Cargando…
The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
OBJECTIVE: To find out the predictive value of the ΣΔST/ΔHR index for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHOD: Subjects of this research were patients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program as six to eight weeks of a hospital-based program after receiving...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3438422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977781 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.544 |
_version_ | 1782242910014537728 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Chul Choi, Hee Eun |
author_facet | Kim, Chul Choi, Hee Eun |
author_sort | Kim, Chul |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To find out the predictive value of the ΣΔST/ΔHR index for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHOD: Subjects of this research were patients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program as six to eight weeks of a hospital-based program after receiving PCI to treat acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The patients received coronary angiography (CAG) at the onset of the ACS and nine months after that, and also received an exercise tolerance test (ETT) at the start of the CR program and several days before receiving a follow-up CAG. In ETT, we used the sum of the ST depression (ΣΔST index) of leads II, III, aVF, V(4-6) as well as the sum of the ΔST/ΔHR (heart rate) (ΣΔST/ΔHR index) in the same leads and the sum of the ΔST/ΔRPP (rate pressure product) (ΣΔST/ΔRPP index) in the same leads. We compared the predictive power of each index of ETT for restenosis after PCI. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ΣΔST index were 69%, 47%, 31%, and 82%. The ΣΔST/ΔHR index was 13.7±5.2 in the restenosis group and 9.3±5.6 in the patent group (p=0.017). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this index were 85%, 63%, 44%, and 92%. The ΣΔST/ΔRPP index were 0.10±0.08 in the restenosis group and 0.06±0.04 in the patent group (p=0.016). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this index were 54%, 76%, 44%, and 83%. CONCLUSION: The ΣΔST/ΔHR index showed a much higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for restenosis after PCI compared to the ΣΔST index. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3438422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34384222012-09-13 The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Kim, Chul Choi, Hee Eun Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To find out the predictive value of the ΣΔST/ΔHR index for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHOD: Subjects of this research were patients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program as six to eight weeks of a hospital-based program after receiving PCI to treat acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The patients received coronary angiography (CAG) at the onset of the ACS and nine months after that, and also received an exercise tolerance test (ETT) at the start of the CR program and several days before receiving a follow-up CAG. In ETT, we used the sum of the ST depression (ΣΔST index) of leads II, III, aVF, V(4-6) as well as the sum of the ΔST/ΔHR (heart rate) (ΣΔST/ΔHR index) in the same leads and the sum of the ΔST/ΔRPP (rate pressure product) (ΣΔST/ΔRPP index) in the same leads. We compared the predictive power of each index of ETT for restenosis after PCI. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ΣΔST index were 69%, 47%, 31%, and 82%. The ΣΔST/ΔHR index was 13.7±5.2 in the restenosis group and 9.3±5.6 in the patent group (p=0.017). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this index were 85%, 63%, 44%, and 92%. The ΣΔST/ΔRPP index were 0.10±0.08 in the restenosis group and 0.06±0.04 in the patent group (p=0.016). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this index were 54%, 76%, 44%, and 83%. CONCLUSION: The ΣΔST/ΔHR index showed a much higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for restenosis after PCI compared to the ΣΔST index. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2012-08 2012-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3438422/ /pubmed/22977781 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.544 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Chul Choi, Hee Eun The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title | The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_full | The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_fullStr | The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_short | The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_sort | predictive value of σδst/δhr index for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3438422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977781 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimchul thepredictivevalueofsdstdhrindexforrestenosisafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT choiheeeun thepredictivevalueofsdstdhrindexforrestenosisafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT kimchul predictivevalueofsdstdhrindexforrestenosisafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT choiheeeun predictivevalueofsdstdhrindexforrestenosisafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention |