Cargando…

Comparison of Central Macular Thickness Measured by Three OCT Models and Study of Interoperator Variability

Purpose. To compare central macular thickness (CMT) measurement on healthy patient using 3 different OCT devices by two operators. Methods. Prospective, monocentricstudy. Right eye's central macular thickness (CMT) of 30 healthy patients has been measured three times using a time-domain (TD) OC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bentaleb-Machkour, Zaïnab, Jouffroy, Eléonore, Rabilloud, Muriel, Grange, Jean-Daniel, Kodjikian, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3432357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22973177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/842795
_version_ 1782242197857370112
author Bentaleb-Machkour, Zaïnab
Jouffroy, Eléonore
Rabilloud, Muriel
Grange, Jean-Daniel
Kodjikian, Laurent
author_facet Bentaleb-Machkour, Zaïnab
Jouffroy, Eléonore
Rabilloud, Muriel
Grange, Jean-Daniel
Kodjikian, Laurent
author_sort Bentaleb-Machkour, Zaïnab
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To compare central macular thickness (CMT) measurement on healthy patient using 3 different OCT devices by two operators. Methods. Prospective, monocentricstudy. Right eye's central macular thickness (CMT) of 30 healthy patients has been measured three times using a time-domain (TD) OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, Ca) and two spectral domain (SD) OCTs (Cirrus HD-OCT, Carl ZeissMeditec, Dublin, Ca) and 3D-OCT 1000 (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) by two operators. Six measurements were taken randomly for each patient the same day. Results. No significant difference between measurements obtained by the two operators has been observed, whatever the studied OCT. P value was 0.164, 0.193, and 0.147 for Stratus OCT, Cirrus HD-OCT and 3D-OCT, respectively. Mean CMT significantly differed from instrument to instrument (P < 0.001) and was, respectively, 197 μm, 254 μm, and 236 μm using Stratus OCT, Cirrus HD-OCT, and 3D-OCT 1000. Using Cirrus OCT and 3D-OCT 1000, CMT was, respectively, 57 μm and 39 μm thicker than using Stratus OCT (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Whatever the OCT device, on healthy patients CMT was not operator dependent. CMT measurements obtained by SD-OCTs are greater than those obtained by TD-OCT. These data imply that the different OCT devices cannot be used interchangeably in clinical monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3432357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34323572012-09-12 Comparison of Central Macular Thickness Measured by Three OCT Models and Study of Interoperator Variability Bentaleb-Machkour, Zaïnab Jouffroy, Eléonore Rabilloud, Muriel Grange, Jean-Daniel Kodjikian, Laurent ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Purpose. To compare central macular thickness (CMT) measurement on healthy patient using 3 different OCT devices by two operators. Methods. Prospective, monocentricstudy. Right eye's central macular thickness (CMT) of 30 healthy patients has been measured three times using a time-domain (TD) OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, Ca) and two spectral domain (SD) OCTs (Cirrus HD-OCT, Carl ZeissMeditec, Dublin, Ca) and 3D-OCT 1000 (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) by two operators. Six measurements were taken randomly for each patient the same day. Results. No significant difference between measurements obtained by the two operators has been observed, whatever the studied OCT. P value was 0.164, 0.193, and 0.147 for Stratus OCT, Cirrus HD-OCT and 3D-OCT, respectively. Mean CMT significantly differed from instrument to instrument (P < 0.001) and was, respectively, 197 μm, 254 μm, and 236 μm using Stratus OCT, Cirrus HD-OCT, and 3D-OCT 1000. Using Cirrus OCT and 3D-OCT 1000, CMT was, respectively, 57 μm and 39 μm thicker than using Stratus OCT (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Whatever the OCT device, on healthy patients CMT was not operator dependent. CMT measurements obtained by SD-OCTs are greater than those obtained by TD-OCT. These data imply that the different OCT devices cannot be used interchangeably in clinical monitoring. The Scientific World Journal 2012-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3432357/ /pubmed/22973177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/842795 Text en Copyright © 2012 Zaïnab Bentaleb-Machkour et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bentaleb-Machkour, Zaïnab
Jouffroy, Eléonore
Rabilloud, Muriel
Grange, Jean-Daniel
Kodjikian, Laurent
Comparison of Central Macular Thickness Measured by Three OCT Models and Study of Interoperator Variability
title Comparison of Central Macular Thickness Measured by Three OCT Models and Study of Interoperator Variability
title_full Comparison of Central Macular Thickness Measured by Three OCT Models and Study of Interoperator Variability
title_fullStr Comparison of Central Macular Thickness Measured by Three OCT Models and Study of Interoperator Variability
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Central Macular Thickness Measured by Three OCT Models and Study of Interoperator Variability
title_short Comparison of Central Macular Thickness Measured by Three OCT Models and Study of Interoperator Variability
title_sort comparison of central macular thickness measured by three oct models and study of interoperator variability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3432357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22973177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/842795
work_keys_str_mv AT bentalebmachkourzainab comparisonofcentralmacularthicknessmeasuredbythreeoctmodelsandstudyofinteroperatorvariability
AT jouffroyeleonore comparisonofcentralmacularthicknessmeasuredbythreeoctmodelsandstudyofinteroperatorvariability
AT rabilloudmuriel comparisonofcentralmacularthicknessmeasuredbythreeoctmodelsandstudyofinteroperatorvariability
AT grangejeandaniel comparisonofcentralmacularthicknessmeasuredbythreeoctmodelsandstudyofinteroperatorvariability
AT kodjikianlaurent comparisonofcentralmacularthicknessmeasuredbythreeoctmodelsandstudyofinteroperatorvariability