Cargando…

Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial

Objective To determine if a low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy could reduce the incidence of macrosomia in an at risk group. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Participants 800 women without diabetes, all in their second pregnancy between January 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walsh, Jennifer M, McGowan, Ciara A, Mahony, Rhona, Foley, Michael E, McAuliffe, Fionnuala M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22936795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5605
_version_ 1782242055963017216
author Walsh, Jennifer M
McGowan, Ciara A
Mahony, Rhona
Foley, Michael E
McAuliffe, Fionnuala M
author_facet Walsh, Jennifer M
McGowan, Ciara A
Mahony, Rhona
Foley, Michael E
McAuliffe, Fionnuala M
author_sort Walsh, Jennifer M
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine if a low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy could reduce the incidence of macrosomia in an at risk group. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Participants 800 women without diabetes, all in their second pregnancy between January 2007 to January 2011, having previously delivered an infant weighing greater than 4 kg. Intervention Women were randomised to receive no dietary intervention or start on a low glycaemic index diet from early pregnancy. Main outcomes The primary outcome measure was difference in birth weight. The secondary outcome measure was difference in gestational weight gain. Results No significant difference was seen between the two groups in absolute birth weight, birthweight centile, or ponderal index. Significantly less gestational weight gain occurred in women in the intervention arm (12.2 v 13.7 kg; mean difference −1.3, 95% confidence interval −2.4 to −0.2; P=0.01). The rate of glucose intolerance was also lower in the intervention arm: 21% (67/320) compared with 28% (100/352) of controls had a fasting glucose of 5.1 mmol/L or greater or a 1 hour glucose challenge test result of greater than 7.8 mmol/L (P=0.02). Conclusion A low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy did not reduce the incidence of large for gestational age infants in a group at risk of fetal macrosomia. It did, however, have a significant positive effect on gestational weight gain and maternal glucose intolerance. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN54392969.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3431285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34312852012-08-31 Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial Walsh, Jennifer M McGowan, Ciara A Mahony, Rhona Foley, Michael E McAuliffe, Fionnuala M BMJ Research Objective To determine if a low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy could reduce the incidence of macrosomia in an at risk group. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Participants 800 women without diabetes, all in their second pregnancy between January 2007 to January 2011, having previously delivered an infant weighing greater than 4 kg. Intervention Women were randomised to receive no dietary intervention or start on a low glycaemic index diet from early pregnancy. Main outcomes The primary outcome measure was difference in birth weight. The secondary outcome measure was difference in gestational weight gain. Results No significant difference was seen between the two groups in absolute birth weight, birthweight centile, or ponderal index. Significantly less gestational weight gain occurred in women in the intervention arm (12.2 v 13.7 kg; mean difference −1.3, 95% confidence interval −2.4 to −0.2; P=0.01). The rate of glucose intolerance was also lower in the intervention arm: 21% (67/320) compared with 28% (100/352) of controls had a fasting glucose of 5.1 mmol/L or greater or a 1 hour glucose challenge test result of greater than 7.8 mmol/L (P=0.02). Conclusion A low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy did not reduce the incidence of large for gestational age infants in a group at risk of fetal macrosomia. It did, however, have a significant positive effect on gestational weight gain and maternal glucose intolerance. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN54392969. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3431285/ /pubmed/22936795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5605 Text en © Walsh et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Walsh, Jennifer M
McGowan, Ciara A
Mahony, Rhona
Foley, Michael E
McAuliffe, Fionnuala M
Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial
title Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial
title_full Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial
title_fullStr Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial
title_full_unstemmed Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial
title_short Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial
title_sort low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (rolo study): randomised control trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22936795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5605
work_keys_str_mv AT walshjenniferm lowglycaemicindexdietinpregnancytopreventmacrosomiarolostudyrandomisedcontroltrial
AT mcgowanciaraa lowglycaemicindexdietinpregnancytopreventmacrosomiarolostudyrandomisedcontroltrial
AT mahonyrhona lowglycaemicindexdietinpregnancytopreventmacrosomiarolostudyrandomisedcontroltrial
AT foleymichaele lowglycaemicindexdietinpregnancytopreventmacrosomiarolostudyrandomisedcontroltrial
AT mcauliffefionnualam lowglycaemicindexdietinpregnancytopreventmacrosomiarolostudyrandomisedcontroltrial