Cargando…

Prehospital Medication Administration: A Randomised Study Comparing Intranasal and Intravenous Routes

Introduction. Opioid overdose is an ever-increasing problem globally. Recent studies have demonstrated that intranasal (IN) naloxone is a safe and effective alternative to traditional routes of naloxone administration for reversal of opioid overdose. Aims. This randomised controlled trial aimed to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDermott, Cian, Collins, Niamh C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22953064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/476161
_version_ 1782242025931800576
author McDermott, Cian
Collins, Niamh C.
author_facet McDermott, Cian
Collins, Niamh C.
author_sort McDermott, Cian
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Opioid overdose is an ever-increasing problem globally. Recent studies have demonstrated that intranasal (IN) naloxone is a safe and effective alternative to traditional routes of naloxone administration for reversal of opioid overdose. Aims. This randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the time taken to deliver intranasal medication with that of intravenous (IV) medication by advanced paramedic trainees. Methods. 18 advanced paramedic trainees administered either an IN or IV medication to a mannequin model in a classroom-based setting. The time taken for medication delivery was compared. End-user satisfaction was assessed using a 5-point questionnaire regarding ease of use and safety for both routes. Results. The mean time taken for the IN and IV group was 87.1 seconds and 178.2 seconds respectively. The difference in mean time taken was 91.1 seconds (95% confidence interval 55.2 seconds to 126.9 seconds, P ≤ 0.0001). 89% of advanced paramedic trainees reported that the IN route was easier and safer to use than the IV route. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that, amongst advanced paramedic trainees, the IN route of medication administration is significantly faster, better accepted and perceived to be safer than using the IV route. Thus, IN medication administration could be considered more frequently when administering emergency medications in a pre-hospital setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3431081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34310812012-09-05 Prehospital Medication Administration: A Randomised Study Comparing Intranasal and Intravenous Routes McDermott, Cian Collins, Niamh C. Emerg Med Int Research Article Introduction. Opioid overdose is an ever-increasing problem globally. Recent studies have demonstrated that intranasal (IN) naloxone is a safe and effective alternative to traditional routes of naloxone administration for reversal of opioid overdose. Aims. This randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the time taken to deliver intranasal medication with that of intravenous (IV) medication by advanced paramedic trainees. Methods. 18 advanced paramedic trainees administered either an IN or IV medication to a mannequin model in a classroom-based setting. The time taken for medication delivery was compared. End-user satisfaction was assessed using a 5-point questionnaire regarding ease of use and safety for both routes. Results. The mean time taken for the IN and IV group was 87.1 seconds and 178.2 seconds respectively. The difference in mean time taken was 91.1 seconds (95% confidence interval 55.2 seconds to 126.9 seconds, P ≤ 0.0001). 89% of advanced paramedic trainees reported that the IN route was easier and safer to use than the IV route. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that, amongst advanced paramedic trainees, the IN route of medication administration is significantly faster, better accepted and perceived to be safer than using the IV route. Thus, IN medication administration could be considered more frequently when administering emergency medications in a pre-hospital setting. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3431081/ /pubmed/22953064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/476161 Text en Copyright © 2012 C. McDermott and N. C. Collins. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McDermott, Cian
Collins, Niamh C.
Prehospital Medication Administration: A Randomised Study Comparing Intranasal and Intravenous Routes
title Prehospital Medication Administration: A Randomised Study Comparing Intranasal and Intravenous Routes
title_full Prehospital Medication Administration: A Randomised Study Comparing Intranasal and Intravenous Routes
title_fullStr Prehospital Medication Administration: A Randomised Study Comparing Intranasal and Intravenous Routes
title_full_unstemmed Prehospital Medication Administration: A Randomised Study Comparing Intranasal and Intravenous Routes
title_short Prehospital Medication Administration: A Randomised Study Comparing Intranasal and Intravenous Routes
title_sort prehospital medication administration: a randomised study comparing intranasal and intravenous routes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22953064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/476161
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdermottcian prehospitalmedicationadministrationarandomisedstudycomparingintranasalandintravenousroutes
AT collinsniamhc prehospitalmedicationadministrationarandomisedstudycomparingintranasalandintravenousroutes