Cargando…
Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia
OBJECTIVES: Early child development may have important consequences for inequalities in health and well-being. This paper explores population level patterns of child development across Australian jurisdictions, considering socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. DESIGN: Census of child develo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3437432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22952161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001075 |
_version_ | 1782242784648888320 |
---|---|
author | Brinkman, Sally A Gialamas, Angela Rahman, Azizur Mittinty, Murthy N Gregory, Tess A Silburn, Sven Goldfeld, Sharon Zubrick, Stephen R Carr, Vaughan Janus, Magdalena Hertzman, Clyde Lynch, John W |
author_facet | Brinkman, Sally A Gialamas, Angela Rahman, Azizur Mittinty, Murthy N Gregory, Tess A Silburn, Sven Goldfeld, Sharon Zubrick, Stephen R Carr, Vaughan Janus, Magdalena Hertzman, Clyde Lynch, John W |
author_sort | Brinkman, Sally A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Early child development may have important consequences for inequalities in health and well-being. This paper explores population level patterns of child development across Australian jurisdictions, considering socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. DESIGN: Census of child development across Australia. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Teachers complete a developmental checklist, the Australian Early Development Index (AEDI), for all children in their first year of full-time schooling. Between May and July 2009, the AEDI was collected by 14 628 teachers in primary schools (government and non-government) across Australia, providing information on 261 147 children (approximately 97.5% of the estimated 5-year-old population). OUTCOME MEASURES: Level of developmental vulnerability in Australian children for five developmental domains: physical well-being, social competence, emotional maturity, language and cognitive skills and communication skills and general knowledge. RESULTS: The results show demographic and socioeconomic inequalities in child development as well as within and between jurisdiction inequalities. The magnitude of the overall level of inequality in child development and the impact of covariates varies considerably both between and within jurisdiction by sex. For example, the difference in overall developmental vulnerability between the best-performing and worst-performing jurisdiction is 12.5% for males and 7.1% for females. Levels of absolute social inequality within jurisdictions range from 8.2% for females to 12.7% for males. CONCLUSIONS: The different mix of universal and targeted services provided within jurisdictions from pregnancy to age 5 may contribute to inequality across the country. These results illustrate the potential utility of a developmental census to shed light on the impact of differences in universal and targeted services to support child development by school entry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3437432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34374322012-09-12 Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia Brinkman, Sally A Gialamas, Angela Rahman, Azizur Mittinty, Murthy N Gregory, Tess A Silburn, Sven Goldfeld, Sharon Zubrick, Stephen R Carr, Vaughan Janus, Magdalena Hertzman, Clyde Lynch, John W BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Early child development may have important consequences for inequalities in health and well-being. This paper explores population level patterns of child development across Australian jurisdictions, considering socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. DESIGN: Census of child development across Australia. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Teachers complete a developmental checklist, the Australian Early Development Index (AEDI), for all children in their first year of full-time schooling. Between May and July 2009, the AEDI was collected by 14 628 teachers in primary schools (government and non-government) across Australia, providing information on 261 147 children (approximately 97.5% of the estimated 5-year-old population). OUTCOME MEASURES: Level of developmental vulnerability in Australian children for five developmental domains: physical well-being, social competence, emotional maturity, language and cognitive skills and communication skills and general knowledge. RESULTS: The results show demographic and socioeconomic inequalities in child development as well as within and between jurisdiction inequalities. The magnitude of the overall level of inequality in child development and the impact of covariates varies considerably both between and within jurisdiction by sex. For example, the difference in overall developmental vulnerability between the best-performing and worst-performing jurisdiction is 12.5% for males and 7.1% for females. Levels of absolute social inequality within jurisdictions range from 8.2% for females to 12.7% for males. CONCLUSIONS: The different mix of universal and targeted services provided within jurisdictions from pregnancy to age 5 may contribute to inequality across the country. These results illustrate the potential utility of a developmental census to shed light on the impact of differences in universal and targeted services to support child development by school entry. BMJ Publishing Group 2012 2012-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3437432/ /pubmed/22952161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001075 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Brinkman, Sally A Gialamas, Angela Rahman, Azizur Mittinty, Murthy N Gregory, Tess A Silburn, Sven Goldfeld, Sharon Zubrick, Stephen R Carr, Vaughan Janus, Magdalena Hertzman, Clyde Lynch, John W Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia |
title | Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia |
title_full | Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia |
title_fullStr | Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia |
title_short | Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia |
title_sort | jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in australia |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3437432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22952161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brinkmansallya jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT gialamasangela jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT rahmanazizur jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT mittintymurthyn jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT gregorytessa jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT silburnsven jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT goldfeldsharon jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT zubrickstephenr jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT carrvaughan jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT janusmagdalena jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT hertzmanclyde jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia AT lynchjohnw jurisdictionalsocioeconomicandgenderinequalitiesinchildhealthanddevelopmentanalysisofanationalcensusof5yearoldsinaustralia |