Cargando…

Assessing Bacterial Populations in the Lung by Replicate Analysis of Samples from the Upper and Lower Respiratory Tracts

Microbes of the human respiratory tract are important in health and disease, but accurate sampling of the lung presents challenges. Lung microbes are commonly sampled by bronchoscopy, but to acquire samples the bronchoscope must pass through the upper respiratory tract, which is rich in microbes. He...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charlson, Emily S., Bittinger, Kyle, Chen, Jun, Diamond, Joshua M., Li, Hongzhe, Collman, Ronald G., Bushman, Frederic D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22970118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042786
_version_ 1782242519608721408
author Charlson, Emily S.
Bittinger, Kyle
Chen, Jun
Diamond, Joshua M.
Li, Hongzhe
Collman, Ronald G.
Bushman, Frederic D.
author_facet Charlson, Emily S.
Bittinger, Kyle
Chen, Jun
Diamond, Joshua M.
Li, Hongzhe
Collman, Ronald G.
Bushman, Frederic D.
author_sort Charlson, Emily S.
collection PubMed
description Microbes of the human respiratory tract are important in health and disease, but accurate sampling of the lung presents challenges. Lung microbes are commonly sampled by bronchoscopy, but to acquire samples the bronchoscope must pass through the upper respiratory tract, which is rich in microbes. Here we present methods to identify authentic lung microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid that contains substantial oropharyngeal admixture. We studied clinical BAL samples from six selected subjects with potential heavy lung colonization. A single sample of BAL fluid was obtained from each subject along with contemporaneous oral wash (OW) to sample the oropharynx, and then DNA was extracted from three separate aliquots of each. Bacterial 16S rDNA sequences were amplified and products analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing. By comparing replicates, we were able to specify the depth of sequencing needed to reach a 95% chance of identifying a bacterial lineage of a given proportion—for example, at a depth of 5,000 tags, OTUs of proportion 0.3% or greater would be called with 95% confidence. We next constructed a single-sided outlier test that allowed lung-enriched organisms to be quantified against a background of oropharyngeal admixture, and assessed improvements available with replicate sequence analysis. This allowed identification of lineages enriched in lung in some BAL specimens. Finally, using samples from healthy volunteers collected at multiple sites in the upper respiratory tract, we show that OW provides a reasonable but not perfect surrogate for bacteria carried into to the lung by a bronchoscope. These methods allow identification of microbes that can replicate in the lung despite the background due to oropharyngeal microbes derived from aspiration and bronchoscopic carry-over.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3435383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34353832012-09-11 Assessing Bacterial Populations in the Lung by Replicate Analysis of Samples from the Upper and Lower Respiratory Tracts Charlson, Emily S. Bittinger, Kyle Chen, Jun Diamond, Joshua M. Li, Hongzhe Collman, Ronald G. Bushman, Frederic D. PLoS One Research Article Microbes of the human respiratory tract are important in health and disease, but accurate sampling of the lung presents challenges. Lung microbes are commonly sampled by bronchoscopy, but to acquire samples the bronchoscope must pass through the upper respiratory tract, which is rich in microbes. Here we present methods to identify authentic lung microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid that contains substantial oropharyngeal admixture. We studied clinical BAL samples from six selected subjects with potential heavy lung colonization. A single sample of BAL fluid was obtained from each subject along with contemporaneous oral wash (OW) to sample the oropharynx, and then DNA was extracted from three separate aliquots of each. Bacterial 16S rDNA sequences were amplified and products analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing. By comparing replicates, we were able to specify the depth of sequencing needed to reach a 95% chance of identifying a bacterial lineage of a given proportion—for example, at a depth of 5,000 tags, OTUs of proportion 0.3% or greater would be called with 95% confidence. We next constructed a single-sided outlier test that allowed lung-enriched organisms to be quantified against a background of oropharyngeal admixture, and assessed improvements available with replicate sequence analysis. This allowed identification of lineages enriched in lung in some BAL specimens. Finally, using samples from healthy volunteers collected at multiple sites in the upper respiratory tract, we show that OW provides a reasonable but not perfect surrogate for bacteria carried into to the lung by a bronchoscope. These methods allow identification of microbes that can replicate in the lung despite the background due to oropharyngeal microbes derived from aspiration and bronchoscopic carry-over. Public Library of Science 2012-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3435383/ /pubmed/22970118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042786 Text en © 2012 Charlson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Charlson, Emily S.
Bittinger, Kyle
Chen, Jun
Diamond, Joshua M.
Li, Hongzhe
Collman, Ronald G.
Bushman, Frederic D.
Assessing Bacterial Populations in the Lung by Replicate Analysis of Samples from the Upper and Lower Respiratory Tracts
title Assessing Bacterial Populations in the Lung by Replicate Analysis of Samples from the Upper and Lower Respiratory Tracts
title_full Assessing Bacterial Populations in the Lung by Replicate Analysis of Samples from the Upper and Lower Respiratory Tracts
title_fullStr Assessing Bacterial Populations in the Lung by Replicate Analysis of Samples from the Upper and Lower Respiratory Tracts
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Bacterial Populations in the Lung by Replicate Analysis of Samples from the Upper and Lower Respiratory Tracts
title_short Assessing Bacterial Populations in the Lung by Replicate Analysis of Samples from the Upper and Lower Respiratory Tracts
title_sort assessing bacterial populations in the lung by replicate analysis of samples from the upper and lower respiratory tracts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22970118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042786
work_keys_str_mv AT charlsonemilys assessingbacterialpopulationsinthelungbyreplicateanalysisofsamplesfromtheupperandlowerrespiratorytracts
AT bittingerkyle assessingbacterialpopulationsinthelungbyreplicateanalysisofsamplesfromtheupperandlowerrespiratorytracts
AT chenjun assessingbacterialpopulationsinthelungbyreplicateanalysisofsamplesfromtheupperandlowerrespiratorytracts
AT diamondjoshuam assessingbacterialpopulationsinthelungbyreplicateanalysisofsamplesfromtheupperandlowerrespiratorytracts
AT lihongzhe assessingbacterialpopulationsinthelungbyreplicateanalysisofsamplesfromtheupperandlowerrespiratorytracts
AT collmanronaldg assessingbacterialpopulationsinthelungbyreplicateanalysisofsamplesfromtheupperandlowerrespiratorytracts
AT bushmanfredericd assessingbacterialpopulationsinthelungbyreplicateanalysisofsamplesfromtheupperandlowerrespiratorytracts