Cargando…

Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of stamped reply envelope and the timing of newsletter distribution. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study with a 2×2 factorial design of two interventions. SETTING: The Japan Nurses’ Health Study (JNHS), a prospective cohort study for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wakabayashi, Chizuko, Hayashi, Kunihiko, Nagai, Kazue, Sakamoto, Naoko, Iwasaki, Yoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3437560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22952162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001181
_version_ 1782242804431323136
author Wakabayashi, Chizuko
Hayashi, Kunihiko
Nagai, Kazue
Sakamoto, Naoko
Iwasaki, Yoko
author_facet Wakabayashi, Chizuko
Hayashi, Kunihiko
Nagai, Kazue
Sakamoto, Naoko
Iwasaki, Yoko
author_sort Wakabayashi, Chizuko
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of stamped reply envelope and the timing of newsletter distribution. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study with a 2×2 factorial design of two interventions. SETTING: The Japan Nurses’ Health Study (JNHS), a prospective cohort study for women's health. PARTICIPANTS: The present study included 6938 women who were part of the first-year entry cohort for the fifth wave of the biannual follow-up survey of the JNHS. INTERVENTION: The participants were randomly allocated into four groups; Group-1 (business-reply, newsletter with initial mailing), Group-2 (business-reply, newsletter with reminder), Group-3 (stamped envelopes, newsletter with initial mailing) and Group-4 (stamped envelopes, newsletter with reminder). The thank-you and reminder letters were mailed out at the end of the sixth week. This study was censored at the end of 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were cumulative response at the end of 6 and 12 weeks after mailing out the questionnaire. RESULTS: The cumulative response at 12 weeks were 58.3% for Group-1, 54.1% for Group-2, 60.5% for Group-3 and 56.7% for Group-4 (p=0.001). The odds of the response was higher for stamped envelopes than for business-reply envelopes (OR (95% CI)=1.10(1.00 to 1.21)). The odds was higher for newsletter delivery with initial mailing than for with reminder (1.18(1.07 to 1.29)). The response in first 6 weeks for stamped envelope was significantly higher than for business-reply envelope (p=0.047). Although the response in 6 weeks for women received the newsletter with initial mailing was lower than for women who did not, the proportions did not differ significantly (p=0.291). CONCLUSIONS: The style of return envelope affected response rates of mail survey. The results of this study suggest that practices of provision of the additional information, should be handled individually in advance, as a separate event from sending follow-up questionnaire or reminder letters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3437560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34375602012-09-12 Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study Wakabayashi, Chizuko Hayashi, Kunihiko Nagai, Kazue Sakamoto, Naoko Iwasaki, Yoko BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of stamped reply envelope and the timing of newsletter distribution. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study with a 2×2 factorial design of two interventions. SETTING: The Japan Nurses’ Health Study (JNHS), a prospective cohort study for women's health. PARTICIPANTS: The present study included 6938 women who were part of the first-year entry cohort for the fifth wave of the biannual follow-up survey of the JNHS. INTERVENTION: The participants were randomly allocated into four groups; Group-1 (business-reply, newsletter with initial mailing), Group-2 (business-reply, newsletter with reminder), Group-3 (stamped envelopes, newsletter with initial mailing) and Group-4 (stamped envelopes, newsletter with reminder). The thank-you and reminder letters were mailed out at the end of the sixth week. This study was censored at the end of 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were cumulative response at the end of 6 and 12 weeks after mailing out the questionnaire. RESULTS: The cumulative response at 12 weeks were 58.3% for Group-1, 54.1% for Group-2, 60.5% for Group-3 and 56.7% for Group-4 (p=0.001). The odds of the response was higher for stamped envelopes than for business-reply envelopes (OR (95% CI)=1.10(1.00 to 1.21)). The odds was higher for newsletter delivery with initial mailing than for with reminder (1.18(1.07 to 1.29)). The response in first 6 weeks for stamped envelope was significantly higher than for business-reply envelope (p=0.047). Although the response in 6 weeks for women received the newsletter with initial mailing was lower than for women who did not, the proportions did not differ significantly (p=0.291). CONCLUSIONS: The style of return envelope affected response rates of mail survey. The results of this study suggest that practices of provision of the additional information, should be handled individually in advance, as a separate event from sending follow-up questionnaire or reminder letters. BMJ Group 2012 2012-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3437560/ /pubmed/22952162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001181 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Wakabayashi, Chizuko
Hayashi, Kunihiko
Nagai, Kazue
Sakamoto, Naoko
Iwasaki, Yoko
Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study
title Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study
title_full Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study
title_short Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study
title_sort effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3437560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22952162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001181
work_keys_str_mv AT wakabayashichizuko effectofstampedreplyenvelopesandtimingofnewsletterdeliveryonresponseratesofmailsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT hayashikunihiko effectofstampedreplyenvelopesandtimingofnewsletterdeliveryonresponseratesofmailsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT nagaikazue effectofstampedreplyenvelopesandtimingofnewsletterdeliveryonresponseratesofmailsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sakamotonaoko effectofstampedreplyenvelopesandtimingofnewsletterdeliveryonresponseratesofmailsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialinaprospectivecohortstudy
AT iwasakiyoko effectofstampedreplyenvelopesandtimingofnewsletterdeliveryonresponseratesofmailsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialinaprospectivecohortstudy