Cargando…
Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study
BACKGROUND: ERCP practically requires moderate to deep sedation controlled by a combination of benzodiazepine and opiod. Propofol as a sole agent may cause oversedation. A combination (cocktail) of infused propofol, meperidine, and midazolam can reduce the dosage of propofol and we hypothesized that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3434082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-12-20 |
_version_ | 1782242388464369664 |
---|---|
author | Angsuwatcharakon, Phonthep Rerknimitr, Rungsun Ridtitid, Wiriyaporn Kongkam, Pradermchai Poonyathawon, Sahadol Ponauthai, Yuwadee Sumdin, Sakolkan Kullavanijaya, Pinit |
author_facet | Angsuwatcharakon, Phonthep Rerknimitr, Rungsun Ridtitid, Wiriyaporn Kongkam, Pradermchai Poonyathawon, Sahadol Ponauthai, Yuwadee Sumdin, Sakolkan Kullavanijaya, Pinit |
author_sort | Angsuwatcharakon, Phonthep |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: ERCP practically requires moderate to deep sedation controlled by a combination of benzodiazepine and opiod. Propofol as a sole agent may cause oversedation. A combination (cocktail) of infused propofol, meperidine, and midazolam can reduce the dosage of propofol and we hypothesized that it might decrease the risk of oversedation. We prospectively compare the efficacy, recovery time, patient satisfactory, and side effects between cocktail and conventional sedations in patients undergoing ERCP. METHODS: ERCP patients were randomized into 2 groups; the cocktail group (n = 103) and the controls (n = 102). For induction, a combination of 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered in both groups. In the cocktail group, a bolus dose of propofol 1 mg/kg was administered and continuously infused. In the controls, 25 mg of meperidine or 2.5 mg/kg of midazolam were titrated to maintain the level of sedation. RESULTS: In the cocktail group, the average administration rate of propofol was 6.2 mg/kg/hr. In the control group; average weight base dosage of meperidine and midazolam were 1.03 mg/kg and 0.12 mg/kg, respectively. Recovery times and patients’ satisfaction scores in the cocktail and control groups were 9.67 minutes and 12.89 minutes (P = 0.045), 93.1and 87.6 (P <0.001), respectively. Desaturation rates in the cocktail and conventional groups were 58.3% and 31.4% (P <0.001), respectively. All desaturations were corrected with temporary oxygen supplementation without the need for scope removal. CONCLUSIONS: Cocktail sedation containing propofol provides faster recovery time and better patients’ satisfaction for patients undergoing ERCP. However, mild degree of desaturation may still develop. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01540084 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3434082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34340822012-09-06 Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study Angsuwatcharakon, Phonthep Rerknimitr, Rungsun Ridtitid, Wiriyaporn Kongkam, Pradermchai Poonyathawon, Sahadol Ponauthai, Yuwadee Sumdin, Sakolkan Kullavanijaya, Pinit BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: ERCP practically requires moderate to deep sedation controlled by a combination of benzodiazepine and opiod. Propofol as a sole agent may cause oversedation. A combination (cocktail) of infused propofol, meperidine, and midazolam can reduce the dosage of propofol and we hypothesized that it might decrease the risk of oversedation. We prospectively compare the efficacy, recovery time, patient satisfactory, and side effects between cocktail and conventional sedations in patients undergoing ERCP. METHODS: ERCP patients were randomized into 2 groups; the cocktail group (n = 103) and the controls (n = 102). For induction, a combination of 25 mg of meperidine and 2.5 mg of midazolam were administered in both groups. In the cocktail group, a bolus dose of propofol 1 mg/kg was administered and continuously infused. In the controls, 25 mg of meperidine or 2.5 mg/kg of midazolam were titrated to maintain the level of sedation. RESULTS: In the cocktail group, the average administration rate of propofol was 6.2 mg/kg/hr. In the control group; average weight base dosage of meperidine and midazolam were 1.03 mg/kg and 0.12 mg/kg, respectively. Recovery times and patients’ satisfaction scores in the cocktail and control groups were 9.67 minutes and 12.89 minutes (P = 0.045), 93.1and 87.6 (P <0.001), respectively. Desaturation rates in the cocktail and conventional groups were 58.3% and 31.4% (P <0.001), respectively. All desaturations were corrected with temporary oxygen supplementation without the need for scope removal. CONCLUSIONS: Cocktail sedation containing propofol provides faster recovery time and better patients’ satisfaction for patients undergoing ERCP. However, mild degree of desaturation may still develop. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01540084 BioMed Central 2012-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3434082/ /pubmed/22873637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-12-20 Text en Copyright ©2012 Angsuwatcharakon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Angsuwatcharakon, Phonthep Rerknimitr, Rungsun Ridtitid, Wiriyaporn Kongkam, Pradermchai Poonyathawon, Sahadol Ponauthai, Yuwadee Sumdin, Sakolkan Kullavanijaya, Pinit Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study |
title | Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study |
title_full | Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study |
title_short | Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study |
title_sort | cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ercp: a prospective, randomized controlled study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3434082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-12-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angsuwatcharakonphonthep cocktailsedationcontainingpropofolversusconventionalsedationforercpaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT rerknimitrrungsun cocktailsedationcontainingpropofolversusconventionalsedationforercpaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT ridtitidwiriyaporn cocktailsedationcontainingpropofolversusconventionalsedationforercpaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kongkampradermchai cocktailsedationcontainingpropofolversusconventionalsedationforercpaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT poonyathawonsahadol cocktailsedationcontainingpropofolversusconventionalsedationforercpaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT ponauthaiyuwadee cocktailsedationcontainingpropofolversusconventionalsedationforercpaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT sumdinsakolkan cocktailsedationcontainingpropofolversusconventionalsedationforercpaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kullavanijayapinit cocktailsedationcontainingpropofolversusconventionalsedationforercpaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy |