Cargando…
Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index
Estimating crop yield using remote sensing techniques has proven to be successful. However, sugarcane possesses unique characteristics; such as, a multi-year cropping cycle and plant height-limiting for midseason fertilizer application timing. Our study objective was to determine if sugarcane yield...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22969359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120607529 |
_version_ | 1782242630436913152 |
---|---|
author | Lofton, Josh Tubana, Brenda S. Kanke, Yumiko Teboh, Jasper Viator, Howard Dalen, Marilyn |
author_facet | Lofton, Josh Tubana, Brenda S. Kanke, Yumiko Teboh, Jasper Viator, Howard Dalen, Marilyn |
author_sort | Lofton, Josh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Estimating crop yield using remote sensing techniques has proven to be successful. However, sugarcane possesses unique characteristics; such as, a multi-year cropping cycle and plant height-limiting for midseason fertilizer application timing. Our study objective was to determine if sugarcane yield potential could be estimated using an in-season estimation of normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI). Sensor readings were taken using the GreenSeeker® handheld sensor from 2008 to 2011 in St. Gabriel and Jeanerette, LA, USA. In-season estimates of yield (INSEY) values were calculated by dividing NDVI by thermal variables. Optimum timing for estimating sugarcane yield was between 601–750 GDD. In-season estimated yield values improved the yield potential (YP) model compared to using NDVI. Generally, INSEY value showed a positive exponential relationship with yield (r(2) values 0.48 and 0.42 for cane tonnage and sugar yield, respectively). When models were separated based on canopy structure there was an increase the strength of the relationship for the erectophile varieties (r(2) 0.53 and 0.47 for cane tonnage and sugar yield, respectively); however, the model for planophile varieties weakened slightly. Results of this study indicate using an INSEY value for predicting sugarcane yield shows potential of being a valuable management tool for sugarcane producers in Louisiana. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3435988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34359882012-09-11 Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index Lofton, Josh Tubana, Brenda S. Kanke, Yumiko Teboh, Jasper Viator, Howard Dalen, Marilyn Sensors (Basel) Article Estimating crop yield using remote sensing techniques has proven to be successful. However, sugarcane possesses unique characteristics; such as, a multi-year cropping cycle and plant height-limiting for midseason fertilizer application timing. Our study objective was to determine if sugarcane yield potential could be estimated using an in-season estimation of normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI). Sensor readings were taken using the GreenSeeker® handheld sensor from 2008 to 2011 in St. Gabriel and Jeanerette, LA, USA. In-season estimates of yield (INSEY) values were calculated by dividing NDVI by thermal variables. Optimum timing for estimating sugarcane yield was between 601–750 GDD. In-season estimated yield values improved the yield potential (YP) model compared to using NDVI. Generally, INSEY value showed a positive exponential relationship with yield (r(2) values 0.48 and 0.42 for cane tonnage and sugar yield, respectively). When models were separated based on canopy structure there was an increase the strength of the relationship for the erectophile varieties (r(2) 0.53 and 0.47 for cane tonnage and sugar yield, respectively); however, the model for planophile varieties weakened slightly. Results of this study indicate using an INSEY value for predicting sugarcane yield shows potential of being a valuable management tool for sugarcane producers in Louisiana. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3435988/ /pubmed/22969359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120607529 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lofton, Josh Tubana, Brenda S. Kanke, Yumiko Teboh, Jasper Viator, Howard Dalen, Marilyn Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index |
title | Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index |
title_full | Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index |
title_fullStr | Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index |
title_short | Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index |
title_sort | estimating sugarcane yield potential using an in-season determination of normalized difference vegetative index |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22969359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120607529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loftonjosh estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex AT tubanabrendas estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex AT kankeyumiko estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex AT tebohjasper estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex AT viatorhoward estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex AT dalenmarilyn estimatingsugarcaneyieldpotentialusinganinseasondeterminationofnormalizeddifferencevegetativeindex |