Cargando…

Registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-life care—a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: Structured methods to assess and support improvement in the quality of end-of-life care are lacking and need to be developed. This need is particularly high outside the specialised palliative care. This study examines whether participation in a national quality register increased the qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinsson, Lisa, Fürst, Carl Johan, Lundström, Staffan, Nathanaelsson, Lena, Axelsson, Bertil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3432841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22936818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001328
_version_ 1782242254765686784
author Martinsson, Lisa
Fürst, Carl Johan
Lundström, Staffan
Nathanaelsson, Lena
Axelsson, Bertil
author_facet Martinsson, Lisa
Fürst, Carl Johan
Lundström, Staffan
Nathanaelsson, Lena
Axelsson, Bertil
author_sort Martinsson, Lisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Structured methods to assess and support improvement in the quality of end-of-life care are lacking and need to be developed. This need is particularly high outside the specialised palliative care. This study examines whether participation in a national quality register increased the quality of end-of-life care. DESIGN: This study is a cross-sectional longitudinal register study. SETTING: The Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) collects data about end-of-life care for deaths in all types of healthcare units all over Sweden. Data from all 503 healthcare units that had reported patients continuously to the register during a 3-year period were analysed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on provided care during the last weeks of life were compared year-by-year with logistic regression. PARTICIPANTS: The study included a total 30 283 patients. The gender distribution was 54% women and 46% men. A total of 60% of patients in the study had a cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Provided end-of-life care improved in a number of ways. The prevalence of six examined symptoms decreased. The prescription of ‘as needed’ medications for pain, nausea, anxiety and death rattle increased. A higher proportion of patients died in their place of preference. The patient's next of kin was more often offered a follow-up appointment after the patient's death. No changes were seen with respect to providing information to the patient or next of kin. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a national quality register covariates with quality improvements in end-of-life care over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3432841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34328412012-09-11 Registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-life care—a cross-sectional study Martinsson, Lisa Fürst, Carl Johan Lundström, Staffan Nathanaelsson, Lena Axelsson, Bertil BMJ Open Palliative Care OBJECTIVES: Structured methods to assess and support improvement in the quality of end-of-life care are lacking and need to be developed. This need is particularly high outside the specialised palliative care. This study examines whether participation in a national quality register increased the quality of end-of-life care. DESIGN: This study is a cross-sectional longitudinal register study. SETTING: The Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) collects data about end-of-life care for deaths in all types of healthcare units all over Sweden. Data from all 503 healthcare units that had reported patients continuously to the register during a 3-year period were analysed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on provided care during the last weeks of life were compared year-by-year with logistic regression. PARTICIPANTS: The study included a total 30 283 patients. The gender distribution was 54% women and 46% men. A total of 60% of patients in the study had a cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Provided end-of-life care improved in a number of ways. The prevalence of six examined symptoms decreased. The prescription of ‘as needed’ medications for pain, nausea, anxiety and death rattle increased. A higher proportion of patients died in their place of preference. The patient's next of kin was more often offered a follow-up appointment after the patient's death. No changes were seen with respect to providing information to the patient or next of kin. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a national quality register covariates with quality improvements in end-of-life care over time. BMJ Group 2012 2012-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3432841/ /pubmed/22936818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001328 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Martinsson, Lisa
Fürst, Carl Johan
Lundström, Staffan
Nathanaelsson, Lena
Axelsson, Bertil
Registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-life care—a cross-sectional study
title Registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-life care—a cross-sectional study
title_full Registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-life care—a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-life care—a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-life care—a cross-sectional study
title_short Registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-life care—a cross-sectional study
title_sort registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-life care—a cross-sectional study
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3432841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22936818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001328
work_keys_str_mv AT martinssonlisa registrationinaqualityregisteramethodtoimproveendoflifecareacrosssectionalstudy
AT furstcarljohan registrationinaqualityregisteramethodtoimproveendoflifecareacrosssectionalstudy
AT lundstromstaffan registrationinaqualityregisteramethodtoimproveendoflifecareacrosssectionalstudy
AT nathanaelssonlena registrationinaqualityregisteramethodtoimproveendoflifecareacrosssectionalstudy
AT axelssonbertil registrationinaqualityregisteramethodtoimproveendoflifecareacrosssectionalstudy