Cargando…
Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) beyond double reading for pulmonary nodules on low-dose computed tomography (CT) by nodule volume. METHODS: A total of 400 low-dose chest CT examinations were randomly selected from the NELSON lung cancer screening trial. CTs were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22814824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2437-y |
_version_ | 1782242086782763008 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Yingru de Bock, Geertruida H. Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn van Klaveren, Rob J. Wang, Ying Bogoni, Luca de Jong, Pim A. Mali, Willem P. van Ooijen, Peter M. A. Oudkerk, Matthijs |
author_facet | Zhao, Yingru de Bock, Geertruida H. Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn van Klaveren, Rob J. Wang, Ying Bogoni, Luca de Jong, Pim A. Mali, Willem P. van Ooijen, Peter M. A. Oudkerk, Matthijs |
author_sort | Zhao, Yingru |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) beyond double reading for pulmonary nodules on low-dose computed tomography (CT) by nodule volume. METHODS: A total of 400 low-dose chest CT examinations were randomly selected from the NELSON lung cancer screening trial. CTs were evaluated by two independent readers and processed by CAD. A total of 1,667 findings marked by readers and/or CAD were evaluated by a consensus panel of expert chest radiologists. Performance was evaluated by calculating sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection and number of false positives, by nodule characteristics and volume. RESULTS: According to the screening protocol, 90.9 % of the findings could be excluded from further evaluation, 49.2 % being small nodules (less than 50 mm(3)). Excluding small nodules reduced false-positive detections by CAD from 3.7 to 1.9 per examination. Of 151 findings that needed further evaluation, 33 (21.9 %) were detected by CAD only, one of them being diagnosed as lung cancer the following year. The sensitivity of nodule detection was 78.1 % for double reading and 96.7 % for CAD. A total of 69.7 % of nodules undetected by readers were attached nodules of which 78.3 % were vessel-attached. CONCLUSIONS: CAD is valuable in lung cancer screening to improve sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection beyond double reading, at a low false-positive rate when excluding small nodules. KEY POINTS: • Computer-aided detection (CAD) has known advantages for computed tomography (CT). • Combined CAD/nodule size cut-off parameters assist CT lung cancer screening. • This combination improves the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection by CT. • It increases the positive predictive value for cancer detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3431468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34314682012-09-17 Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume Zhao, Yingru de Bock, Geertruida H. Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn van Klaveren, Rob J. Wang, Ying Bogoni, Luca de Jong, Pim A. Mali, Willem P. van Ooijen, Peter M. A. Oudkerk, Matthijs Eur Radiol Chest OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) beyond double reading for pulmonary nodules on low-dose computed tomography (CT) by nodule volume. METHODS: A total of 400 low-dose chest CT examinations were randomly selected from the NELSON lung cancer screening trial. CTs were evaluated by two independent readers and processed by CAD. A total of 1,667 findings marked by readers and/or CAD were evaluated by a consensus panel of expert chest radiologists. Performance was evaluated by calculating sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection and number of false positives, by nodule characteristics and volume. RESULTS: According to the screening protocol, 90.9 % of the findings could be excluded from further evaluation, 49.2 % being small nodules (less than 50 mm(3)). Excluding small nodules reduced false-positive detections by CAD from 3.7 to 1.9 per examination. Of 151 findings that needed further evaluation, 33 (21.9 %) were detected by CAD only, one of them being diagnosed as lung cancer the following year. The sensitivity of nodule detection was 78.1 % for double reading and 96.7 % for CAD. A total of 69.7 % of nodules undetected by readers were attached nodules of which 78.3 % were vessel-attached. CONCLUSIONS: CAD is valuable in lung cancer screening to improve sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection beyond double reading, at a low false-positive rate when excluding small nodules. KEY POINTS: • Computer-aided detection (CAD) has known advantages for computed tomography (CT). • Combined CAD/nodule size cut-off parameters assist CT lung cancer screening. • This combination improves the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection by CT. • It increases the positive predictive value for cancer detection. Springer-Verlag 2012-07-20 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3431468/ /pubmed/22814824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2437-y Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Chest Zhao, Yingru de Bock, Geertruida H. Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn van Klaveren, Rob J. Wang, Ying Bogoni, Luca de Jong, Pim A. Mali, Willem P. van Ooijen, Peter M. A. Oudkerk, Matthijs Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume |
title | Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume |
title_full | Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume |
title_fullStr | Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume |
title_short | Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume |
title_sort | performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose ct: comparison with double reading by nodule volume |
topic | Chest |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22814824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2437-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoyingru performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume AT debockgeertruidah performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume AT vliegenthartrozemarijn performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume AT vanklaverenrobj performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume AT wangying performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume AT bogoniluca performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume AT dejongpima performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume AT maliwillemp performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume AT vanooijenpeterma performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume AT oudkerkmatthijs performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume |