Cargando…
Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results
BACKGROUND: The assessment of functioning and disability is an important part of the clinical evaluation, since it measures disease burden and reflects the effectiveness of therapeutic planning and interventions. The aim of the current study was to develop such a self-report instrument on the basis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3434028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22594786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-11-14 |
_version_ | 1782242375904526336 |
---|---|
author | Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N Lekka, Eirini Kouidi, Evangelia Chouvarda, Ioanna Deligiannis, Asterios Maglaveras, Nickolaos |
author_facet | Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N Lekka, Eirini Kouidi, Evangelia Chouvarda, Ioanna Deligiannis, Asterios Maglaveras, Nickolaos |
author_sort | Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The assessment of functioning and disability is an important part of the clinical evaluation, since it measures disease burden and reflects the effectiveness of therapeutic planning and interventions. The aim of the current study was to develop such a self-report instrument on the basis of a review of the literature, and compatible with the WHO approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The review of the literature led to the development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S) with 25 items assessing different aspects of disability. The study sample included 728 persons from vulnerable populations (homeless, jobless, very low income, single parent families etc.; (29.12% males and 70.88% females; aged 55.96 ± 15.22 years). The protocol included also the STAI and the CES-D. The statistical analysis included factor analysis item analysis and ANCOVA. RESULTS: The factor analysis revealed the presence of 4 factors explaining 71% of total variance (Everyday functioning, Social and interpersonal functioning, Severity and Mental disability). Chronbach’s alpha for the whole scale was 0.95 and for subscales were 0.74–0.94. DISCUSSION: The results of the current study suggest that the Glo.Di.S. has the potential to serve as a reliable and valid tool for assessing functioning and disability. Further research is needed to prove that it could be useful across countries, populations and diseases, and whether it provides data that are culturally meaningful and comparable. It can be used in surveys and in clinical research settings and it can generate information of use in evaluating health needs and the effectiveness of interventions to reduce disability and improve health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3434028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34340282012-09-06 Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N Lekka, Eirini Kouidi, Evangelia Chouvarda, Ioanna Deligiannis, Asterios Maglaveras, Nickolaos Ann Gen Psychiatry Primary Research BACKGROUND: The assessment of functioning and disability is an important part of the clinical evaluation, since it measures disease burden and reflects the effectiveness of therapeutic planning and interventions. The aim of the current study was to develop such a self-report instrument on the basis of a review of the literature, and compatible with the WHO approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The review of the literature led to the development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S) with 25 items assessing different aspects of disability. The study sample included 728 persons from vulnerable populations (homeless, jobless, very low income, single parent families etc.; (29.12% males and 70.88% females; aged 55.96 ± 15.22 years). The protocol included also the STAI and the CES-D. The statistical analysis included factor analysis item analysis and ANCOVA. RESULTS: The factor analysis revealed the presence of 4 factors explaining 71% of total variance (Everyday functioning, Social and interpersonal functioning, Severity and Mental disability). Chronbach’s alpha for the whole scale was 0.95 and for subscales were 0.74–0.94. DISCUSSION: The results of the current study suggest that the Glo.Di.S. has the potential to serve as a reliable and valid tool for assessing functioning and disability. Further research is needed to prove that it could be useful across countries, populations and diseases, and whether it provides data that are culturally meaningful and comparable. It can be used in surveys and in clinical research settings and it can generate information of use in evaluating health needs and the effectiveness of interventions to reduce disability and improve health. BioMed Central 2012-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3434028/ /pubmed/22594786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-11-14 Text en Copyright ©2012 Fountoulakis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Primary Research Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N Lekka, Eirini Kouidi, Evangelia Chouvarda, Ioanna Deligiannis, Asterios Maglaveras, Nickolaos Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results |
title | Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results |
title_full | Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results |
title_fullStr | Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results |
title_short | Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results |
title_sort | development of the global disability scale (glo.di.s): preliminary results |
topic | Primary Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3434028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22594786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-11-14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fountoulakiskonstantinosn developmentoftheglobaldisabilityscaleglodispreliminaryresults AT lekkaeirini developmentoftheglobaldisabilityscaleglodispreliminaryresults AT kouidievangelia developmentoftheglobaldisabilityscaleglodispreliminaryresults AT chouvardaioanna developmentoftheglobaldisabilityscaleglodispreliminaryresults AT deligiannisasterios developmentoftheglobaldisabilityscaleglodispreliminaryresults AT maglaverasnickolaos developmentoftheglobaldisabilityscaleglodispreliminaryresults |