Cargando…
Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial
Objective To determine if a low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy could reduce the incidence of macrosomia in an at risk group. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Participants 800 women without diabetes, all in their second pregnancy between January 20...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22936795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5605 |
_version_ | 1782242055963017216 |
---|---|
author | Walsh, Jennifer M McGowan, Ciara A Mahony, Rhona Foley, Michael E McAuliffe, Fionnuala M |
author_facet | Walsh, Jennifer M McGowan, Ciara A Mahony, Rhona Foley, Michael E McAuliffe, Fionnuala M |
author_sort | Walsh, Jennifer M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To determine if a low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy could reduce the incidence of macrosomia in an at risk group. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Participants 800 women without diabetes, all in their second pregnancy between January 2007 to January 2011, having previously delivered an infant weighing greater than 4 kg. Intervention Women were randomised to receive no dietary intervention or start on a low glycaemic index diet from early pregnancy. Main outcomes The primary outcome measure was difference in birth weight. The secondary outcome measure was difference in gestational weight gain. Results No significant difference was seen between the two groups in absolute birth weight, birthweight centile, or ponderal index. Significantly less gestational weight gain occurred in women in the intervention arm (12.2 v 13.7 kg; mean difference −1.3, 95% confidence interval −2.4 to −0.2; P=0.01). The rate of glucose intolerance was also lower in the intervention arm: 21% (67/320) compared with 28% (100/352) of controls had a fasting glucose of 5.1 mmol/L or greater or a 1 hour glucose challenge test result of greater than 7.8 mmol/L (P=0.02). Conclusion A low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy did not reduce the incidence of large for gestational age infants in a group at risk of fetal macrosomia. It did, however, have a significant positive effect on gestational weight gain and maternal glucose intolerance. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN54392969. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3431285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34312852012-08-31 Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial Walsh, Jennifer M McGowan, Ciara A Mahony, Rhona Foley, Michael E McAuliffe, Fionnuala M BMJ Research Objective To determine if a low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy could reduce the incidence of macrosomia in an at risk group. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Participants 800 women without diabetes, all in their second pregnancy between January 2007 to January 2011, having previously delivered an infant weighing greater than 4 kg. Intervention Women were randomised to receive no dietary intervention or start on a low glycaemic index diet from early pregnancy. Main outcomes The primary outcome measure was difference in birth weight. The secondary outcome measure was difference in gestational weight gain. Results No significant difference was seen between the two groups in absolute birth weight, birthweight centile, or ponderal index. Significantly less gestational weight gain occurred in women in the intervention arm (12.2 v 13.7 kg; mean difference −1.3, 95% confidence interval −2.4 to −0.2; P=0.01). The rate of glucose intolerance was also lower in the intervention arm: 21% (67/320) compared with 28% (100/352) of controls had a fasting glucose of 5.1 mmol/L or greater or a 1 hour glucose challenge test result of greater than 7.8 mmol/L (P=0.02). Conclusion A low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy did not reduce the incidence of large for gestational age infants in a group at risk of fetal macrosomia. It did, however, have a significant positive effect on gestational weight gain and maternal glucose intolerance. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN54392969. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3431285/ /pubmed/22936795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5605 Text en © Walsh et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Research Walsh, Jennifer M McGowan, Ciara A Mahony, Rhona Foley, Michael E McAuliffe, Fionnuala M Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial |
title | Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial |
title_full | Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial |
title_fullStr | Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial |
title_short | Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial |
title_sort | low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (rolo study): randomised control trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22936795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walshjenniferm lowglycaemicindexdietinpregnancytopreventmacrosomiarolostudyrandomisedcontroltrial AT mcgowanciaraa lowglycaemicindexdietinpregnancytopreventmacrosomiarolostudyrandomisedcontroltrial AT mahonyrhona lowglycaemicindexdietinpregnancytopreventmacrosomiarolostudyrandomisedcontroltrial AT foleymichaele lowglycaemicindexdietinpregnancytopreventmacrosomiarolostudyrandomisedcontroltrial AT mcauliffefionnualam lowglycaemicindexdietinpregnancytopreventmacrosomiarolostudyrandomisedcontroltrial |