Cargando…

The Impact of Concomitant Medication Use on Patient Eligibility for Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials

Concomitant medication (CM) use may result in Phase I cancer clinical trial ineligibility due to concern for potential CM-investigational drug interactions or alteration of investigational drug absorption. Few studies have examined the impact of CM use on trial eligibility. Methods: We reviewed reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borad, Mitesh J., Curtis, Kelly K., Babiker, Hani M., Benjamin, Martin, Tibes, Raoul, Ramanathan, Ramesh K., Wright, Karen, Dueck, Amylou C., Jameson, Gayle, Von Hoff, Daniel D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3434362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22962561
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.4714
_version_ 1782242428120465408
author Borad, Mitesh J.
Curtis, Kelly K.
Babiker, Hani M.
Benjamin, Martin
Tibes, Raoul
Ramanathan, Ramesh K.
Wright, Karen
Dueck, Amylou C.
Jameson, Gayle
Von Hoff, Daniel D.
author_facet Borad, Mitesh J.
Curtis, Kelly K.
Babiker, Hani M.
Benjamin, Martin
Tibes, Raoul
Ramanathan, Ramesh K.
Wright, Karen
Dueck, Amylou C.
Jameson, Gayle
Von Hoff, Daniel D.
author_sort Borad, Mitesh J.
collection PubMed
description Concomitant medication (CM) use may result in Phase I cancer clinical trial ineligibility due to concern for potential CM-investigational drug interactions or alteration of investigational drug absorption. Few studies have examined the impact of CM use on trial eligibility. Methods: We reviewed records of 274 patients on Phase I trials at a single academic institution. Demographics, CM identities and classes, CM discontinuation, reasons, and incidence of CM substitution were recorded. CM-investigational drug cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme interactions were documented. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. Results: 273 of 274 patients (99.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 98.9-100%) took CM, with a median of 8 CM per patient (range 0 - 42). CM discontinuation occurred in 67 cases (25%, 95% CI 19-30%). The most common CM classes discontinued were herbal (17 cases, 25%, 95% CI 16-37%) and proton pump inhibitors (15 cases, 22%, 95% CI 12-32%). CM discontinuation reasons were: protocol prohibition (32 cases, 48%, 95% CI 36-60%); potential CM-investigational drug interaction (25 cases, 37%, 95% CI 26-49%); other (10 cases, 15%, 95% CI 6-23%). A potential CM-investigational drug CYP interaction was noted in 122 cases (45%, 95% CI 39-50%). CM potentially weakly decreased investigational drug metabolism in 52 cases (43%, 95% CI 34-51%), and potentially strongly decreased investigational drug metabolism in 17 cases (14%, 95% CI 8-20%). Investigational drug potentially weakly decreased CM metabolism in 39 cases (32%, 95% CI 24-40%), and potentially strongly decreased CM metabolism in 28 cases (23%, 95% CI 15-30%). CM substitution occurred in 36/67 cases (54%, 95% CI 41-66%) where CM were discontinued to allow for eventual participation in clinical trials. Overall in 2 cases (0.7%, 95% CI 0.1-2.6%), patients were protocol ineligible because CM could not be discontinued or substituted. Conclusions: This study highlights the high prevalence of concomitant medication use among cancer patients enrolled in phase I clinical trials. Most patients did meet trial eligibility criteria with careful substitution and discontinuation of CM. The most common reason for discontinuation of CM was protocol prohibition. The most common medications discontinued were herbal, proton pump inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor anti-depressants, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3434362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34343622012-09-07 The Impact of Concomitant Medication Use on Patient Eligibility for Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials Borad, Mitesh J. Curtis, Kelly K. Babiker, Hani M. Benjamin, Martin Tibes, Raoul Ramanathan, Ramesh K. Wright, Karen Dueck, Amylou C. Jameson, Gayle Von Hoff, Daniel D. J Cancer Research Paper Concomitant medication (CM) use may result in Phase I cancer clinical trial ineligibility due to concern for potential CM-investigational drug interactions or alteration of investigational drug absorption. Few studies have examined the impact of CM use on trial eligibility. Methods: We reviewed records of 274 patients on Phase I trials at a single academic institution. Demographics, CM identities and classes, CM discontinuation, reasons, and incidence of CM substitution were recorded. CM-investigational drug cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme interactions were documented. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. Results: 273 of 274 patients (99.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 98.9-100%) took CM, with a median of 8 CM per patient (range 0 - 42). CM discontinuation occurred in 67 cases (25%, 95% CI 19-30%). The most common CM classes discontinued were herbal (17 cases, 25%, 95% CI 16-37%) and proton pump inhibitors (15 cases, 22%, 95% CI 12-32%). CM discontinuation reasons were: protocol prohibition (32 cases, 48%, 95% CI 36-60%); potential CM-investigational drug interaction (25 cases, 37%, 95% CI 26-49%); other (10 cases, 15%, 95% CI 6-23%). A potential CM-investigational drug CYP interaction was noted in 122 cases (45%, 95% CI 39-50%). CM potentially weakly decreased investigational drug metabolism in 52 cases (43%, 95% CI 34-51%), and potentially strongly decreased investigational drug metabolism in 17 cases (14%, 95% CI 8-20%). Investigational drug potentially weakly decreased CM metabolism in 39 cases (32%, 95% CI 24-40%), and potentially strongly decreased CM metabolism in 28 cases (23%, 95% CI 15-30%). CM substitution occurred in 36/67 cases (54%, 95% CI 41-66%) where CM were discontinued to allow for eventual participation in clinical trials. Overall in 2 cases (0.7%, 95% CI 0.1-2.6%), patients were protocol ineligible because CM could not be discontinued or substituted. Conclusions: This study highlights the high prevalence of concomitant medication use among cancer patients enrolled in phase I clinical trials. Most patients did meet trial eligibility criteria with careful substitution and discontinuation of CM. The most common reason for discontinuation of CM was protocol prohibition. The most common medications discontinued were herbal, proton pump inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor anti-depressants, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ivyspring International Publisher 2012-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3434362/ /pubmed/22962561 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.4714 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Borad, Mitesh J.
Curtis, Kelly K.
Babiker, Hani M.
Benjamin, Martin
Tibes, Raoul
Ramanathan, Ramesh K.
Wright, Karen
Dueck, Amylou C.
Jameson, Gayle
Von Hoff, Daniel D.
The Impact of Concomitant Medication Use on Patient Eligibility for Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
title The Impact of Concomitant Medication Use on Patient Eligibility for Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
title_full The Impact of Concomitant Medication Use on Patient Eligibility for Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
title_fullStr The Impact of Concomitant Medication Use on Patient Eligibility for Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Concomitant Medication Use on Patient Eligibility for Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
title_short The Impact of Concomitant Medication Use on Patient Eligibility for Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
title_sort impact of concomitant medication use on patient eligibility for phase i cancer clinical trials
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3434362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22962561
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.4714
work_keys_str_mv AT boradmiteshj theimpactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT curtiskellyk theimpactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT babikerhanim theimpactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT benjaminmartin theimpactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT tibesraoul theimpactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT ramanathanrameshk theimpactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT wrightkaren theimpactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT dueckamylouc theimpactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT jamesongayle theimpactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT vonhoffdanield theimpactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT boradmiteshj impactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT curtiskellyk impactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT babikerhanim impactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT benjaminmartin impactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT tibesraoul impactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT ramanathanrameshk impactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT wrightkaren impactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT dueckamylouc impactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT jamesongayle impactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials
AT vonhoffdanield impactofconcomitantmedicationuseonpatienteligibilityforphaseicancerclinicaltrials