Cargando…

Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) beyond double reading for pulmonary nodules on low-dose computed tomography (CT) by nodule volume. METHODS: A total of 400 low-dose chest CT examinations were randomly selected from the NELSON lung cancer screening trial. CTs were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yingru, de Bock, Geertruida H., Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn, van Klaveren, Rob J., Wang, Ying, Bogoni, Luca, de Jong, Pim A., Mali, Willem P., van Ooijen, Peter M. A., Oudkerk, Matthijs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22814824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2437-y
_version_ 1782242086782763008
author Zhao, Yingru
de Bock, Geertruida H.
Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
van Klaveren, Rob J.
Wang, Ying
Bogoni, Luca
de Jong, Pim A.
Mali, Willem P.
van Ooijen, Peter M. A.
Oudkerk, Matthijs
author_facet Zhao, Yingru
de Bock, Geertruida H.
Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
van Klaveren, Rob J.
Wang, Ying
Bogoni, Luca
de Jong, Pim A.
Mali, Willem P.
van Ooijen, Peter M. A.
Oudkerk, Matthijs
author_sort Zhao, Yingru
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) beyond double reading for pulmonary nodules on low-dose computed tomography (CT) by nodule volume. METHODS: A total of 400 low-dose chest CT examinations were randomly selected from the NELSON lung cancer screening trial. CTs were evaluated by two independent readers and processed by CAD. A total of 1,667 findings marked by readers and/or CAD were evaluated by a consensus panel of expert chest radiologists. Performance was evaluated by calculating sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection and number of false positives, by nodule characteristics and volume. RESULTS: According to the screening protocol, 90.9 % of the findings could be excluded from further evaluation, 49.2 % being small nodules (less than 50 mm(3)). Excluding small nodules reduced false-positive detections by CAD from 3.7 to 1.9 per examination. Of 151 findings that needed further evaluation, 33 (21.9 %) were detected by CAD only, one of them being diagnosed as lung cancer the following year. The sensitivity of nodule detection was 78.1 % for double reading and 96.7 % for CAD. A total of 69.7 % of nodules undetected by readers were attached nodules of which 78.3 % were vessel-attached. CONCLUSIONS: CAD is valuable in lung cancer screening to improve sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection beyond double reading, at a low false-positive rate when excluding small nodules. KEY POINTS: • Computer-aided detection (CAD) has known advantages for computed tomography (CT). • Combined CAD/nodule size cut-off parameters assist CT lung cancer screening. • This combination improves the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection by CT. • It increases the positive predictive value for cancer detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3431468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34314682012-09-17 Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume Zhao, Yingru de Bock, Geertruida H. Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn van Klaveren, Rob J. Wang, Ying Bogoni, Luca de Jong, Pim A. Mali, Willem P. van Ooijen, Peter M. A. Oudkerk, Matthijs Eur Radiol Chest OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) beyond double reading for pulmonary nodules on low-dose computed tomography (CT) by nodule volume. METHODS: A total of 400 low-dose chest CT examinations were randomly selected from the NELSON lung cancer screening trial. CTs were evaluated by two independent readers and processed by CAD. A total of 1,667 findings marked by readers and/or CAD were evaluated by a consensus panel of expert chest radiologists. Performance was evaluated by calculating sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection and number of false positives, by nodule characteristics and volume. RESULTS: According to the screening protocol, 90.9 % of the findings could be excluded from further evaluation, 49.2 % being small nodules (less than 50 mm(3)). Excluding small nodules reduced false-positive detections by CAD from 3.7 to 1.9 per examination. Of 151 findings that needed further evaluation, 33 (21.9 %) were detected by CAD only, one of them being diagnosed as lung cancer the following year. The sensitivity of nodule detection was 78.1 % for double reading and 96.7 % for CAD. A total of 69.7 % of nodules undetected by readers were attached nodules of which 78.3 % were vessel-attached. CONCLUSIONS: CAD is valuable in lung cancer screening to improve sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection beyond double reading, at a low false-positive rate when excluding small nodules. KEY POINTS: • Computer-aided detection (CAD) has known advantages for computed tomography (CT). • Combined CAD/nodule size cut-off parameters assist CT lung cancer screening. • This combination improves the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection by CT. • It increases the positive predictive value for cancer detection. Springer-Verlag 2012-07-20 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3431468/ /pubmed/22814824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2437-y Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Chest
Zhao, Yingru
de Bock, Geertruida H.
Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
van Klaveren, Rob J.
Wang, Ying
Bogoni, Luca
de Jong, Pim A.
Mali, Willem P.
van Ooijen, Peter M. A.
Oudkerk, Matthijs
Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume
title Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume
title_full Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume
title_fullStr Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume
title_full_unstemmed Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume
title_short Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume
title_sort performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose ct: comparison with double reading by nodule volume
topic Chest
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22814824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2437-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyingru performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume
AT debockgeertruidah performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume
AT vliegenthartrozemarijn performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume
AT vanklaverenrobj performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume
AT wangying performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume
AT bogoniluca performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume
AT dejongpima performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume
AT maliwillemp performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume
AT vanooijenpeterma performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume
AT oudkerkmatthijs performanceofcomputeraideddetectionofpulmonarynodulesinlowdosectcomparisonwithdoublereadingbynodulevolume