Cargando…

Antimicrobial resistance programs in Canada 1995-2010: a critical evaluation

BACKGROUND: In Canada, systematic efforts for controlling antibiotic resistance began in 1997 following a national Consensus Conference. The Canadian strategy produced 27 recommendations, one of which was the formation of the Canadian Committee on Antibiotic Resistance (CCAR). In addition several ot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Conly, John M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3436608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22958783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-1-10
_version_ 1782242651629682688
author Conly, John M
author_facet Conly, John M
author_sort Conly, John M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Canada, systematic efforts for controlling antibiotic resistance began in 1997 following a national Consensus Conference. The Canadian strategy produced 27 recommendations, one of which was the formation of the Canadian Committee on Antibiotic Resistance (CCAR). In addition several other organizations began working on a national or provincial basis over the ensuing years on one or more of the 3 identified core areas of the strategy. Critical evaluation of the major programs within Canada which focused on antimicrobial resistance and the identified core components has not been previously conducted. FINDINGS: Data was collected from multiple sources to determine the components of four major AMR programs that were considered national based on their scope or in the delivery of their mandates. Assessment of program components was adapted from the report from the International Forum on Antibiotic Resistance colloquium. Most of the programs used similar tools but only the Do Bugs Need Drugs Program (DBND) had components directed towards day cares and schools. Surveillance programs for antimicrobial resistant pathogens have limitations and/or significant sources of bias. Overall, there has been a 25.3% decrease in oral antimicrobial prescriptions in Canada since 1995, mainly due to decreases in β lactams, sulphonamides and tetracyclines in temporal association with multiple programs with the most comprehensive and sustained national programs being CCAR and DBND. CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been a substantial decrease in oral antimicrobial prescriptions in Canada since 1995, there remains a lack of leadership and co-ordination of antimicrobial resistance activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3436608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34366082012-09-08 Antimicrobial resistance programs in Canada 1995-2010: a critical evaluation Conly, John M Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: In Canada, systematic efforts for controlling antibiotic resistance began in 1997 following a national Consensus Conference. The Canadian strategy produced 27 recommendations, one of which was the formation of the Canadian Committee on Antibiotic Resistance (CCAR). In addition several other organizations began working on a national or provincial basis over the ensuing years on one or more of the 3 identified core areas of the strategy. Critical evaluation of the major programs within Canada which focused on antimicrobial resistance and the identified core components has not been previously conducted. FINDINGS: Data was collected from multiple sources to determine the components of four major AMR programs that were considered national based on their scope or in the delivery of their mandates. Assessment of program components was adapted from the report from the International Forum on Antibiotic Resistance colloquium. Most of the programs used similar tools but only the Do Bugs Need Drugs Program (DBND) had components directed towards day cares and schools. Surveillance programs for antimicrobial resistant pathogens have limitations and/or significant sources of bias. Overall, there has been a 25.3% decrease in oral antimicrobial prescriptions in Canada since 1995, mainly due to decreases in β lactams, sulphonamides and tetracyclines in temporal association with multiple programs with the most comprehensive and sustained national programs being CCAR and DBND. CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been a substantial decrease in oral antimicrobial prescriptions in Canada since 1995, there remains a lack of leadership and co-ordination of antimicrobial resistance activities. BioMed Central 2012-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3436608/ /pubmed/22958783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-1-10 Text en Copyright ©2012 Conly; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Conly, John M
Antimicrobial resistance programs in Canada 1995-2010: a critical evaluation
title Antimicrobial resistance programs in Canada 1995-2010: a critical evaluation
title_full Antimicrobial resistance programs in Canada 1995-2010: a critical evaluation
title_fullStr Antimicrobial resistance programs in Canada 1995-2010: a critical evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial resistance programs in Canada 1995-2010: a critical evaluation
title_short Antimicrobial resistance programs in Canada 1995-2010: a critical evaluation
title_sort antimicrobial resistance programs in canada 1995-2010: a critical evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3436608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22958783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-1-10
work_keys_str_mv AT conlyjohnm antimicrobialresistanceprogramsincanada19952010acriticalevaluation