Cargando…

The comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries

BACKGROUND: Opioid and local anesthetic infusion by an epidural catheter is widely used as a postoperative pain management method after major abdominal surgeries. There are several agents nowadays to provide sufficient analgesia. The agents which cause less side effects but better quality of analges...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uzuner, Ali, Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga, Saracoglu, Ayten, Erdemli, Ozcan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3430040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22973384
_version_ 1782241891065004032
author Uzuner, Ali
Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga
Saracoglu, Ayten
Erdemli, Ozcan
author_facet Uzuner, Ali
Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga
Saracoglu, Ayten
Erdemli, Ozcan
author_sort Uzuner, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Opioid and local anesthetic infusion by an epidural catheter is widely used as a postoperative pain management method after major abdominal surgeries. There are several agents nowadays to provide sufficient analgesia. The agents which cause less side effects but better quality of analgesia are more valuable. We aimed to postoperatively compare the analgesic, hemodynamic and arrhythmogenic effects of epidural levobupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl solutions. METHODS: Fifty patients were scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery in this clinical trial. The parameters were recorded pre- and post-operatively. In Group I (n=25), bupivacaine with fentanyl solution and in Group II (n=25), levobupivacaine with fentanyl solution was infused via epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). According to the preoperative and postoperative holter recording reports, the arrhythmogenic effects were examined in four catagories: ventricular arrhythmia (VA), supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA), atrioventricular conduction abnormalities and pauses longer than two seconds. RESULTS: Mean visual analog scale (VAS) values of groups did not differ at all time. They were 6 at the end of the surgery (0. Min, p = 0.622). The scores were 5 in Group I and 4 in Group II in 30. min (p = 0.301). The frequency of SVA was higher in bupivacaine group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that same concentration of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl provide stable postoperative analgesia and both were found safe for the patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3430040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34300402012-09-12 The comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries Uzuner, Ali Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga Saracoglu, Ayten Erdemli, Ozcan J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Opioid and local anesthetic infusion by an epidural catheter is widely used as a postoperative pain management method after major abdominal surgeries. There are several agents nowadays to provide sufficient analgesia. The agents which cause less side effects but better quality of analgesia are more valuable. We aimed to postoperatively compare the analgesic, hemodynamic and arrhythmogenic effects of epidural levobupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl solutions. METHODS: Fifty patients were scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery in this clinical trial. The parameters were recorded pre- and post-operatively. In Group I (n=25), bupivacaine with fentanyl solution and in Group II (n=25), levobupivacaine with fentanyl solution was infused via epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). According to the preoperative and postoperative holter recording reports, the arrhythmogenic effects were examined in four catagories: ventricular arrhythmia (VA), supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA), atrioventricular conduction abnormalities and pauses longer than two seconds. RESULTS: Mean visual analog scale (VAS) values of groups did not differ at all time. They were 6 at the end of the surgery (0. Min, p = 0.622). The scores were 5 in Group I and 4 in Group II in 30. min (p = 0.301). The frequency of SVA was higher in bupivacaine group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that same concentration of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl provide stable postoperative analgesia and both were found safe for the patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3430040/ /pubmed/22973384 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Uzuner, Ali
Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga
Saracoglu, Ayten
Erdemli, Ozcan
The comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries
title The comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries
title_full The comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries
title_fullStr The comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries
title_full_unstemmed The comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries
title_short The comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries
title_sort comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3430040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22973384
work_keys_str_mv AT uzunerali thecomparativestudyofepidurallevobupivacaineandbupivacaineinmajorabdominalsurgeries
AT saracoglukemaltolga thecomparativestudyofepidurallevobupivacaineandbupivacaineinmajorabdominalsurgeries
AT saracogluayten thecomparativestudyofepidurallevobupivacaineandbupivacaineinmajorabdominalsurgeries
AT erdemliozcan thecomparativestudyofepidurallevobupivacaineandbupivacaineinmajorabdominalsurgeries
AT uzunerali comparativestudyofepidurallevobupivacaineandbupivacaineinmajorabdominalsurgeries
AT saracoglukemaltolga comparativestudyofepidurallevobupivacaineandbupivacaineinmajorabdominalsurgeries
AT saracogluayten comparativestudyofepidurallevobupivacaineandbupivacaineinmajorabdominalsurgeries
AT erdemliozcan comparativestudyofepidurallevobupivacaineandbupivacaineinmajorabdominalsurgeries