Cargando…

Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition

There is now compelling evidence that motor imagery (MI) and actual movement share common neural substrate. However, the question of how MI inhibits the transmission of motor commands into the efferent pathways in order to prevent any movement is largely unresolved. Similarly, little is known about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guillot, Aymeric, Di Rienzo, Franck, MacIntyre, Tadhg, Moran, Aidan, Collet, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3433680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22973214
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00247
_version_ 1782242344980971520
author Guillot, Aymeric
Di Rienzo, Franck
MacIntyre, Tadhg
Moran, Aidan
Collet, Christian
author_facet Guillot, Aymeric
Di Rienzo, Franck
MacIntyre, Tadhg
Moran, Aidan
Collet, Christian
author_sort Guillot, Aymeric
collection PubMed
description There is now compelling evidence that motor imagery (MI) and actual movement share common neural substrate. However, the question of how MI inhibits the transmission of motor commands into the efferent pathways in order to prevent any movement is largely unresolved. Similarly, little is known about the nature of the electromyographic activity that is apparent during MI. In addressing these gaps in the literature, the present paper argues that MI includes motor execution commands for muscle contractions which are blocked at some level of the motor system by inhibitory mechanisms. We first assemble data from neuroimaging studies that demonstrate that the neural networks mediating MI and motor performance are not totally overlapping, thereby highlighting potential differences between MI and actual motor execution. We then review MI data indicating the presence of subliminal muscular activity reflecting the intrinsic characteristics of the motor command as well as increased corticomotor excitability. The third section not only considers the inhibitory mechanisms involved during MI but also examines how the brain resolves the problem of issuing the motor command for action while supervising motor inhibition when people engage in voluntary movement during MI. The last part of the paper draws on imagery research in clinical contexts to suggest that some patients move while imagining an action, although they are not aware of such movements. In particular, experimental data from amputees as well as from patients with Parkinson’s disease are discussed. We also review recent studies based on comparing brain activity in tetraplegic patients with that from healthy matched controls that provide insights into inhibitory processes during MI. We conclude by arguing that based on available evidence, a multifactorial explanation of motor inhibition during MI is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3433680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34336802012-09-12 Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition Guillot, Aymeric Di Rienzo, Franck MacIntyre, Tadhg Moran, Aidan Collet, Christian Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience There is now compelling evidence that motor imagery (MI) and actual movement share common neural substrate. However, the question of how MI inhibits the transmission of motor commands into the efferent pathways in order to prevent any movement is largely unresolved. Similarly, little is known about the nature of the electromyographic activity that is apparent during MI. In addressing these gaps in the literature, the present paper argues that MI includes motor execution commands for muscle contractions which are blocked at some level of the motor system by inhibitory mechanisms. We first assemble data from neuroimaging studies that demonstrate that the neural networks mediating MI and motor performance are not totally overlapping, thereby highlighting potential differences between MI and actual motor execution. We then review MI data indicating the presence of subliminal muscular activity reflecting the intrinsic characteristics of the motor command as well as increased corticomotor excitability. The third section not only considers the inhibitory mechanisms involved during MI but also examines how the brain resolves the problem of issuing the motor command for action while supervising motor inhibition when people engage in voluntary movement during MI. The last part of the paper draws on imagery research in clinical contexts to suggest that some patients move while imagining an action, although they are not aware of such movements. In particular, experimental data from amputees as well as from patients with Parkinson’s disease are discussed. We also review recent studies based on comparing brain activity in tetraplegic patients with that from healthy matched controls that provide insights into inhibitory processes during MI. We conclude by arguing that based on available evidence, a multifactorial explanation of motor inhibition during MI is warranted. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3433680/ /pubmed/22973214 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00247 Text en Copyright © 2012 Guillot, Di Rienzo, MacIntyre, Moran and Collet. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Guillot, Aymeric
Di Rienzo, Franck
MacIntyre, Tadhg
Moran, Aidan
Collet, Christian
Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition
title Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition
title_full Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition
title_fullStr Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition
title_short Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition
title_sort imagining is not doing but involves specific motor commands: a review of experimental data related to motor inhibition
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3433680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22973214
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00247
work_keys_str_mv AT guillotaymeric imaginingisnotdoingbutinvolvesspecificmotorcommandsareviewofexperimentaldatarelatedtomotorinhibition
AT dirienzofranck imaginingisnotdoingbutinvolvesspecificmotorcommandsareviewofexperimentaldatarelatedtomotorinhibition
AT macintyretadhg imaginingisnotdoingbutinvolvesspecificmotorcommandsareviewofexperimentaldatarelatedtomotorinhibition
AT moranaidan imaginingisnotdoingbutinvolvesspecificmotorcommandsareviewofexperimentaldatarelatedtomotorinhibition
AT colletchristian imaginingisnotdoingbutinvolvesspecificmotorcommandsareviewofexperimentaldatarelatedtomotorinhibition