Cargando…

Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial

A nicotine mouth spray has advantages over other acute forms of nicotine replacement therapy, such as a faster uptake of nicotine and faster relief of craving. This multicentre, randomised (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study evaluated self-reported, carbon monoxide-veri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tønnesen, Philip, Lauri, Hans, Perfekt, Roland, Mann, Karl, Batra, Anil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3432241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00155811
_version_ 1782242188144410624
author Tønnesen, Philip
Lauri, Hans
Perfekt, Roland
Mann, Karl
Batra, Anil
author_facet Tønnesen, Philip
Lauri, Hans
Perfekt, Roland
Mann, Karl
Batra, Anil
author_sort Tønnesen, Philip
collection PubMed
description A nicotine mouth spray has advantages over other acute forms of nicotine replacement therapy, such as a faster uptake of nicotine and faster relief of craving. This multicentre, randomised (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study evaluated self-reported, carbon monoxide-verified continuous abstinence from smoking from week 2 until weeks 6, 24, and 52 in 479 smokers (≥1 cigarette per day) who were treated with either active (n=318) or placebo (n=161) spray for 12 weeks and low-intensity counselling at three smoking cessation clinics in Denmark and Germany. Active treatment yielded significantly higher continuous abstinence rates than placebo from week 2 until week 6 (26.1% versus 16.1%; relative success rate (RR) 1.62, 95% CI 1.09–2.41), week 24 (15.7% versus 6.8%; RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.23–4.30), and week 52 (13.8% versus 5.6%; RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.24–4.94). Most adverse events were mild to moderate, and 9.1% of subjects on active spray withdrew due to adverse events, compared to 7.5% on placebo. The overall rate of treatment-related adverse events was 87.4% with active spray versus 71.4% with placebo spray. Nicotine mouth spray delivered significantly higher 6-, 24- and 52-week continuous abstinence rates than placebo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3432241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34322412012-09-04 Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial Tønnesen, Philip Lauri, Hans Perfekt, Roland Mann, Karl Batra, Anil Eur Respir J Original Article A nicotine mouth spray has advantages over other acute forms of nicotine replacement therapy, such as a faster uptake of nicotine and faster relief of craving. This multicentre, randomised (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study evaluated self-reported, carbon monoxide-verified continuous abstinence from smoking from week 2 until weeks 6, 24, and 52 in 479 smokers (≥1 cigarette per day) who were treated with either active (n=318) or placebo (n=161) spray for 12 weeks and low-intensity counselling at three smoking cessation clinics in Denmark and Germany. Active treatment yielded significantly higher continuous abstinence rates than placebo from week 2 until week 6 (26.1% versus 16.1%; relative success rate (RR) 1.62, 95% CI 1.09–2.41), week 24 (15.7% versus 6.8%; RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.23–4.30), and week 52 (13.8% versus 5.6%; RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.24–4.94). Most adverse events were mild to moderate, and 9.1% of subjects on active spray withdrew due to adverse events, compared to 7.5% on placebo. The overall rate of treatment-related adverse events was 87.4% with active spray versus 71.4% with placebo spray. Nicotine mouth spray delivered significantly higher 6-, 24- and 52-week continuous abstinence rates than placebo. European Respiratory Society 2012-09 2012-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3432241/ /pubmed/22323576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00155811 Text en ©ERS 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ ERJ Open articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the (Creative Commons Attribution Licence 3.0> (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Article
Tønnesen, Philip
Lauri, Hans
Perfekt, Roland
Mann, Karl
Batra, Anil
Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial
title Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial
title_full Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial
title_short Efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial
title_sort efficacy of a nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3432241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00155811
work_keys_str_mv AT tønnesenphilip efficacyofanicotinemouthsprayinsmokingcessationarandomiseddoubleblindtrial
AT laurihans efficacyofanicotinemouthsprayinsmokingcessationarandomiseddoubleblindtrial
AT perfektroland efficacyofanicotinemouthsprayinsmokingcessationarandomiseddoubleblindtrial
AT mannkarl efficacyofanicotinemouthsprayinsmokingcessationarandomiseddoubleblindtrial
AT batraanil efficacyofanicotinemouthsprayinsmokingcessationarandomiseddoubleblindtrial