Cargando…

‘Tempos’ management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety

BACKGROUND: The role of time management in safe and efficient medicine is important but poorly incorporated into the taxonomies of error in primary care. This paper addresses the lack of time management, presenting a framework integrating five time scales termed ‘Tempos’ requiring parallel processin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amalberti, R, Brami, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3436095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22927486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-048710
_version_ 1782242646424551424
author Amalberti, R
Brami, J
author_facet Amalberti, R
Brami, J
author_sort Amalberti, R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of time management in safe and efficient medicine is important but poorly incorporated into the taxonomies of error in primary care. This paper addresses the lack of time management, presenting a framework integrating five time scales termed ‘Tempos’ requiring parallel processing by GPs: the disease's tempo (unexpected rapid evolutions, slow reaction to treatment); the office's tempo (day-to-day agenda and interruptions); the patient's tempo (time to express symptoms, compliance, emotion); the system's tempo (time for appointments, exams, and feedback); and the time to access to knowledge. The art of medicine is to control all of these tempos in parallel and simultaneously. METHOD: Two qualified physicians reviewed a sample of 1046 malpractice claims from one liability insurer to determine whether a medical injury had occurred and, if so, whether it was due to one or more tempo-related problems. 623 of these reports were analysed in greater detail to identify the prevalence and characteristics of claims and related time management errors. RESULTS: The percentages of contributing factors were as follows: disease tempo, 37.9%; office tempo, 13.2%; patient tempo, 13.8%; out-of-office coordination tempo, 22.6%; and GP's access to knowledge tempo, 33.2%. CONCLUSION: Although not conceptualised in most error taxonomies, the disease and patient tempos are cornerstones in risk management in primary care. Traditional taxonomies describe events from an analytical perspective of care at the system level and offer opportunities to improve organisation, process, and evidence-based medicine. The suggested classification describes events in terms of (unsafe) dynamic control of parallel constraints from the carer's perspective, namely the GP, and offers improvement on how to self manage and coordinate different contradictory tempos and day-to-day activities. Further work is needed to test the validity and usefulness of this approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3436095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34360952012-09-10 ‘Tempos’ management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety Amalberti, R Brami, J BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: The role of time management in safe and efficient medicine is important but poorly incorporated into the taxonomies of error in primary care. This paper addresses the lack of time management, presenting a framework integrating five time scales termed ‘Tempos’ requiring parallel processing by GPs: the disease's tempo (unexpected rapid evolutions, slow reaction to treatment); the office's tempo (day-to-day agenda and interruptions); the patient's tempo (time to express symptoms, compliance, emotion); the system's tempo (time for appointments, exams, and feedback); and the time to access to knowledge. The art of medicine is to control all of these tempos in parallel and simultaneously. METHOD: Two qualified physicians reviewed a sample of 1046 malpractice claims from one liability insurer to determine whether a medical injury had occurred and, if so, whether it was due to one or more tempo-related problems. 623 of these reports were analysed in greater detail to identify the prevalence and characteristics of claims and related time management errors. RESULTS: The percentages of contributing factors were as follows: disease tempo, 37.9%; office tempo, 13.2%; patient tempo, 13.8%; out-of-office coordination tempo, 22.6%; and GP's access to knowledge tempo, 33.2%. CONCLUSION: Although not conceptualised in most error taxonomies, the disease and patient tempos are cornerstones in risk management in primary care. Traditional taxonomies describe events from an analytical perspective of care at the system level and offer opportunities to improve organisation, process, and evidence-based medicine. The suggested classification describes events in terms of (unsafe) dynamic control of parallel constraints from the carer's perspective, namely the GP, and offers improvement on how to self manage and coordinate different contradictory tempos and day-to-day activities. Further work is needed to test the validity and usefulness of this approach. BMJ Group 2012-09 2012-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3436095/ /pubmed/22927486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-048710 Text en © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Original Research
Amalberti, R
Brami, J
‘Tempos’ management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety
title ‘Tempos’ management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety
title_full ‘Tempos’ management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety
title_fullStr ‘Tempos’ management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety
title_full_unstemmed ‘Tempos’ management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety
title_short ‘Tempos’ management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety
title_sort ‘tempos’ management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3436095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22927486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-048710
work_keys_str_mv AT amalbertir temposmanagementinprimarycareakeyfactorforclassifyingadverseeventsandimprovingqualityandsafety
AT bramij temposmanagementinprimarycareakeyfactorforclassifyingadverseeventsandimprovingqualityandsafety