previously established associations between WMC and controlled attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3429456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34294562012-09-05 Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention Ahmed, Lubna de Fockert, Jan W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) is imperative for effective selective attention. Distractibility is greater under conditions of high (vs. low) concurrent working memory load (WML), and in individuals with low (vs. high) working memory capacity (WMC). In the current experiments, we recorded the flanker task performance of individuals with high and low WMC during low and high WML, to investigate the combined effect of WML and WMC on selective attention. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In Experiment 1, distractibility from a distractor at a fixed distance from the target was greater when either WML was high or WMC was low, but surprisingly smaller when both WML was high and WMC low. Thus we observed an inverted-U relationship between reductions in WM resources and distractibility. In Experiment 2, we mapped the distribution of spatial attention as a function of WMC and WML, by recording distractibility across several target-to-distractor distances. The pattern of distractor effects across the target-to-distractor distances demonstrated that the distribution of the attentional window becomes dispersed as WM resources are limited. The attentional window was more spread out under high compared to low WML, and for low compared to high WMC individuals, and even more so when the two factors co-occurred (i.e., under high WML in low WMC individuals). The inverted-U pattern of distractibility effects in Experiment 1, replicated in Experiment 2, can thus be explained by differences in the spread of the attentional window as a function of WM resource availability. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The current findings show that limitations in WM resources, due to either WML or individual differences in WMC, affect the spatial distribution of attention. The difference in attentional constraining between high and low WMC individuals demonstrated in the current experiments helps characterise the nature of previously established associations between WMC and controlled attention. Public Library of Science 2012-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3429456/ /pubmed/22952636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043101 Text en © 2012 Ahmed, de Fockert http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ahmed, Lubna
de Fockert, Jan W.
Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention
title Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention
title_full Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention
title_fullStr Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention
title_full_unstemmed Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention
title_short Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention
title_sort focusing on attention: the effects of working memory capacity and load on selective attention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22952636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043101
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedlubna focusingonattentiontheeffectsofworkingmemorycapacityandloadonselectiveattention
AT defockertjanw focusingonattentiontheeffectsofworkingmemorycapacityandloadonselectiveattention