Cargando…

The nature and consequences of coinfection in humans

OBJECTIVE: Many fundamental patterns of coinfection (multi-species infections) are undescribed, including the relative frequency of coinfection by various pathogens, differences between single-species infections and coinfection, and the burden of coinfection on human health. We aimed to address the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffiths, Emily C., Pedersen, Amy B., Fenton, Andy, Petchey, Owen L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: W.B. Saunders 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3430964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21704071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2011.06.005
_version_ 1782242009602326528
author Griffiths, Emily C.
Pedersen, Amy B.
Fenton, Andy
Petchey, Owen L.
author_facet Griffiths, Emily C.
Pedersen, Amy B.
Fenton, Andy
Petchey, Owen L.
author_sort Griffiths, Emily C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Many fundamental patterns of coinfection (multi-species infections) are undescribed, including the relative frequency of coinfection by various pathogens, differences between single-species infections and coinfection, and the burden of coinfection on human health. We aimed to address the paucity of general knowledge on coinfection by systematically collating and analysing data from recent publications to understand the types of coinfection and their effects. METHODS: From an electronic search to find all publications from 2009 on coinfection and its synonyms in humans we recorded data on i) coinfecting pathogens and their effect on ii) host health and iii) intensity of infection. RESULTS: The most commonly reported coinfections differ from infections causing highest global mortality, with a notable lack of serious childhood infections in reported coinfections. We found that coinfection is generally reported to worsen human health (76% publications) and exacerbate infections (57% publications). Reported coinfections included all kinds of pathogens, but were most likely to contain bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest differences between coinfected patients and those with single infections, with coinfection having serious health effects. There is a pressing need to quantify the tendency towards negative effects and to evaluate any sampling biases in the coverage of coinfection research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3430964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher W.B. Saunders
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34309642012-09-05 The nature and consequences of coinfection in humans Griffiths, Emily C. Pedersen, Amy B. Fenton, Andy Petchey, Owen L. J Infect Article OBJECTIVE: Many fundamental patterns of coinfection (multi-species infections) are undescribed, including the relative frequency of coinfection by various pathogens, differences between single-species infections and coinfection, and the burden of coinfection on human health. We aimed to address the paucity of general knowledge on coinfection by systematically collating and analysing data from recent publications to understand the types of coinfection and their effects. METHODS: From an electronic search to find all publications from 2009 on coinfection and its synonyms in humans we recorded data on i) coinfecting pathogens and their effect on ii) host health and iii) intensity of infection. RESULTS: The most commonly reported coinfections differ from infections causing highest global mortality, with a notable lack of serious childhood infections in reported coinfections. We found that coinfection is generally reported to worsen human health (76% publications) and exacerbate infections (57% publications). Reported coinfections included all kinds of pathogens, but were most likely to contain bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest differences between coinfected patients and those with single infections, with coinfection having serious health effects. There is a pressing need to quantify the tendency towards negative effects and to evaluate any sampling biases in the coverage of coinfection research. W.B. Saunders 2011-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3430964/ /pubmed/21704071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2011.06.005 Text en © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Griffiths, Emily C.
Pedersen, Amy B.
Fenton, Andy
Petchey, Owen L.
The nature and consequences of coinfection in humans
title The nature and consequences of coinfection in humans
title_full The nature and consequences of coinfection in humans
title_fullStr The nature and consequences of coinfection in humans
title_full_unstemmed The nature and consequences of coinfection in humans
title_short The nature and consequences of coinfection in humans
title_sort nature and consequences of coinfection in humans
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3430964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21704071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2011.06.005
work_keys_str_mv AT griffithsemilyc thenatureandconsequencesofcoinfectioninhumans
AT pedersenamyb thenatureandconsequencesofcoinfectioninhumans
AT fentonandy thenatureandconsequencesofcoinfectioninhumans
AT petcheyowenl thenatureandconsequencesofcoinfectioninhumans
AT griffithsemilyc natureandconsequencesofcoinfectioninhumans
AT pedersenamyb natureandconsequencesofcoinfectioninhumans
AT fentonandy natureandconsequencesofcoinfectioninhumans
AT petcheyowenl natureandconsequencesofcoinfectioninhumans