Cargando…

Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide (1.38 million cancer deaths, 18.2% of the total) and of cancer morbidity (1.61 million new cases, 12.7% of all new cancers). Currently only three second-line non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pharmacotherapies are licensed in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwander, Bjoern, Ravera, Simona, Giuliani, Giovanni, Nuijten, Mark, Walzer, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22969300
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S34371
_version_ 1782242483564969984
author Schwander, Bjoern
Ravera, Simona
Giuliani, Giovanni
Nuijten, Mark
Walzer, Stefan
author_facet Schwander, Bjoern
Ravera, Simona
Giuliani, Giovanni
Nuijten, Mark
Walzer, Stefan
author_sort Schwander, Bjoern
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide (1.38 million cancer deaths, 18.2% of the total) and of cancer morbidity (1.61 million new cases, 12.7% of all new cancers). Currently only three second-line non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pharmacotherapies are licensed in the European Union: the chemotherapies pemetrexed and docetaxel and the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib. These therapy alternatives have shown a comparable efficacy (survival benefit). In the past, cost comparisons showed that erlotinib was less costly compared to docetaxel, which in turn is cheaper than pemetrexed. Nowadays erlotinib (and docetaxel) are still less expensive than pemetrexed; but docetaxel lost patent protection (basic compound patent) at the end of 2010, so docetaxel drug costs have decreased rapidly and the question remains whether erlotinib is still the least costly therapy alternative in second-line NSCLC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Italy was selected for base case analysis to compare the total therapy costs, estimated by combining country-specific drug costs, administration costs, and adverse event costs of erlotinib and generic docetaxel in second-line NSCLC therapy. Sensitivity analyses on central input parameters have been performed. RESULTS: The total costs of treating one patient with erlotinib therapy of €5121 are lower than the docetaxel costs of €6699 for the Italian health care setting. Although the drug costs of erlotinib are higher than generic docetaxel (incremental €3770): the costs of intravenous chemotherapy administration (incremental −€4510), and the costs of adverse event therapy (incremental −€837) lead to higher total therapy costs for docetaxel compared to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy erlotinib. CONCLUSION: The cost comparison findings for Italy show that erlotinib is still the less costly therapy alternative in second-line NSCLC. These results were robust to changes of central input parameters and robust to further potential price decreases for docetaxel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3435091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34350912012-09-11 Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy Schwander, Bjoern Ravera, Simona Giuliani, Giovanni Nuijten, Mark Walzer, Stefan Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide (1.38 million cancer deaths, 18.2% of the total) and of cancer morbidity (1.61 million new cases, 12.7% of all new cancers). Currently only three second-line non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pharmacotherapies are licensed in the European Union: the chemotherapies pemetrexed and docetaxel and the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib. These therapy alternatives have shown a comparable efficacy (survival benefit). In the past, cost comparisons showed that erlotinib was less costly compared to docetaxel, which in turn is cheaper than pemetrexed. Nowadays erlotinib (and docetaxel) are still less expensive than pemetrexed; but docetaxel lost patent protection (basic compound patent) at the end of 2010, so docetaxel drug costs have decreased rapidly and the question remains whether erlotinib is still the least costly therapy alternative in second-line NSCLC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Italy was selected for base case analysis to compare the total therapy costs, estimated by combining country-specific drug costs, administration costs, and adverse event costs of erlotinib and generic docetaxel in second-line NSCLC therapy. Sensitivity analyses on central input parameters have been performed. RESULTS: The total costs of treating one patient with erlotinib therapy of €5121 are lower than the docetaxel costs of €6699 for the Italian health care setting. Although the drug costs of erlotinib are higher than generic docetaxel (incremental €3770): the costs of intravenous chemotherapy administration (incremental −€4510), and the costs of adverse event therapy (incremental −€837) lead to higher total therapy costs for docetaxel compared to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy erlotinib. CONCLUSION: The cost comparison findings for Italy show that erlotinib is still the less costly therapy alternative in second-line NSCLC. These results were robust to changes of central input parameters and robust to further potential price decreases for docetaxel. Dove Medical Press 2012-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3435091/ /pubmed/22969300 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S34371 Text en © 2012 Schwander et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Schwander, Bjoern
Ravera, Simona
Giuliani, Giovanni
Nuijten, Mark
Walzer, Stefan
Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy
title Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy
title_full Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy
title_fullStr Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy
title_full_unstemmed Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy
title_short Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy
title_sort cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for italy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22969300
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S34371
work_keys_str_mv AT schwanderbjoern costcomparisonofsecondlinetreatmentoptionsforlatestagenonsmallcelllungcancercostanalysisforitaly
AT raverasimona costcomparisonofsecondlinetreatmentoptionsforlatestagenonsmallcelllungcancercostanalysisforitaly
AT giulianigiovanni costcomparisonofsecondlinetreatmentoptionsforlatestagenonsmallcelllungcancercostanalysisforitaly
AT nuijtenmark costcomparisonofsecondlinetreatmentoptionsforlatestagenonsmallcelllungcancercostanalysisforitaly
AT walzerstefan costcomparisonofsecondlinetreatmentoptionsforlatestagenonsmallcelllungcancercostanalysisforitaly