Cargando…
Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of stamped reply envelope and the timing of newsletter distribution. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study with a 2×2 factorial design of two interventions. SETTING: The Japan Nurses’ Health Study (JNHS), a prospective cohort study for...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3437560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22952162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001181 |
_version_ | 1782242804431323136 |
---|---|
author | Wakabayashi, Chizuko Hayashi, Kunihiko Nagai, Kazue Sakamoto, Naoko Iwasaki, Yoko |
author_facet | Wakabayashi, Chizuko Hayashi, Kunihiko Nagai, Kazue Sakamoto, Naoko Iwasaki, Yoko |
author_sort | Wakabayashi, Chizuko |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of stamped reply envelope and the timing of newsletter distribution. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study with a 2×2 factorial design of two interventions. SETTING: The Japan Nurses’ Health Study (JNHS), a prospective cohort study for women's health. PARTICIPANTS: The present study included 6938 women who were part of the first-year entry cohort for the fifth wave of the biannual follow-up survey of the JNHS. INTERVENTION: The participants were randomly allocated into four groups; Group-1 (business-reply, newsletter with initial mailing), Group-2 (business-reply, newsletter with reminder), Group-3 (stamped envelopes, newsletter with initial mailing) and Group-4 (stamped envelopes, newsletter with reminder). The thank-you and reminder letters were mailed out at the end of the sixth week. This study was censored at the end of 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were cumulative response at the end of 6 and 12 weeks after mailing out the questionnaire. RESULTS: The cumulative response at 12 weeks were 58.3% for Group-1, 54.1% for Group-2, 60.5% for Group-3 and 56.7% for Group-4 (p=0.001). The odds of the response was higher for stamped envelopes than for business-reply envelopes (OR (95% CI)=1.10(1.00 to 1.21)). The odds was higher for newsletter delivery with initial mailing than for with reminder (1.18(1.07 to 1.29)). The response in first 6 weeks for stamped envelope was significantly higher than for business-reply envelope (p=0.047). Although the response in 6 weeks for women received the newsletter with initial mailing was lower than for women who did not, the proportions did not differ significantly (p=0.291). CONCLUSIONS: The style of return envelope affected response rates of mail survey. The results of this study suggest that practices of provision of the additional information, should be handled individually in advance, as a separate event from sending follow-up questionnaire or reminder letters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3437560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34375602012-09-12 Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study Wakabayashi, Chizuko Hayashi, Kunihiko Nagai, Kazue Sakamoto, Naoko Iwasaki, Yoko BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of stamped reply envelope and the timing of newsletter distribution. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study with a 2×2 factorial design of two interventions. SETTING: The Japan Nurses’ Health Study (JNHS), a prospective cohort study for women's health. PARTICIPANTS: The present study included 6938 women who were part of the first-year entry cohort for the fifth wave of the biannual follow-up survey of the JNHS. INTERVENTION: The participants were randomly allocated into four groups; Group-1 (business-reply, newsletter with initial mailing), Group-2 (business-reply, newsletter with reminder), Group-3 (stamped envelopes, newsletter with initial mailing) and Group-4 (stamped envelopes, newsletter with reminder). The thank-you and reminder letters were mailed out at the end of the sixth week. This study was censored at the end of 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were cumulative response at the end of 6 and 12 weeks after mailing out the questionnaire. RESULTS: The cumulative response at 12 weeks were 58.3% for Group-1, 54.1% for Group-2, 60.5% for Group-3 and 56.7% for Group-4 (p=0.001). The odds of the response was higher for stamped envelopes than for business-reply envelopes (OR (95% CI)=1.10(1.00 to 1.21)). The odds was higher for newsletter delivery with initial mailing than for with reminder (1.18(1.07 to 1.29)). The response in first 6 weeks for stamped envelope was significantly higher than for business-reply envelope (p=0.047). Although the response in 6 weeks for women received the newsletter with initial mailing was lower than for women who did not, the proportions did not differ significantly (p=0.291). CONCLUSIONS: The style of return envelope affected response rates of mail survey. The results of this study suggest that practices of provision of the additional information, should be handled individually in advance, as a separate event from sending follow-up questionnaire or reminder letters. BMJ Group 2012 2012-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3437560/ /pubmed/22952162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001181 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Wakabayashi, Chizuko Hayashi, Kunihiko Nagai, Kazue Sakamoto, Naoko Iwasaki, Yoko Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study |
title | Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3437560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22952162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wakabayashichizuko effectofstampedreplyenvelopesandtimingofnewsletterdeliveryonresponseratesofmailsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialinaprospectivecohortstudy AT hayashikunihiko effectofstampedreplyenvelopesandtimingofnewsletterdeliveryonresponseratesofmailsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialinaprospectivecohortstudy AT nagaikazue effectofstampedreplyenvelopesandtimingofnewsletterdeliveryonresponseratesofmailsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialinaprospectivecohortstudy AT sakamotonaoko effectofstampedreplyenvelopesandtimingofnewsletterdeliveryonresponseratesofmailsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialinaprospectivecohortstudy AT iwasakiyoko effectofstampedreplyenvelopesandtimingofnewsletterdeliveryonresponseratesofmailsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialinaprospectivecohortstudy |