Cargando…

A comparison of individual versus community influences on youth smoking behaviours: a cross-sectional observational study

OBJECTIVES: To compare individual with community risk factors for adolescent smoking. DESIGN: A cross-sectional observational study with multivariate analysis. SETTING: National telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS: 3646 US adolescents aged 13–18 years in 2007 recruited through a random digit-dial survey....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adachi-Mejia, Anna M, Carlos, Heather A, Berke, Ethan M, Tanski, Susanne E, Sargent, James D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3437428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22942229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000767
_version_ 1782242783712509952
author Adachi-Mejia, Anna M
Carlos, Heather A
Berke, Ethan M
Tanski, Susanne E
Sargent, James D
author_facet Adachi-Mejia, Anna M
Carlos, Heather A
Berke, Ethan M
Tanski, Susanne E
Sargent, James D
author_sort Adachi-Mejia, Anna M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare individual with community risk factors for adolescent smoking. DESIGN: A cross-sectional observational study with multivariate analysis. SETTING: National telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS: 3646 US adolescents aged 13–18 years in 2007 recruited through a random digit-dial survey. OUTCOME MEASURES: Ever tried smoking and, among experimental smokers, smoking intensity (based on smoking in past 30 days). RESULTS: One-third of participants (35.6%, N=1297) had tried smoking. After controlling for individual risk factors, neither tobacco outlet density nor proximity were associated with tried smoking or smoking intensity. Associations with trying smoking included age (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.23, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.31), lower socioeconomic status (AOR=0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91), sibling smoking (AOR=2.13, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.59), friend smoking (AOR=2.60, 95% CI 2.19 to 3.10 for some and AOR=7.01, 95% CI 5.05 to 9.74 for most), movie smoking exposure (AOR=2.66, 95% CI 1.95 to 3.63), team sports participation (AOR=0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.89) and sensation seeking (AOR=7.72, 95% CI 5.26 to 11.34). Among experimental smokers, age (AOR=1.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.44), minority status (AOR=0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79 for Black; AOR=0.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.69 for Hispanic; AOR=0.53, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.85 for mixed race/other), friend smoking (AOR=3.37, 95% CI 2.37 to 4.81 for some; AOR=20.27, 95% CI 13.22 to 31.08 for most), team sports participation (AOR=0.38, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.55) and sensation seeking (AOR=6.57, 95% CI 3.71 to 11.64) were associated with smoking intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that interventions and policies to prevent and reduce youth smoking should focus on individual risk factors for smoking, including supporting participation in team sports, minimising exposure to movie smoking, addressing the social influence of friend smoking and addressing experience seeking among high sensation-seekers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3437428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34374282012-09-12 A comparison of individual versus community influences on youth smoking behaviours: a cross-sectional observational study Adachi-Mejia, Anna M Carlos, Heather A Berke, Ethan M Tanski, Susanne E Sargent, James D BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To compare individual with community risk factors for adolescent smoking. DESIGN: A cross-sectional observational study with multivariate analysis. SETTING: National telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS: 3646 US adolescents aged 13–18 years in 2007 recruited through a random digit-dial survey. OUTCOME MEASURES: Ever tried smoking and, among experimental smokers, smoking intensity (based on smoking in past 30 days). RESULTS: One-third of participants (35.6%, N=1297) had tried smoking. After controlling for individual risk factors, neither tobacco outlet density nor proximity were associated with tried smoking or smoking intensity. Associations with trying smoking included age (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.23, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.31), lower socioeconomic status (AOR=0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91), sibling smoking (AOR=2.13, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.59), friend smoking (AOR=2.60, 95% CI 2.19 to 3.10 for some and AOR=7.01, 95% CI 5.05 to 9.74 for most), movie smoking exposure (AOR=2.66, 95% CI 1.95 to 3.63), team sports participation (AOR=0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.89) and sensation seeking (AOR=7.72, 95% CI 5.26 to 11.34). Among experimental smokers, age (AOR=1.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.44), minority status (AOR=0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79 for Black; AOR=0.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.69 for Hispanic; AOR=0.53, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.85 for mixed race/other), friend smoking (AOR=3.37, 95% CI 2.37 to 4.81 for some; AOR=20.27, 95% CI 13.22 to 31.08 for most), team sports participation (AOR=0.38, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.55) and sensation seeking (AOR=6.57, 95% CI 3.71 to 11.64) were associated with smoking intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that interventions and policies to prevent and reduce youth smoking should focus on individual risk factors for smoking, including supporting participation in team sports, minimising exposure to movie smoking, addressing the social influence of friend smoking and addressing experience seeking among high sensation-seekers. BMJ Group 2012 2012-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3437428/ /pubmed/22942229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000767 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Public Health
Adachi-Mejia, Anna M
Carlos, Heather A
Berke, Ethan M
Tanski, Susanne E
Sargent, James D
A comparison of individual versus community influences on youth smoking behaviours: a cross-sectional observational study
title A comparison of individual versus community influences on youth smoking behaviours: a cross-sectional observational study
title_full A comparison of individual versus community influences on youth smoking behaviours: a cross-sectional observational study
title_fullStr A comparison of individual versus community influences on youth smoking behaviours: a cross-sectional observational study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of individual versus community influences on youth smoking behaviours: a cross-sectional observational study
title_short A comparison of individual versus community influences on youth smoking behaviours: a cross-sectional observational study
title_sort comparison of individual versus community influences on youth smoking behaviours: a cross-sectional observational study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3437428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22942229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000767
work_keys_str_mv AT adachimejiaannam acomparisonofindividualversuscommunityinfluencesonyouthsmokingbehavioursacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT carlosheathera acomparisonofindividualversuscommunityinfluencesonyouthsmokingbehavioursacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT berkeethanm acomparisonofindividualversuscommunityinfluencesonyouthsmokingbehavioursacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT tanskisusannee acomparisonofindividualversuscommunityinfluencesonyouthsmokingbehavioursacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT sargentjamesd acomparisonofindividualversuscommunityinfluencesonyouthsmokingbehavioursacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT adachimejiaannam comparisonofindividualversuscommunityinfluencesonyouthsmokingbehavioursacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT carlosheathera comparisonofindividualversuscommunityinfluencesonyouthsmokingbehavioursacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT berkeethanm comparisonofindividualversuscommunityinfluencesonyouthsmokingbehavioursacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT tanskisusannee comparisonofindividualversuscommunityinfluencesonyouthsmokingbehavioursacrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT sargentjamesd comparisonofindividualversuscommunityinfluencesonyouthsmokingbehavioursacrosssectionalobservationalstudy