Cargando…

Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index

Estimating crop yield using remote sensing techniques has proven to be successful. However, sugarcane possesses unique characteristics; such as, a multi-year cropping cycle and plant height-limiting for midseason fertilizer application timing. Our study objective was to determine if sugarcane yield...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lofton, Josh, Tubana, Brenda S., Kanke, Yumiko, Teboh, Jasper, Viator, Howard, Dalen, Marilyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22969359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120607529
_version_ 1782242630436913152
author Lofton, Josh
Tubana, Brenda S.
Kanke, Yumiko
Teboh, Jasper
Viator, Howard
Dalen, Marilyn
author_facet Lofton, Josh
Tubana, Brenda S.
Kanke, Yumiko
Teboh, Jasper
Viator, Howard
Dalen, Marilyn
author_sort Lofton, Josh
collection PubMed
description Estimating crop yield using remote sensing techniques has proven to be successful. However, sugarcane possesses unique characteristics; such as, a multi-year cropping cycle and plant height-limiting for midseason fertilizer application timing. Our study objective was to determine if sugarcane yield potential could be estimated using an in-season estimation of normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI). Sensor readings were taken using the GreenSeeker® handheld sensor from 2008 to 2011 in St. Gabriel and Jeanerette, LA, USA. In-season estimates of yield (INSEY) values were calculated by dividing NDVI by thermal variables. Optimum timing for estimating sugarcane yield was between 601–750 GDD. In-season estimated yield values improved the yield potential (YP) model compared to using NDVI. Generally, INSEY value showed a positive exponential relationship with yield (r(2) values 0.48 and 0.42 for cane tonnage and sugar yield, respectively). When models were separated based on canopy structure there was an increase the strength of the relationship for the erectophile varieties (r(2) 0.53 and 0.47 for cane tonnage and sugar yield, respectively); however, the model for planophile varieties weakened slightly. Results of this study indicate using an INSEY value for predicting sugarcane yield shows potential of being a valuable management tool for sugarcane producers in Louisiana.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3435988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34359882012-09-11 Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index Lofton, Josh Tubana, Brenda S. Kanke, Yumiko Teboh, Jasper Viator, Howard Dalen, Marilyn Sensors (Basel) Article Estimating crop yield using remote sensing techniques has proven to be successful. However, sugarcane possesses unique characteristics; such as, a multi-year cropping cycle and plant height-limiting for midseason fertilizer application timing. Our study objective was to determine if sugarcane yield potential could be estimated using an in-season estimation of normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI). Sensor readings were taken using the GreenSeeker® handheld sensor from 2008 to 2011 in St. Gabriel and Jeanerette, LA, USA. In-season estimates of yield (INSEY) values were calculated by dividing NDVI by thermal variables. Optimum timing for estimating sugarcane yield was between 601–750 GDD. In-season estimated yield values improved the yield potential (YP) model compared to using NDVI. Generally, INSEY value showed a positive exponential relationship with yield (r(2) values 0.48 and 0.42 for cane tonnage and sugar yield, respectively). When models were separated based on canopy structure there was an increase the strength of the relationship for the erectophile varieties (r(2) 0.53 and 0.47 for cane tonnage and sugar yield, respectively); however, the model for planophile varieties weakened slightly. Results of this study indicate using an INSEY value for predicting sugarcane yield shows potential of being a valuable management tool for sugarcane producers in Louisiana. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3435988/ /pubmed/22969359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120607529 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lofton, Josh
Tubana, Brenda S.
Kanke, Yumiko
Teboh, Jasper
Viator, Howard
Dalen, Marilyn
Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index
title Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index
title_full Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index
title_fullStr Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index
title_short Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index
title_sort estimating sugarcane yield potential using an in-season determination of normalized difference vegetative index
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22969359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120607529
work_keys_str_mv AT loftonjosh estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex
AT tubanabrendas estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex
AT kankeyumiko estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex
AT tebohjasper estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex
AT viatorhoward estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex
AT dalenmarilyn estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex