Cargando…
A complex speciation–richness relationship in a simple neutral model
Speciation is the “elephant in the room” of community ecology. As the ultimate source of biodiversity, its integration in ecology's theoretical corpus is necessary to understand community assembly. Yet, speciation is often completely ignored or stripped of its spatial dimension. Recent approach...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3433983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22957181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.292 |
_version_ | 1782242365401989120 |
---|---|
author | Desjardins-Proulx, Philippe Gravel, Dominique |
author_facet | Desjardins-Proulx, Philippe Gravel, Dominique |
author_sort | Desjardins-Proulx, Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Speciation is the “elephant in the room” of community ecology. As the ultimate source of biodiversity, its integration in ecology's theoretical corpus is necessary to understand community assembly. Yet, speciation is often completely ignored or stripped of its spatial dimension. Recent approaches based on network theory have allowed ecologists to effectively model complex landscapes. In this study, we use this framework to model allopatric and parapatric speciation in networks of communities. We focus on the relationship between speciation, richness, and the spatial structure of communities. We find a strong opposition between speciation and local richness, with speciation being more common in isolated communities and local richness being higher in more connected communities. Unlike previous models, we also find a transition to a positive relationship between speciation and local richness when dispersal is low and the number of communities is small. We use several measures of centrality to characterize the effect of network structure on diversity. The degree, the simplest measure of centrality, is the best predictor of local richness and speciation, although it loses some of its predictive power as connectivity grows. Our framework shows how a simple neutral model can be combined with network theory to reveal complex relationships between speciation, richness, and the spatial organization of populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3433983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34339832012-09-06 A complex speciation–richness relationship in a simple neutral model Desjardins-Proulx, Philippe Gravel, Dominique Ecol Evol Original Research Speciation is the “elephant in the room” of community ecology. As the ultimate source of biodiversity, its integration in ecology's theoretical corpus is necessary to understand community assembly. Yet, speciation is often completely ignored or stripped of its spatial dimension. Recent approaches based on network theory have allowed ecologists to effectively model complex landscapes. In this study, we use this framework to model allopatric and parapatric speciation in networks of communities. We focus on the relationship between speciation, richness, and the spatial structure of communities. We find a strong opposition between speciation and local richness, with speciation being more common in isolated communities and local richness being higher in more connected communities. Unlike previous models, we also find a transition to a positive relationship between speciation and local richness when dispersal is low and the number of communities is small. We use several measures of centrality to characterize the effect of network structure on diversity. The degree, the simplest measure of centrality, is the best predictor of local richness and speciation, although it loses some of its predictive power as connectivity grows. Our framework shows how a simple neutral model can be combined with network theory to reveal complex relationships between speciation, richness, and the spatial organization of populations. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-08 2012-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3433983/ /pubmed/22957181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.292 Text en © 2012 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Desjardins-Proulx, Philippe Gravel, Dominique A complex speciation–richness relationship in a simple neutral model |
title | A complex speciation–richness relationship in a simple neutral model |
title_full | A complex speciation–richness relationship in a simple neutral model |
title_fullStr | A complex speciation–richness relationship in a simple neutral model |
title_full_unstemmed | A complex speciation–richness relationship in a simple neutral model |
title_short | A complex speciation–richness relationship in a simple neutral model |
title_sort | complex speciation–richness relationship in a simple neutral model |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3433983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22957181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.292 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desjardinsproulxphilippe acomplexspeciationrichnessrelationshipinasimpleneutralmodel AT graveldominique acomplexspeciationrichnessrelationshipinasimpleneutralmodel AT desjardinsproulxphilippe complexspeciationrichnessrelationshipinasimpleneutralmodel AT graveldominique complexspeciationrichnessrelationshipinasimpleneutralmodel |