Cargando…

Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Hunter, Jane
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:	Neuroscience
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22969719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00063

Ejemplares similares

Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
por: Florian, Răzvan V.
Publicado: (2012)

Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science
por: Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
Publicado: (2012)

Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation
por: Pöschl, Ulrich
Publicado: (2012)

ChatGPT identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review
por: Verharen, Jeroen PH
Publicado: (2023)

Peer review in open access scientific journals
por: Falagas, Matthew E
Publicado: (2007)

Peer review: Heart and soul of scientific publication
por: Jain, Anil K
Publicado: (2009)

Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network
por: Lee, Christopher
Publicado: (2012)

Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review
por: Sandewall, Erik
Publicado: (2012)

Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide
por: Kelly, Jacalyn, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Principles of scientific research conduct, peer review, and publication: an editor’s perspective
por: Marian, Ali J.
Publicado: (2022)

Editorial: Peer review vs. open posting
Publicado: (2012)

Tracking Replicability as a Method of Post-Publication Open Evaluation
por: Hartshorne, Joshua K., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The purpose of peer review in the case of an open-access publication
por: Alexandrov, Georgii A
Publicado: (2006)

Learning from open source software projects to improve scientific review
por: Ghosh, Satrajit S., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing
por: Besançon, Lonni, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Virtual slides in peer reviewed, open access medical publication
por: Kayser, Klaus, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

What More Can We Do in Peer Review to Achieve Equity in Scientific Publication?
por: Hu, Xiaojing
Publicado: (2022)

The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Publicado: (2013)

A streamlined workflow for conversion, peer review, and publication of genomics metadata as omics data papers
por: Dimitrova, Mariya, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Open research practices: unintended consequences and suggestions for averting them. (Commentary on the Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative)
por: Bishop, D. V. M.
Publicado: (2016)

An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing
por: Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
por: Morey, Richard D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association
por: Ietto-Gillies, Grazia
Publicado: (2012)

A new age of peer reviewed scientific journals
por: Adler, John R.
Publicado: (2012)

Appreciations to Peer Reviewers in 2016: Contributions for the Scientific Community
por: Hong, Sung-Tae
Publicado: (2017)

The impact of peer review on the contribution potential of scientific papers
por: Matsui, Akira, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Scientific peer reviewing: practical hints and best practices
por: Spyns, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Opening up Peer Review in Life: Towards a Transparent and Reliable Process
por: Rampelotto, Pabulo Henrique
Publicado: (2014)

Peer reviewers for JACEP Open
Publicado: (2020)

PEERS — An Open Science “Platform for the Exchange of Experimental Research Standards” in Biomedicine
por: Sil, Annesha, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Emerging trends in peer review—a survey
por: Walker, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
por: Femia, Elia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Open access, open data and peer review
por: Ule, Jernej
Publicado: (2020)

An Analysis of Preliminary and Post-Discussion Priority Scores for Grant Applications Peer Reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH
por: Martin, Michael R., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Peer review and the publication process
por: Ali, Parveen Azam, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Peer review and publication delay
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2019)

Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication
por: Kovanis, Michail, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Peer Review and Publication of Research Protocols and Proposals: A Role for Open Access Journals
por: Eysenbach, Gunther
Publicado: (2004)

How to identify peer-reviewed publications: Open-identity labels in scholarly book publishing
por: Kulczycki, Emanuel, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Open semantic annotation of scientific publications using DOMEO
por: Ciccarese, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_6daf5qugm7pqr0v72igk837s1f