Cargando…
Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial
A nicotine mouth spray has advantages over other acute forms of nicotine replacement therapy, such as a faster uptake of nicotine and faster relief of craving. This multicentre, randomised (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study evaluated self-reported, carbon monoxide-veri...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3432241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00155811 |
_version_ | 1782242188144410624 |
---|---|
author | Tønnesen, Philip Lauri, Hans Perfekt, Roland Mann, Karl Batra, Anil |
author_facet | Tønnesen, Philip Lauri, Hans Perfekt, Roland Mann, Karl Batra, Anil |
author_sort | Tønnesen, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | A nicotine mouth spray has advantages over other acute forms of nicotine replacement therapy, such as a faster uptake of nicotine and faster relief of craving. This multicentre, randomised (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study evaluated self-reported, carbon monoxide-verified continuous abstinence from smoking from week 2 until weeks 6, 24, and 52 in 479 smokers (≥1 cigarette per day) who were treated with either active (n=318) or placebo (n=161) spray for 12 weeks and low-intensity counselling at three smoking cessation clinics in Denmark and Germany. Active treatment yielded significantly higher continuous abstinence rates than placebo from week 2 until week 6 (26.1% versus 16.1%; relative success rate (RR) 1.62, 95% CI 1.09–2.41), week 24 (15.7% versus 6.8%; RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.23–4.30), and week 52 (13.8% versus 5.6%; RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.24–4.94). Most adverse events were mild to moderate, and 9.1% of subjects on active spray withdrew due to adverse events, compared to 7.5% on placebo. The overall rate of treatment-related adverse events was 87.4% with active spray versus 71.4% with placebo spray. Nicotine mouth spray delivered significantly higher 6-, 24- and 52-week continuous abstinence rates than placebo. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3432241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34322412012-09-04 Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial Tønnesen, Philip Lauri, Hans Perfekt, Roland Mann, Karl Batra, Anil Eur Respir J Original Article A nicotine mouth spray has advantages over other acute forms of nicotine replacement therapy, such as a faster uptake of nicotine and faster relief of craving. This multicentre, randomised (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study evaluated self-reported, carbon monoxide-verified continuous abstinence from smoking from week 2 until weeks 6, 24, and 52 in 479 smokers (≥1 cigarette per day) who were treated with either active (n=318) or placebo (n=161) spray for 12 weeks and low-intensity counselling at three smoking cessation clinics in Denmark and Germany. Active treatment yielded significantly higher continuous abstinence rates than placebo from week 2 until week 6 (26.1% versus 16.1%; relative success rate (RR) 1.62, 95% CI 1.09–2.41), week 24 (15.7% versus 6.8%; RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.23–4.30), and week 52 (13.8% versus 5.6%; RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.24–4.94). Most adverse events were mild to moderate, and 9.1% of subjects on active spray withdrew due to adverse events, compared to 7.5% on placebo. The overall rate of treatment-related adverse events was 87.4% with active spray versus 71.4% with placebo spray. Nicotine mouth spray delivered significantly higher 6-, 24- and 52-week continuous abstinence rates than placebo. European Respiratory Society 2012-09 2012-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3432241/ /pubmed/22323576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00155811 Text en ©ERS 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ ERJ Open articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the (Creative Commons Attribution Licence 3.0> (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tønnesen, Philip Lauri, Hans Perfekt, Roland Mann, Karl Batra, Anil Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial |
title | Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial |
title_full | Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial |
title_short | Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial |
title_sort | efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3432241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00155811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tønnesenphilip efficacyofanicotinemouthsprayinsmokingcessationarandomiseddoubleblindtrial AT laurihans efficacyofanicotinemouthsprayinsmokingcessationarandomiseddoubleblindtrial AT perfektroland efficacyofanicotinemouthsprayinsmokingcessationarandomiseddoubleblindtrial AT mannkarl efficacyofanicotinemouthsprayinsmokingcessationarandomiseddoubleblindtrial AT batraanil efficacyofanicotinemouthsprayinsmokingcessationarandomiseddoubleblindtrial |