Cargando…

The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVE: To find out the predictive value of the ΣΔST/ΔHR index for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHOD: Subjects of this research were patients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program as six to eight weeks of a hospital-based program after receiving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Chul, Choi, Hee Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3438422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977781
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.544
_version_ 1782242910014537728
author Kim, Chul
Choi, Hee Eun
author_facet Kim, Chul
Choi, Hee Eun
author_sort Kim, Chul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To find out the predictive value of the ΣΔST/ΔHR index for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHOD: Subjects of this research were patients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program as six to eight weeks of a hospital-based program after receiving PCI to treat acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The patients received coronary angiography (CAG) at the onset of the ACS and nine months after that, and also received an exercise tolerance test (ETT) at the start of the CR program and several days before receiving a follow-up CAG. In ETT, we used the sum of the ST depression (ΣΔST index) of leads II, III, aVF, V(4-6) as well as the sum of the ΔST/ΔHR (heart rate) (ΣΔST/ΔHR index) in the same leads and the sum of the ΔST/ΔRPP (rate pressure product) (ΣΔST/ΔRPP index) in the same leads. We compared the predictive power of each index of ETT for restenosis after PCI. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ΣΔST index were 69%, 47%, 31%, and 82%. The ΣΔST/ΔHR index was 13.7±5.2 in the restenosis group and 9.3±5.6 in the patent group (p=0.017). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this index were 85%, 63%, 44%, and 92%. The ΣΔST/ΔRPP index were 0.10±0.08 in the restenosis group and 0.06±0.04 in the patent group (p=0.016). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this index were 54%, 76%, 44%, and 83%. CONCLUSION: The ΣΔST/ΔHR index showed a much higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for restenosis after PCI compared to the ΣΔST index.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3438422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34384222012-09-13 The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Kim, Chul Choi, Hee Eun Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To find out the predictive value of the ΣΔST/ΔHR index for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHOD: Subjects of this research were patients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program as six to eight weeks of a hospital-based program after receiving PCI to treat acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The patients received coronary angiography (CAG) at the onset of the ACS and nine months after that, and also received an exercise tolerance test (ETT) at the start of the CR program and several days before receiving a follow-up CAG. In ETT, we used the sum of the ST depression (ΣΔST index) of leads II, III, aVF, V(4-6) as well as the sum of the ΔST/ΔHR (heart rate) (ΣΔST/ΔHR index) in the same leads and the sum of the ΔST/ΔRPP (rate pressure product) (ΣΔST/ΔRPP index) in the same leads. We compared the predictive power of each index of ETT for restenosis after PCI. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ΣΔST index were 69%, 47%, 31%, and 82%. The ΣΔST/ΔHR index was 13.7±5.2 in the restenosis group and 9.3±5.6 in the patent group (p=0.017). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this index were 85%, 63%, 44%, and 92%. The ΣΔST/ΔRPP index were 0.10±0.08 in the restenosis group and 0.06±0.04 in the patent group (p=0.016). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this index were 54%, 76%, 44%, and 83%. CONCLUSION: The ΣΔST/ΔHR index showed a much higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for restenosis after PCI compared to the ΣΔST index. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2012-08 2012-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3438422/ /pubmed/22977781 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.544 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Chul
Choi, Hee Eun
The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort predictive value of σδst/δhr index for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3438422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977781
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.544
work_keys_str_mv AT kimchul thepredictivevalueofsdstdhrindexforrestenosisafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT choiheeeun thepredictivevalueofsdstdhrindexforrestenosisafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT kimchul predictivevalueofsdstdhrindexforrestenosisafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT choiheeeun predictivevalueofsdstdhrindexforrestenosisafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention